When the researchers broke the carbs into high and low glycemic index categories, the increased risk was even more apparent: Women who ate
the most high glycemic foods had about 2.25 times the risk of developing heart disease than women who consumed the fewest.
Not exact matches
(It's easier to research anyway)
Most of the
foods on the list are fairly low
glycemic, but if you eat them along with a
high glycemic food (
foods that convert quickly to sugar) the effect is sort of cancelled out.
most gluten
foods have a
high glycemic index which raises the blood sugar level and the fat - storing hormone insulin;
I really stay away from
most other gluten - free flours as they are
high -
glycemic and I do better with
higher - protein
foods such as almond flour.
Unlike
most «refined» carbohydrates, which are rapidly absorbed into the bloodstream, pasta has a low
glycemic index, meaning it causes smaller increases in blood sugar levels than those caused by eating
foods with a
high glycemic index.
Most people don't realize it, but refined carbohydrates like breads, pastas and crackers are all
high on the
glycemic index, and they actually cause the same things to happen in your body that sugary
foods do, even though they taste more savory than sweet.
(
Most people are unaware that the
glycemic index of whole wheat bread is among the
highest of all
foods.)
Cardiologists are discovering that «
high glycemic index» carbohydrates (sweet and starchy
foods that cause blood sugar to rise rapidly) are, by far, the
most important dietary risk factors in coronary artery disease.
High glycemic foods include white bread, cakes, doughnuts, croissants,
most crackers and
most packaged breakfast cereals.
I am finally starting to realize that now that I since don't eat animal products and eat whole
foods, my acne problem is
most likely related to some IGF - 1 or insulin sensitivity and eliminating
high glycemic index and
high glycemic load
foods.
Boxed, processed
foods and
high -
glycemic carbs are at the core of the way
most Americans eat and surprisingly, they're still seen by many people professing to be on a diet.
when you look at the loads of other plant
foods and see
most are less than 5, and that white rice he says is
high glycemic has a load of 23, a load of 21 no longer looks «low»
Just curious: respectfully, do you have any feeling / thoughts / ideas / reaction to my contensions about the
high glycemic index
foods, such as
most grains and starchy taters as perhaps being exacerbaters of your digestion sensitivities?
The article goes on to say: «
High -
glycemic foods are usually refined
foods, sugar and
most carbohydrates.
Most consumers are overly concerned with potatoes» starchy content and
high glycemic index (GI), an index of the conversion of
food in the body to blood sugar within a short time after consuming it.
Foods on low carb diet must be low
glycemic file
foods, for example,
high - fiber grains and
most vegetables and fruits.
Coconut Sugar's
glycemic index is 35, Agave Nectar's is 27, and Stevia's is 0 — all far less than
most foods (honey's
glycemic index is 55 - 60 and
high fructose corn syrup's is 62).
Most conventional pet
foods contain
high -
glycemic or fast carbohydrates such as potato and tapioca, which are recognized as a leading cause of obesity and diabetes.
The grain that ends up in pet
food may contain mold or excessive pesticide residues, so it makes sense to look for alternatives, but white potatoes and green peas (the
most common substitutes) are even
higher on the
glycemic index than grain — a serious issue for cats, who are susceptible to diabetes from the wild insulin swings these
foods cause).