Sentences with phrase «most home visiting programs»

Most home visiting programs conduct developmental screenings to identify children at risk for delays and refer children for additional diagnostic assessments, evaluations, and treatment when screening uncovers possible problems.

Although the designs and eligibility criteria vary, most home visiting programs» primary objectives are to:

Most home visiting programs are voluntary, and states and communities encourage participation by families with risk for maltreatment (for example, families where parents have low levels of education, live in poverty, single - parent households, and parents who themselves were involved in the child welfare system).

Although most home visiting programs are voluntary, some states and communities highly encourage participation by families with risk of maltreatment.

Most home visiting programs are voluntary, and states and communities encourage participation by families with risk for maltreatment (for example, families where parents have low levels of education, live in poverty, single - parent households, and parents who themselves were involved in the child welfare system).

Not exact matches

The most widespread home - visiting program in the country today is one that focuses primarily on health: the Nurse - Family Partnership, which sends trained nurses into the homes of low - income expecting mothers, mostly unmarried teenagers.

The most effective intervention we have is a focus on parental attachment, through a public policy of home visit programs, starting in the first days of a child's life.

This was part of what I found most poignant, the idea that with home visit programs and other types of coaching, even poor, and very stressed parents can be motivated to change how they treat infants and toddlers.

Research shows that families typically receive roughly half of the number of home visits expected.16, 17 For example, across three randomized controlled trials conducted of Nurse Family Partnership, average dosage of visits ranged from 45 to 62 percent.18 Research also shows that many, perhaps most, families enrolled in home visiting programs drop out before their eligibility ends.16, 19,20 Some home visiting studies have varied the dosage that families were offered and found that fewer home visits produced outcomes similar to higher levels of exposure.21

Most trials of prenatal home visiting have produced disappointing effects on pregnancy outcomes such as birth weight and gestational age, 9,16,17 although one program of prenatal and infancy home visiting by nurses has reduced prenatal tobacco use in two trials18, 19 and has reduced pregnancy - induced hypertension in a large sample of African - Americans.20

As we learn more about the mechanisms for these impacts, both direct and indirect, research will demonstrate the most effective approach to link home visiting services and early childhood education and child care programs to more fully realize positive outcomes.

HHS's maternal, infant, and early childhood home visiting program: Which program models identified by HHS as «Evidence - Based» are most likely to produce important improvements in the lives of children and parents?

In New Jersey's regional central intake system, providers use uniform referral and screening forms to link families to community supports, including the most appropriate home visiting program.

Carol Raphael, President and CEO of the Visiting Nurse Service of New York, the state's oldest and largest home care agency, said, «The Visiting Nurse Service of New York applauds Governor Cuomo's call for a thoughtful, collaborative approach to restructuring the State's Medicaid program; we are prepared to work with him and his Administration toward the enactment of policies that focus on coordinating care to the State's most vulnerable patients, who often suffer from multiple complex conditions.»

The most recent research on the program showed that, after being visited frequently by a nurse during their child's first two years of life, the mothers were less likely to abuse or neglect their children, have another child, and abuse drugs or alcohol than mothers who did not receive home visits.

Teachers in the CPC program have at least a bachelor's degree along with a certification in early childhood education.18 Staff compensation is relatively high compared to most preschool staff, mirroring the salary schedule of the Chicago Public School system, which reduces teacher turnover.19 In addition to teachers and classroom aides, students also are monitored by parent volunteers, home visit representatives, clerks, nurses, speech therapists, and other administrative staff who are associated with the public school program.

The program is designed for people who can keep a dog or cat in their home during the week and place it up for adoption at CAP on the weekend, a time when most potential adopters visit the shelter.

His most recent work focuses on the field of home visiting, as he is co-leading two national studies of home visiting programs for disadvantaged mothers.

There are several different models for coordinated intake: in most cases, coordinated intake workers conduct outreach to families and complete the Coordinated Intake Assessment Tool (CIAT), which collects program eligibility information before referring families to an appropriate home visiting program, or other community services.

Participants in voluntary home visiting programs are typically new and expectant mothers, many of whom are single, low - income teenagers who need these supports the most.

In general, the research shows that home visiting programs have the greatest, albeit still modest, effect on parents» support for children's learning and in reducing the prevalence of child maltreatment, but that these effects are strongest for the most disadvantaged program participants.

Thus CFRP is studying how, when, and why families leave home visiting programs; which families are the most likely to leave; and how father involvement in the programs relates to family retention.

Unlike the proposed House reauthorization bill — Increasing Opportunity through Evidence - Based Home Visiting Act (H.R. 2824)-- the Senate version does not include a state match requirement — viewed as harmful to the program by most advocacy groups.

Those sectors of society that are most likely to accrue benefit in future cost savings from the social and educational effects of home visiting should contribute to the funding of programs.

The wide variability in programs makes it difficult to draw solid conclusions about the conditions under which home visiting is most effective.

Most notably, home - visited families participating in Early Head Start reported experiencing significantly less stress in their parenting roles than did control families.95 The same pattern occurred in Queensland: mothers who received home - visiting services reported less stress in the parenting role than did mothers in the control group.96 Healthy Families programs in Alaska, San Diego, and Hawaii also examined parenting stress in their evaluations.

For example, substantial evidence exists that families most plagued by domestic violence are least likely to respond to home - visiting support.23 Other factors that hamper success of home visiting include limited family resources, family mental illness, and families not motivated to participate in the programs.24 Thus, the very risk factors that make children vulnerable interfere with the effectiveness of the programs that are designed to help them.

They can enhance developmentally oriented anticipatory guidance with individualized content that meets families» individual needs.42 Home - visiting programs include a «degree of social support that is difficult to provide in most clinical settings; outreach and liaison between the pediatrician, the family, and the community; involvement with socioeconomic issues that directly affect the well - being of the child and family; reinforcement and follow - up of preventive care, peer helper support, as well as encouragement by the home health visitor who has the advantage of being with the family in its own home, a more accepting, less threatening setting for the famiHome - visiting programs include a «degree of social support that is difficult to provide in most clinical settings; outreach and liaison between the pediatrician, the family, and the community; involvement with socioeconomic issues that directly affect the well - being of the child and family; reinforcement and follow - up of preventive care, peer helper support, as well as encouragement by the home health visitor who has the advantage of being with the family in its own home, a more accepting, less threatening setting for the famihome health visitor who has the advantage of being with the family in its own home, a more accepting, less threatening setting for the famihome, a more accepting, less threatening setting for the family.7

Although most outcomes were reviewed at program completion to observe the effects of a high - intensity comprehensive treatment program for low - birth - weight infants, 39 certain outcomes were examined after the first year and provide a test of the home - visiting component on its own.40

Nurse Family Partnership (NFP) is one of the most rigorously evaluated home visiting programs in existing literature.

While Home Visiting programs are not the only option for reducing the occurrence of ACEs, they are one of the most feasible.

However, for both child abuse and parent stress, the average effect sizes were not different from zero, suggesting a lack of evidence for effects in these areas.108 Earlier meta - analytic reviews have also noted the lack of sizable effects in preventing child maltreatment — again citing the different intensity of surveillance of families in the treatment versus control groups as an explanation (though the authors did report that home visiting was associated with an approximately 25 percent reduction in the rate of childhood injuries).109 Another review focusing on the quality of the home environment also found evidence for a significant overall effect of home - visiting programs.110 More recently, Harriet MacMillan and colleagues published a review of interventions to prevent child maltreatment, and identified the Nurse - Family Partnership and Early Start programs as the most effective with regard to preventing maltreatment and childhood injuries.

Next we turn to a discussion of the outcomes of home - visiting programs, with a focus on those outcomes that are most relevant to preventing child abuse and neglect.

This brief synthesizes the findings of the research to highlight which outcomes home visiting programs are the most likely to improve and for whom.

Because the most at - risk families may also be the most difficult to reach in center - based settings, home visiting programs are at an advantage in that the very same high - risk families they need to target are the same families they may be better suited to reach.

Many home visiting programs aim to educate parents about the importance of supporting children's early learning through frequent reading and a stimulating home environment and provide parents with the tools to support their children's early learning.15 In general, evaluations of home visiting programs show fairly positive impacts on parents» support for children's learning, though the evidence is strongest for the most disadvantaged program participants (e.g., poor, unmarried teens; very - low income participants).

Home visiting programs should have the greatest and most immediate impact on parenting outcomes relative to child outcomes because home visiting programs target parenting directly as a mechanism of change in childHome visiting programs should have the greatest and most immediate impact on parenting outcomes relative to child outcomes because home visiting programs target parenting directly as a mechanism of change in childhome visiting programs target parenting directly as a mechanism of change in children.

Most trials of prenatal home visiting have produced disappointing effects on pregnancy outcomes such as birth weight and gestational age, 9,16,17 although one program of prenatal and infancy home visiting by nurses has reduced prenatal tobacco use in two trials18, 19 and has reduced pregnancy - induced hypertension in a large sample of African - Americans.20

For the most part, home visiting programs have largely been shown to be ineffective at increasing rates of well - child visits and immunizations (Table 2).

If home visiting programs target the most at - risk families (i.e., young and poor parents, parents with a history of child maltreatment), the research suggests that these programs may positively influence parents» support of their children's learning and reduce rates of child maltreatment.

Finally, home visiting programs that promote high quality parent - child relationships and combined with high - quality early education programs are most likely to result in better school readiness outcomes for children.

In general, the research shows that home visiting programs have the greatest, albeit modest, effect on parents» support for children's learning and in reducing the prevalence of child maltreatment, but that these effects are strongest for the most disadvantaged program participants.

HHS's maternal, infant, and early childhood home visiting program: Which program models identified by HHS as «Evidence - Based» are most likely to produce important improvements in the lives of children and parents?

One of the most extensively conducted randomised controlled trials of an early childhood intervention program in Europe has shown that a home visiting program combined with the Triple P — Positive Parenting Program improved children's cognitive develprogram in Europe has shown that a home visiting program combined with the Triple P — Positive Parenting Program improved children's cognitive develprogram combined with the Triple P — Positive Parenting Program improved children's cognitive develProgram improved children's cognitive development.

Although most states were already implementing home visiting programs, MIECHV increased the use of evidence - based models to deliver care to high - risk families.

New Early Childhood Comprehensive Systems grant... home visiting programs respond to Zika crisis... the impact of perinatal depression and steps we are taking to build capacity to address the most common risk factor in pregnancy and more!

«Home visiting programs are pro-family, voluntary, and most importantly, they work,» said James M. Hmurovich, President & CEO of Prevent Child Abuse America.

First, parent support programs improve parental competence / confidence and parental beliefs that child - initiated interactions are most important in parent - child interactions.7, 8 Second, although general parent support programs support social - emotional development of children, parent support that is directed at parental emotional and educational / economic development has an enhanced impact on child social - emotional development.9 Third, participatory help - giving practices contribute the most to parents» judgment of their children's emotional competence.7 Fourth, group approaches to parental support have a more powerful effect on child social - emotional competence than home - visiting approaches.9

In 2014 - 2015, the program provided information and referral services to 7,700 Oregon families, and intensive home visiting to more than 2,500 of our most vulnerable families.

If MIECHV funding isn't continued, our state won't be able to provide high - quality and proven home visiting programs to hundreds of Washington families with young children who are living in some of the most challenging situations.