Sentences with phrase «most ethical people»

You keep it up and someday hopefully soon people will be able to look at this branch of science and say «while they had some problems starting out they have since cleaned house and have the most ethical people in any science» while I might not agree 100 % with you Dr. Curry you have my total respect and admiration for the openness and frankness that you have put forward and continue to champion.

Despite what the so - called «religious» would have you believe, atheists are some of the kindest and most ethical people that I've ever known.

I'm one of the most ethical people you'd ever want to meet» = > and humble I must add

Incredibly sad... This man was the smartest, classiest, and most ethical person in football ever.

Not exact matches

As with most changes it takes a while for people to approve of a new norm and while it may make things difficult / uncomfortable for soldiers in the near term it will create a better, more ethical government organization in the long run.

And to live in society and even just have friends one must prove he or she is a «moral» person, this morality is just a morality that lacks gods, such as a belief that what is good is what brings about the most happiness or freedom or whatever your ethical system supports.

Humans are capable of forming ethical, well - reasoned decisions without needing to perpetuate such incoherent, closed - minded fantasy... I swear, christians are among the most frightened, baby - brained people on the planet!

Some people see simply no ethical problem at all with destroying embryos for research, and for them the study of embryos for its own sake is certainly worth public support (we support all kinds of basic research after all, rightfully so, and this basic research could be of more value than most).

I don't think the reason most people leave churches has anything to do with not believing they can become more holy or with wanting to live by different ethical standards.

What you don't consider is that for most people rights are either not a part of the ethical equation, or one part among many.

Most people live by the ethical rules of their community with minor modifications and infringements, but the vast majority adhere to the norms of their birth or acquired ethical system and community.

@Acroyear I was with you until you called christians «ordinary ethical and loving human being» they are the most intolerant, narrow - minded, self - righteous people on the planet.

For one thing, in a Jewish context «ethics» covers a much wider swath of human behavior than what most people think of when they use ethical categories.

The most honest and ethical people I have ever met.

Its ethical precepts have been the basis of moral education of most of the Chinese people for a period longer than the entire Christian era.

Our first most impressionable moment is one of suffering rather than comfort, and people wonder why the (mental, emotional, ethical) health of our nation is declining?

The people entrust us to do what is right and we have a duty to represent them in the most honest and ethical way possible.

«Most people have a route or two routes and they become like an extension of the body and use those routes not for ethical reasons but because it is the only way to get around London without being late for meetings...»

I'm left of center but I like John Faso because ethics come first with me and he's ethical and honest and smart and most important — he treats people decently — which is where Dick Brodsky — and many others — fail.

«If it will not do so then doctors must refuse to continue to be complicit but should do everything in their power to deliver ethical healthcare to these most vulnerable of people.»

Moreover, the team asserts that, «The implicit ethical values of a balance between work and play, and of a balance between thinking globally and acting locally are values which we are comfortable in advocating to any city, and which we think most people could accept.»

The most significant finding of a recent study considered by the Ethical, Legal and Social Implications Group of the US Human Genome Project was the lack of demand for testing: people don't want it (New Scientist, 18 September).

Although most people reading this essay are probably already interested in scientific integrity and the ethical issues involved in research, I have to admit that before entering the research world, I had not given the issue any real consideration.

People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) has officially declared New York the most...

rada: re: ``... because we can overcome the ethical objections to eating animal products by only sourcing animal products from ethical farmers...» No you can't overcome those objections, because here is how most people who have these ethics feel: There is no such thing as «ethical meat» on any practical level.

Yes, most ethical brands are more expensive than your run - of - the - mill fast fashion clothing store... that's because they're made with care and the people who make and produce the items are paid fairly.

jane iredale is also certified cruelty - free by PETA, People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, the most widely recognized animal welfare organization in the United States.

While this freedom is an enormous advantage for writers, and can be used to create a lot of good (think free speech, and enabling people to react to biased sources etc.), there are undoubtedly people who may not think twice about being «ethical journalists», mostly cause, well, for the most part blog authors not journalists.

Sallekhana (IAST: sallekhanā), also known as Samlehna, Santhara, Samadhi - marana or Sanyasana - marana; is a supplementary vow to the ethical code of conduct For most people the easiest practice to consistently fulfill will be the traditional one, to abstain from meat on all Fridays of the year.

There is a discomfort in exploiting the death of people for cheap scares, so most films shy away from the ethical minefield entirely.

MCC announced on Monday the appointment of its inaugural Youth Advisory Board (YAB)-- a diverse group of teens who will help shape MCC's youth - focused work by exploring some of the most pressing ethical and moral dilemmas facing young people today.

Since 1995, three of the country's most renowned psychologists, motivated by a passion to understand how people are able to maintain ethical standards and produce good work in a time of turbulent change and increasing pressure for profit, have sought to answer these questions.

Yet the message that young people typically receive today is that what matters most to colleges — and to society — is a high number of achievements, not meaningful ethical or performance virtues.

When entering an arena where self - interest dominates (like business), most people tend to develop contempt for those who are willfully naieve — it forces the ethical person into a situation where they must either to take advantage, or assume the responsibility for representing the other party's interests.

In much the same way, most investors in cigarette or alcohol companies are quite happy if ethical investors shoo people away from these companies.

Most ethical and concerned people already know what the issues are regarding puppy mills.

When animal lovers learn about the cruelty and killing that are rampant in U.S. shelters, and that national animal protection organizations such as the Humane Society of the United States (HSUS), the American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (ASPCA) and People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) defend these shelters and thwart efforts at reform, the first and the most logical question they ask is: Why?

When asked, most people want a healthy puppy from an ethical breeder.

Unlike most animal welfare advocates and people who have pets, Bekoff came to his awareness and ethical stance through science.

HSUS, People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, and other animal rights groups planted and cultivated this «most kennels are puppy mills» idea in the public consciousness to legitimize themselves in the eyes of animal lovers and to collect tens of millions of dollars in donations.

«Most people are not economists (thank God), and they have some ethical resistance to the idea of making every human interaction into a money transaction,» the professors said.

Obviously we work in a professional climate where most people simply do not give a shit about «elevating the medium» or about «making games that are more socially responsible» or more specifically about integrating moral or ethical decisions into gameplay or game narrative in order to offer deeper messages to our audiences.

According to the Purple Harry website, the avoidance of aerosols isn't just an ethical concern: «Most people don't realize that a 500 ml can of aerosol only contains approximately 200 ml of product....

It's purely a struggle over where money is going, lots of it, enough cash to dissolve the ethical underpinnings of all but the most rigidly scrupulous persons.

I get the impression people who argue that it is difficult and complicated, or try to blur lines are those for whom making the ethical choice is harder than most.

In summary, a strong case can be made that the US emissions reduction commitment for 2025 of 26 % to 28 % clearly fails to pass minimum ethical scrutiny when one considers: (a) the 2007 IPCC report on which the US likely relied upon to establish a 80 % reduction target by 2050 also called for 25 % to 40 % reduction by developed countries by 2020, and (b) although reasonable people may disagree with what «equity» means under the UNFCCC, the US commitments can't be reconciled with any reasonable interpretation of what «equity» requires, (c) the United States has expressly acknowledged that its commitments are based upon what can be achieved under existing US law not on what is required of it as a mater of justice, (d) it is clear that more ambitious US commitments have been blocked by arguments that alleged unacceptable costs to the US economy, arguments which have ignored US responsibilities to those most vulnerable to climate change, and (e) it is virtually certain that the US commitments can not be construed to be a fair allocation of the remaining carbon budget that is available for the entire world to limit warming to 2 °C.

In the absence of a court adjudicating what equity requires of nations in setting their national climate change commitments, a possibility but far from a guarantee under existing international and national law (for an explanation of some of the litigation issues, Buiti, 2011), the best hope for encouraging nations to improve the ambition of their national emissions reductions commitments on the basis of equity and justice is the creation of a mechanism under the UNFCCC that requires nations to explain their how they quantitatively took equity into account in establishing their INDCs and why their INDC is consistent with the nation's ethical obligations to people who are most vulnerable to climate change and the above principles of international law.

This question is designed to expose the ethical conclusion that nations who are put on notice by the most prestigious and responsible scientific organizations in the world that ghg emissions from their jurisdictions are causing great harm to vulnerable people around the world have an ethical duty to accept the burden of proof to prove that their ghg emissions are not causing harm.

The traits people consider to be most important for scientists to have are honesty, ethical behaviour and open - mindedness.

People Tree * is one of the most recognised ethical clothing labels.