It's a societal problem imposed on schools, in effect increasing the likelihood of failure — or at best sporadic success — for
most high poverty schools.
Not exact matches
As we've seen in New York, which is a few years ahead of the curve when it comes to making its tests much harder, a
higher cut score will make achievement gaps look much bigger, and the achievement of
most high -
poverty schools look much worse.
K - 12's new evaluation and pay systems focus on «effectiveness» and whether teachers teach in a
high -
poverty school, but
most pay little or no attention to what a teacher actually teaches.
As in
most other
school districts, the teachers in
higher -
poverty schools in our sample have fewer years of experience than their counterparts in lower -
poverty schools (11.8 years vs. 14.0 years).
Rothstein continually asks whether
schooling is the
most effective way to elevate students from
poverty and launch them on a road to
higher academic achievement.
Indeed, concentrated
poverty may be the single best predictor of
school performance and
high -
poverty schools remain the
most difficult nut to crack in attempts to improve educational outcomes.
A
school system with a 35 percent annual student mobility rate, with half of its students living at the
poverty line, with
most of their parents having only a
high school education — with National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) scores among the
highest in the U.S.?
It could move federal funds away from
high -
poverty schools (which get
most Title I dollars today) to low -
poverty ones;
Probably the
most convincing argument for the fundamental difference between start - ups and turnarounds comes from those actually running
high - performing
high -
poverty urban
schools (see sidebar).
Seventy percent of children in
high -
poverty schools scored below even the
most basic level of reading.
But today
most charter
schools have even
higher concentrations of
poverty than traditional public
schools.
He has co-authored nine books, the
most recent being the 2012 award - winning Turning
High -
Poverty Schools Into
High - Performing
Schools, written with Kathleen Budge.
Preliminary results from a two - year research engagement include: Newest teachers are more likely to be assigned to the least prepared students There is significant variation in Delaware teachers» impact on student test scores Teachers» impact on student test scores increases
most in the first few years of teaching A significant share of new teachers leave teaching in Delaware within four years
High poverty schools in Delaware have
higher rates of teacher turnover...
«The
most challenged
schools are
high poverty and
high minority
schools, and that's where we are struggling as a country to fulfill this promise.
Most or all parents attend
school open house events in 72 percent of
schools that have a low concentration of
poverty compared with only 28 percent of
schools with a
high poverty concentration.
In criticizing the federal regulation, for example, Weingarten claimed that «the flawed framework... will punish teacher - prep programs whose graduates go on to teach in our
highest - needs
schools,
most often those with
high concentrations of students who live in
poverty and English language learners.»
As a result, the problem the law sought to tackle is still dire: Students in
high -
poverty schools, a national survey has shown, are twice as likely to have their
most important classes taught by teachers without proper certification.
SJHA is just one of a handful of community
schools that have been dramatically closing opportunity and achievement gaps in some of Los Angeles Unified
School District's (LAUSD) toughest and
most reform - resistant,
high -
poverty neighborhoods.
In the United States, the problem is
most obvious in
high poverty urban
schools, where boys are losing sight of the girls.
Duffett and Farkas reported that this phenomenon was
most evident in
high -
poverty schools, where 34 % of AP teachers believed «administrators [were] pushing unqualified minority or low - income students into AP» and 50 % said that their African - American and Hispanic students were not adequately prepared for AP instruction.
Most of these
schools and districts have two features in common:
poverty and
high concentrations of racial minorities.
The greater focus on student growth versus mere proficiency in
most states should make it somewhat likelier for
high -
poverty schools to get decent grades, but it could also result in many
schools in affluent suburbs getting mediocre marks.
Consider the Columbus Collegiate Academy, a «no excuses»
school we sponsor, and by
most measures one of the best
high -
poverty schools in the state.
The first is the quality of teachers: Research shows that the country's best and
most experienced teachers are more likely to work in
schools with low levels of
poverty.49 On the other hand, new and inexperienced teachers disproportionately work in
high -
poverty school settings.
For two years running, it's been recognized as one of 33
high -
poverty schools making the
most academic progress in Colorado.
The
most experienced teachers, and thus the
highest paid, are much more likely to work in low -
poverty schools and serve a lower percentage of students of color.
Larger
schools with
high -
poverty student populations are
most likely to experience limited leadership — even when we control for the effects of
school level and urbanicity.
Additionally, these efforts undoubtedly contributed to positive communication of ideas across teachers, which Wilder (1977) had identified as important in
most of the effective
high -
poverty schools he studied.
The «Gifted Gap» report found that while
most high -
poverty schools offer programs for gifted students, they tend to be sparsely populated.
Unfortunately, we could not locate financial data for every PTA, so we could not identify PTA revenues for all of the
most affluent and
highest -
poverty schools.51 Based on available information, however, we expect that, with more financial information, the total PTA revenue for the
most affluent
schools would be even
higher, and students at the
highest -
poverty schools still would receive minimal parent contributions.
That's left Bell and a paraprofessional overseeing reading instruction — arguably the
most important period of the day — for the other 33 students at this
high -
poverty school.
Average district per - pupil spending does not always capture staffing and funding inequities.14 Many districts do not consider actual teacher salaries when budgeting for and reporting each
school's expenditures, and the
highest -
poverty schools are often staffed by less - experienced teachers who typically earn lower salaries.15 Because educator salaries are, by far,
schools» largest budget item,
schools serving the poorest children end up spending much less on what matters
most for their students» learning.
In both districts,
schools serving the
most affluent students received tens of thousands of dollars in additional funding each year from parents, while the
highest -
poverty schools received very little, if anything, from their PTAs.
In 2013 - 14, for example, the 10
most affluent
schools in Portland raised at least $ 750,000, while the 10
highest -
poverty schools received very little money in parent donations.
Take our first finding — the presence of large teacher salary gaps between the
highest - and lowest -
poverty schools in
most of the 20 districts.
According to previous research by the Center for American Progress,
most Americans — some 70 percent — believe that more should be done in order to integrate
high - and low -
poverty schools.
Since the mid-1990s, one increasingly employed approach for raising student achievement —
school - level adoption and effective implementation of externally developed, research - based comprehensive
school reform models — has been tried in more than 8,000
schools nationwide,
most of which are
high poverty and low performing.
High Standards for All Students: A Report from the National Assessment of Title I on Progress and Challenges Since the 1994 Reauthorization (2001) provides a comprehensive summary of the most recent data available from the National Assessment of Title I on the implementation of the Title I program and the academic performance of children in high - poverty scho
High Standards for All Students: A Report from the National Assessment of Title I on Progress and Challenges Since the 1994 Reauthorization (2001) provides a comprehensive summary of the
most recent data available from the National Assessment of Title I on the implementation of the Title I program and the academic performance of children in
high - poverty scho
high -
poverty schools.
Last year the gap between richer and poorer students reached a record
high, with pupils eligible for free
school meals — a long term indicator of
poverty — said to be less than half as likely to go on to
higher education than their
most affluent peers.
Furthermore, studies have shown that frequent principal turnover has a negative effect on
school performance and teacher retention, with those effects being
most harmful in
high -
poverty and low - achieving
schools.
«It was a very difficult year and the state was gutting the budget for public
schools so the
highest poverty areas were feeling the
most pain,» said Tuck, who was Partnership's CEO at the time.
Looking down the 2012 - 13 list of America's
most charter -
school - heavy districts, the top five look familiar —
high -
poverty urban districts such as New Orleans, Detroit, the District of Columbia, Flint, Michigan and Kansas City, Missouri.
According to a new report,
most teachers in urban,
high -
poverty schools are remarkably motivated to meet the challenges at hand, but they need and want schoolwide, principal - led supports in order to succeed in the face of the uncertainties that economic privation brings.
A recent article in EdWeek stated: «The principal's job has been called both the
most important in a
school building and the loneliest, and the stress it places on individuals is illustrated by its rapid turnover rates, especially in
high -
poverty schools»
Dr. Montecel's address,» Framing Systems Change for Student Success,» was part of a panel on the
most promising strategies to improving achievement in
high poverty schools.
Dr. Robledo Montecel sat on the closing panel which focused on: What are the
most promising strategies to improving achievement in
high poverty schools.
According to the Education Commission of the States, urban, rural,
high -
poverty,
high - minority, and low - achieving
schools face the
most persistent staffing challenges.
The
most important graphic in
School segregation didn't go away is probably the one that shows the dramatic increase in
high -
poverty schools over the past 17 years — roughly 70 percent.
Great Public
Schools Now, the outside group seeking to expand the number of LA Unified schools serving students in high - poverty neighborhoods, has released a list of district schools — most of them charters — that represents «the kinds of schools» the organization intends to replicate in the years
Schools Now, the outside group seeking to expand the number of LA Unified
schools serving students in high - poverty neighborhoods, has released a list of district schools — most of them charters — that represents «the kinds of schools» the organization intends to replicate in the years
schools serving students in
high -
poverty neighborhoods, has released a list of district
schools — most of them charters — that represents «the kinds of schools» the organization intends to replicate in the years
schools —
most of them charters — that represents «the kinds of
schools» the organization intends to replicate in the years
schools» the organization intends to replicate in the years ahead.
The analysis reveals that
schools with the
highest rates of
poverty and the lowest rates of student achievement, as well as those with
high concentrations of students of color, are the
most likely to have teachers with unsatisfactory ratings.