For example,
most doctrinal statements include the idea that Jesus is fully human and fully divine.
While I do think that there are some things we can know with absolute certainty, I think that several ideas found on
most doctrinal statements do fall into this category.
Not exact matches
To this day (as well as when I wrote this post) I can in good conscience and with full conviction sign a
doctrinal statement like that of DTS or GES or
most any decent Bible church.
In today's blogging world, you have to be somewhat provocative to garner attention... As I mentioned above, I do believe in the value of
doctrinal statements, but in a much different way than how they are used by
most churches.
«The
most beautiful names of God» that appear in Muslim devotion have been used by Muslim theologians to express God's attributes even though they are more expressions of praise than
doctrinal statements.
Indeed, the consensus of the universal Church regarding
doctrinal decisions was, from the outset, the
most important criterion in determining whether a
doctrinal statement was to belong to the Church's binding tradition of faith.
If one believes all the right things, and can sign on the dotted line of the best
doctrinal statements that the church has ever written, but their life is full of hatred, greed, and selfishness, I would argue that while they may have eternal life, and while they may believe some good truths from the gospel, they really have not understood the
most essential parts of the gospel.
Most conservative theologies are cognitive - propositional; they claim that
doctrinal statements directly or «literally» refer to reality.
But I think there is feature of those earlier
doctrinal statements that are absent from
most creeds and confessions from today.
... typically don't have a building, a budget, a staff, a
doctrinal statement, a mission's team, a children's program, or any of the typical trappings of what
most people think of as «church.»
Even more emphatically than the «normal» unanimous judgment, «By the Court» depersonalizes and thereby institutionalizes the Court's
most important
doctrinal statements.