Even if he were
the most dishonest person on the planet, if what he has to say is in any sense scientifically valid, then his claims should be taken seriously, scrutinised, and judged on their own merits.
Not exact matches
So funny to watch Fake News Networks, among the
most dishonest groups of
people I have ever dealt with, criticize Sinclair Broadcasting for being biased.
President Trump showed his support for Sinclair in a Tweet on Monday, saying «So funny to watch Fake News Networks, among the
most dishonest groups of
people I have ever dealt with, criticize Sinclair Broadcasting for being biased.»
Chad, I can now only as.sume that if you can't look at the arguements you're making against me and apply them to yourself then you're either a much bigger idiot than I could have ever thought, the
most intellectually
dishonest person on the planet or you're a troll.
When you run across someone who lies about his faith this is the
most dishonest thing a
person can do.
I'm glad I know christians in real life, because if I had to judge them by their online presence, I'd say that christians are some of the
most dishonest, hateful
people I've ever had the displeasure of encountering.
He also called journalists «among the
most dishonest human beings on earth,» and he said that up to 1.5 million
people had attended his inauguration — a claim photographs disproved.
But the number one problem
people seem to run into on mobile and online dating sites is feeling like they've been deceived by
dishonest photos / profiles, so the
most important thing you can do to increase your chances of success is to be honest, and be yourself.
There's reason to be suspect:
Most people are
dishonest on dating sites.
Instances involving fake members and
dishonest profiles can make even the
most open - minded
person skeptical.
The operating assumption of many (I would say
most) debt collectors is that
people who are overdue on debts are
dishonest deadbeats who can but won't pay up.
It is not surprising that scientists, who are not known to suffer fools gladly, to say the same thing in a different way, like
most intelligent
people are impatient with nonsense, are more than tired of posturing, whether naive or
dishonest.
I'm coming to the opinion that
most people who throw insults at global warming activists aren't being
dishonest, they're ill - informed, or they've been swayed by a clever (but false) argument.
Most people who throw insults at disbelievers aren't being
dishonest either, there really is a campaign of disinformation funded by the fossil fuel industry.
It is intellectually
dishonest to devote several pages to cherry - picking studies that disagree with the IPCC consensus on net health effects because you don't like its scientific conclusion, while then devoting several pages to hiding behind [a misstatement of] the U.N. consensus on sea level rise because you know a lot reasonable
people think the U.N. wildly underestimated the upper end of the range and you want to attack Al Gore for worrying about 20 - foot sea level rise.On this blog, I have tried to be clear what I believe with my earlier three - part series: Since sea level, arctic ice, and
most other climate change indicators have been changing faster than
most IPCC models projected and since the IPCC neglects key amplifying carbon cycle feedbacks, the IPCC reports almost certainly underestimate future climate impacts.
Most people would agree that it is
dishonest not to tell the buyer this information.
And
most people who have experience renting properties have had at least one bas experience with an unfair or
dishonest landlord or property owner.
I believe that «resume dishonesty» can be one of the
most foolish things a
person can do, because
dishonest additions, mischaracterizations and omissions can hurt you for the rest of your life.
Some of us may not even realize it, because our minds trick us into believing that we're better than we really are.2 Basically,
most people are consistently a little bit
dishonest about themselves, both online and offline.
So in general, there's no reason to assume that
most people will be more
dishonest if you initially encounter them online compared to encountering them offline.