Not exact matches
Until his death in 1918, in the midst of what was for him a tragic war between Germany and America, he helped develop one of the
most important theological -
ethical positions of modern Protestantism.
Most of A Theory of Justice works out these procedural and (hence) political - ethical consequences of the veil of ignorance and the original position, and it is this material that has occupied most commentat
Most of A Theory of Justice works out these procedural and (hence) political -
ethical consequences of the veil of ignorance and the original
position, and it is this material that has occupied
most commentat
most commentators.
Although different theories of distributive justice would reach different conclusions about what «fairness» requires quantitatively,
most of the
positions taken by opponents of climate change policies fail to pass minimum
ethical scrutiny given the huge differences in emissions levels between high and low emitting nations and the enormity of global emissions reductions needed to prevent catastrophic climate change.
Although different theories of distributive justice would reach different conclusions about what «fairness» requires quantitatively,
most of the
positions taken by opponents of climate change policies fail to pass minimum
ethical scrutiny given the huge differences in emissions levels between high and low emitting nations and individuals and the enormity of global emissions reductions needed to prevent catastrophic climate change.
And so a
position that a nation takes on atmospheric ghg atmospheric targets is necessarily an
ethical issue because nations and people have an
ethical duty to not harm others and the numerical ghg atmospheric goal will determine how much harm polluting nations will impose on the
most vulnerable.
A
position on a global ghg atmospheric stabilization target is essentially an
ethical question because a global ghg atmospheric concentration goal will determine to what extent the
most vulnerable people and the ecological systems on which they depend will be put at risk.
Although there is a growing literature on the
ethical dimensions of climate change,
most of this literature is focused on theoretical
ethical questions rather than on the injustice of
positions actually being taken about climate policies.
And so if political will is a barrier to greater use of non-fossil energy, politicians resisting greater commitment to non-fossil energy are
most likely supporting
positions that fail to pass minimum
ethical scrutiny.
The approach had a prescriptive component: value judgements about the
most effective types of family functioning made on the basis of the
ethical position described above.
That being said,
most trusted advisors get to those
positions of trust with their clients precisely because they have successfully guided said clients throught the morass of legal /
ethical / moral / financial minefields repeatedly over time... these clients don't really care any more about the nuts and bolts of the transactions, just so long as things go their ways.