One of the few issues on which
most economists agree is the need for public policy to protect the environment.
If the economy picks up its growth pace, which
most economists expect, then private student loan rates will also increase.
Most economists believe that temporary corporate cuts do little or nothing to boost economic growth, because corporations can't count on the cuts in the future.
While
most economists thought short - term interest rates would end 2016 at 1.2 %, we said rates would go much higher than that, perhaps as high as 2.6 %.
Both of these points are well understood in economics and are a central part of the thinking
of most economists.
If both players act in a purely rational way,
as most economists assume people act, the game should have a predictable result.
Since
most economists see the increase of leisure as an important economic gain, I will briefly explain our decision to omit it.
But
most economists say that's unlikely, especially given we are already near full - employment with record - low interest rates.
While a recession isn't the base - case scenario
for most economists right now, concerns of a recession happening soon are high.
While most economists continue to hold that view, the recent rise in inequality has prompted a new look at [growth's] economic costs.
When asked why they did not follow
what most economists would call rational practices, they said they thought that exchanging some tokens in the collective pool was only fair.
As an example,
most economists now support action on climate change because they believe the costs of doing nothing are greater than the costs of taking action.
Most economists predict that the financial consequences of failing to raise the debt limit would be greater than a government shutdown.
And
yet most economists would agree instead with the doctrine of trade deficits and its benefits for consumers.
The level is still too high,
with most economists preferring it be under 2 % in a normal market, but improvement is improvement.
Most economists who study the economics of climate change agree that action to reduce greenhouse gas emissions is necessary.
This is the measure
most economists prefer for comparing living conditions and economic strength across countries.
Most economists work full time during regular business hours, but occasionally they work overtime to meet deadlines.
While acknowledging these costs of economic growth,
most economists assume that personal consumption still rises as gross product rises and that the defensive portions of personal consumption are negligible.
Most economists at the time saw it as a short - term labor supply issue that would soon sort itself out.
Most economists continue to project sustained moderate growth; but if a national recession takes root, that changes everything.
Most economists accept that governments should adopt fiscal policies that will lead to a «sustainable fiscal structure».
Still, support for vouchers does not match public willingness to back tax credits, even
though most economists think the difference between vouchers and tax credits more a matter of style than substance.
Most economists living in the «real world» would agree that this would be another devastating move by our government to hinder and already sluggish housing market.
Most economists believe that the corporate tax cut will add a bump up in 2018, and estimates range from 2.5 to 3 percent GDP.
Why hasn't faster job growth led to lower unemployment,
as most economists would have predicted a few years back?
But
most economists say that an utter global meltdown is unlikely — which makes a gold bubble likely.
Last year, the inventory of existing homes was around a four - to five - month supply, way below the six - to seven - month supply that
most economists consider normal.
In my opinion, and in the view
of most economists, those steps must be accompanied by a rising price on carbon emissions if we hope to stabilize atmospheric composition.
Most economists seem very willing to take this combination of evidence as a signal of a strong and virtually immediate economic turn here.
For most economists from the official, financial or even academic sectors, career risk is simply too great.
Because
most economists did not understand the depth of Mises's challenge, economists generally did not acknowledge his argument as valid until communism collapsed from 1989 to 1991.