Sentences with phrase «most humans are basically»

@Pope on a Rope: Well, THIS atheist believes that a.) most humans are basically good, b.) Predator 2 is better than the original, and c.) Brussels sprouts are delicious.

Not exact matches

Unfortunately, Plantinga, himself, has not explicitly acknowledged the fact that his analysis of the relationship between divine sovereignty and human freedom is basically an attack upon, not a defense of, the view of omnipotence that most classical theists seem to hold; moreover, many such classical theists seem not yet to have perceived this tension for themselves.

Basically, this is another episode in the most expensive live action Saturday morning show in human history.

It assumes that human life is fundamentally practical; hence, knowledge is not most basically the correspondence of some understanding of reality with «reality - as - it - is,» but it is a continual process of analysis, explanation, conversation, and application with both theoretical and practical aspects.

The Basingers believe «that most influential classical theists — e.g., Augustine, Aquinas, Luther, Calvin — have affirmed I - omnipotence»; they go on to say that «unfortunately, Plantinga, himself, has not explicitly acknowledged the fact that his analysis of the relation between divine sovereignty and human freedom is basically an attack upon, not a defense of, the view of omnipotence that most classical theists seem to hold.»

Steve: It is an excellent point; I mean, John, you quote Eric Kandel in your article and Eric Kandel won the Nobel prize for his groundbreaking research into memory and that work was done with a sea slug and basically they have teased out the most basic workings of memory in an invertebrate and these other folks like Kurzweil think that within his lifetime, you're going to be able to understand all the workings of the human brain to the point where you can basically replicate it.

I found myself surprised at how well FighterZ managed to make characters stand out, even when most of them are basically just humans wearing a gi or space armor.

What bothered me most was that the two human sides of the main conflict basically wanted the same goal (pacification of the ice world) and that their differences could largely have been resolved with a little thinking and no fighting.

The human enemies are basically a joke when compared to the animals and machines you'll encounter, as a simple headshot on most will take them out, and what one arrow doesn't kill, a quick strike or two from the lance will finish off the rest.

I think that you would be asking a lot of human nature to assume that any reviewer, however objective he or she may try to be, will remain completely unbiased when assessing a paper which basically calls into question their most recent — and most widely known work.