Construction disputes are also amongst
the most fact and evidence heavy, technically complex and document intensive disputes in the legal world.
Not exact matches
In
fact, Career Builder recently did a study that found some alarming
evidence that
most Americans have poor spending habits
and are living paycheck - to - paycheck.
leading commentators
and economists reveal
facts and evidence of one of the
most important
and dramatic issues today... the global manipulation of the gold market.
The
fact that
most of us still feel the need to hide our identlties
and not bring it up when we are around friends
and workmates who may be believers is
evidence of the persecution we still endure.
Most people understand that you need
evidence in order to claim something to be
fact and that a theory is just that, a theory!
I would «base [my] info on inre the non-existence of God, heaven
and hell, etc» on the absolute lack of even a shred of hard verifiable
evidence for these extraordinary claims,
and the
fact that even after thousands of years of frantic
and determined efforts by the
most ardent
and intelligent proponents of these claims, they still have been completely unable to demonstrate them in any testable manner.
Whatever «historical
evidence» or «
facts» Hamdan believes himself to be remembering, this is nothing more than the infamous blood libel: the
most persistent
and longest - lived anti-Semitic myth in history, aside from the claim that the Jews killed Jesus.
The global reach, extreme influence,
and extreme importance of Christianity is largely due to the
fact that the European races, largely Caucasoid, became the world's
most dominant races as
evidenced by their conquest
and colonization of many parts of the world's major regions
and because their religion invariably happened to be some form of Christianity, consequently, they gave the greater part of the world not only their languages, their customs,
and their ideas, but also their religion including their version of what God looks like.
Last, logistics
and literary - critical
evidence gives great credence that the
most logical conclusion about the Biblical claims concerning Jesus are that they are all in
fact true.
In
fact, much
evidence for other species have been found,
and it is extraordinarily difficult to find because you can't just look up in the sky at something that still exists in order to find proof, you have to go carefully digging all over the world for stuff that has for the
most part been buried, destroyed, decayed, etc..
Obviously this process of descent has not been observed, but there exists so much overwhelming
evidence supporting it that
most scientists (
and probably all scientists in the life sciences) consider it a
fact as well.
For example, against both dualism
and reductionistic determinism
and in favor of the pancreationist, panexperientialist view that the actual world is made up exhaustively of partially self - determining, experiencing events, there is considerable
evidence, such as the
fact that a lack of complete determinism seems to hold even at the
most elementary level of nature; that bacteria seem to make decisions based upon memory; that there appears to be no place to draw an absolute line between living
and nonliving things,
and between experiencing
and nonexperiencing ones;
and that physics shows nature to be
most fundamentally a complex of events (not of enduring substances).
If you did acknowledge the
evidence and where it points, you would then be faced with the
fact that you are a sinner
and accountable to this
most Holy God
and are now going to die.
It was those who were good at building systems who built the
most fantastic
and lunatic systems, who scarfed up every odd or stray
fact and fit it in,
and found that in the
fact they could fit in such odd or stray
facts evidence that they had seen what lesser mortals couldn't, or wouldn't.
Add in the
fact that
evidence for Jesus (
and most biblical characters
and events) is non existent in the historic record.
to J.W.
and fred — i think its rather silly to argue anything as
fact if its cleary thought based (i.e. lacking proof / evidence) when asked about the where did we come from or how the universe (whatever) i always answer with i don't know, but then i pose an idea — i state openly thats its only an idea... if any one of you religions folks would simple agree to the FACT that what you BELIEVE is real is REALLY only an idea until proven (much like evolution) then i would find much more pleasing conversations beyond the realm of atheists... but alas, i am still waiting — i found some but most are imovible in there beliefs that god is real, provable, and most
fact if its cleary thought based (i.e. lacking proof /
evidence) when asked about the where did we come from or how the universe (whatever) i always answer with i don't know, but then i pose an idea — i state openly thats its only an idea... if any one of you religions folks would simple agree to the
FACT that what you BELIEVE is real is REALLY only an idea until proven (much like evolution) then i would find much more pleasing conversations beyond the realm of atheists... but alas, i am still waiting — i found some but most are imovible in there beliefs that god is real, provable, and most
FACT that what you BELIEVE is real is REALLY only an idea until proven (much like evolution) then i would find much more pleasing conversations beyond the realm of atheists... but alas, i am still waiting — i found some but
most are imovible in there beliefs that god is real, provable,
and most def.
In
fact,
most if not all of the relevant
evidence, as the previous example illustrated, counts against the idea that physics can in principle provide a complete account of the physical world, especially given the existence of human
and other animals in it.
In
fact, all my anxieties run in the opposite direction: that, in order to affirm the uniqueness of humanity within organic nature, as well as the unique moral obligations it entails, we will reject all
evidence of intentionality, reason, or affection in animals as something only apparently purposive, doing so by reference to the
most egregiously vapid of philosophical naturalism's mystifications — «instinct» —
and thereby opening the way to a mechanistic narrative that, as we have learned from an incessant torrent of biological
and bioethical theory in recent decades, can be extended to human behavior as well.
The
fact that the poor
and suffering are the ones to whom God is
most palpably revealed in biblical religion is
evidence that God's concern is that oppression, suffering
and poverty be abolished as quickly as possible.
They are a non-profit organization that brings all the
facts about whole grains to the forefront
and does all of the
evidence based research on your behalf so you, the consumer, can have the latest
and most up - to - date information on whole grains.
The NCAA needed to convince the judge that no genuine
and disputed issues of material
fact remain,
and when viewing the
evidence most favorably to the players, that the NCAA would be clearly entitled to prevail as a matter of law.
Furthermore, it is now clear that all kinds of crying (i.e. fussing, crying
and inconsolable crying) is prolonged, that this prolongation occurs only in the first few months,
and that inconsolable crying is almost unique to the first few months of life.3, 40 The «unpredictability» of the crying,
and of the caregiver's ability or inability to soothe the infant is
most likely due to the
facts that (1) the infant cry in the first few months is a reflection of the organization of its behavioural states (crying, awake alert, sleeping), rather than an intentional «signal,» 14 (2) that behavioural state changes occur in «steps» rather than due to increases or decreases in arousal7, 41
and (3) infants are resistant to behavioural state change unless they are in a transitional phase in which they are «ready» to change state.7 Finally, there is now good
evidence that the proportion of infants that have
evidence of organic disease to explain their crying is less than 5 %.8, 42,43 In the absence of other compromise, infants with «colic» have as good an outcome as infants without «colic.»
Again
most analysts
and academics know that if anyone wanted to demonstrate the strange hypothesis that multiple
and widely divergent exchange rates do not affect foreign investment, he could cite the
evidence of more recent years, but that obviously not being consistent with the
facts, our economist then went over two decades back to 1994 to cite an exception, a single investment in an environment of otherwise grossly low investment, in a sector where people invest even in times of war, to justify a faulty hypothesis!
President Mahama who believes
most of the criticisms on social media are not backed with
evidence, emphasized the need for Ghanaians to «check the
facts,
and let's not destroy the opportunities presented by social media.»
«Although there is
evidence that there was some genetic contribution from Central Asia, the genomic analysis points to the
fact that women with deformed skulls in this region are genetically
most similar to today's south eastern Europeans,
and that the Huns likely played only a minor role in directly transmitting this tradition to Bavaria,» Burger noted.
In
fact, emerging scientific
evidence suggests a high - fat, low - net carb
and low - to moderate - protein diet (in other words, a diet that keeps you in nutritional ketosis) is ideal for
most people.
This can include claims that a spouse is single when, in
fact, the spouse is still married or claims that a.
And while Match.com was the site
most commonly cited by divorce lawyers, attorneys have used other dating sites like eHarmony to gather
evidence, too..
In
fact, donors break even at
most and the best
evidence suggests that low - income families are the primary beneficiaries even in the few programs that are not means - tested.
«Assessment boils down to
evidence of learning,» but the important outcomes we should be evaluating in students are in
fact the
most «hard to measure»
and subsequently these qualities are simply not being assessed.
But as the Washington Post noted, the
evidence shows that the vouchers» effects on segregation are at
most trivial
and often mitigate racial isolation (see «The Louisiana Scholarship Program,» Check the
Facts, Winter 2014).
The
fact that skills in these areas can not be easily assessed should not trouble us since
most middle - class
and affluent children receive such an education already
and typically no one asks for
evidence that such an approach has an impact on their test scores.
Learn what the research says about how to develop expertise in this genre of writing — building an understanding of (persuasive) schema; developing stronger writing prompts for the 3 argument types (
fact - based, judgment - based, policy - based);
and teaching students how to find
and use the
most relevant
evidence (text, data, etc.) needed to support each argument / opinion type.
«The «Reading Report Card» released today provides further
evidence that the testing mania sweeping the nation fails to improve school quality
and, in
fact, damages the education of our
most vulnerable children,» said FairTest Executive Director Dr. Monty Neill.
Charter schools also had significant positive effects on the reading scores of students with special needs.13 These results are supported by additional findings that charter schools have the
most positive impacts on black
and Hispanic students,
and the least positive impacts on white students.14 In
fact, research has found some
evidence of negative impacts on white students
and non-poor Hispanic students in both math
and reading compared to their peers in traditional public schools.13 16
But, I think there is a vast difference between leveraging to purchase a personal residence
and leveraging to invest due to the
fact that
evidence suggests
most people are poor investors.
Notice that
most of them occured in the 1930s —
evidence of just how volatile the 1930s were (that
and it was also probably due to the
fact that the index traded for a lot less than it does now, which made each point worth a greater percentage).
In
fact, there is overwhelming
evidence that good oral health can keep
most dogs
and cats living two years longer than they otherwise would.
Supplementation with digestive enzymes (proteases, amylases) normally is unnecessary because these foods are highly digestible
and because there is no
evidence that healthy rabbits produce insufficient levels of these enzymes; in
fact, some of the
most important digestion is by the cecal bacteria.
An objective review may not be the
most exciting thing to read, I understand, but it does something that a number of game reviews do not — it offers the reader a chance to form their own conclusion based on the
facts and evidence presented, rather than being subtly nudged one way or another due to the reviewer's personal thoughts or veiled bias delivered via semantics.
It's bad enough how Famitsu is acting, but frankly, the
fact that Konami took issue
and snubbed Kotaku Japan in such a way is the
most damning
evidence.
The 1951 three - panel White Painting is believed to have been painted over almost immediately as Untitled [matte black triptych](ca. 1951, fig. 2).6 In
fact, there is no exhibition history or any other
evidence to indicate that White Painting [three panel] was extant between 1951
and 1968; 7 in those years,
most of the original White Paintings had slipped out of existence, their canvases used as the supports for other pieces.8 Though artists throughout history have created new works on used canvases, Rauschenberg did so with an unusual frequency
and ease, particularly in the early 1950s.9 Looking back at that period some ten years later, he commented, «Today I wouldn't do that....
You keep ignoring the
fact that there is no
evidence for methane burps associated with conditions in the relatively recent past (early Holocene, Eemian) for which there is good
evidence for warmer Arctic conditions than now,
and you are happy to extrapolate emissions of a few Tg (at
most) to values 1000 times larger on the basis of nothing very much.
Most of the
evidence says that it did
and there is little debate over the
fact that solar was increasing in this period.
He describes compelling, if circumstantial,
evidence that
most of the vandals were not farmers, as organizers of the attack had intimated (
and many media had accepted as
fact).
Having said all that, this
evidence wasn't available at the time you started & named the thread; although we may all have our suspicions, I believe it's
most helpful to just lay out the
facts and let the readers decide on others» characters based on those
facts.
For example, understanding that global warming is not a proven science
and that there is no circumstantial
evidence for global warming alarmism — which is why we see goats like political charlatans like Al Gore showing debunked graphs like the «hockey stick» to scare the folks —
and, not understanding that climate change the usual thing not the unusual thing
and that the climate change we observed can be explained by natural causes is the only thing that really separates we the people from superstitious
and ignorant government - funded schoolteachers on the issue of global warming... that
and the
fact that global warming alarmists do not believe in the scientific method nor
most of the principles upon which the country was founded.
At «A» I found leading French scientist Claude Allegre, who was one of the first to try to warn people about global warming 20 years ago, but on looking into the
facts and data now says: «Increasing
evidence indicates that
most of the warming comes of natural phenomena.»
The UCS report cited several examples of Wall Street Journal or Fox News contributors dismissing climate science, disparaging or mocking climate scientists
and cherry - picking scientific
evidence to undermine the
fact that
most scientists agree that global warming is occurring
and is driven by human activity.
This NOAA empirical
evidence is unequivocal
and indisputable, yet the mainstream media refuses to inform the American public of these
most basic climate record
facts.
Most of your readers are probably unaware of the
fact that doubling carbon dioxide in itself only produces a modest warming effect of about 1.2 C
and that to get dangerous warming requires feedbacks from water vapour, clouds
and other phenomena for which the
evidence is far more doubtful.