Sentences with phrase «most immigration court»

In co-operation with the Gutierrez Law Firm, which is headquartered in San Antonio (where most immigration court proceedings must be held for Central Texas cases), Dunnam & Dunnam is dedicated to upholding the rights of individuals who wish to enter the United States on a temporary or permanent basis, helping ordinary people realize their dreams and aspirations.

Not exact matches

What it might mean for entrepreneurs: Immigration policy is one of the country's most divisive issues right now, and the court's ruling underscores how important the debate remains.

For most of the hour - long session, the court's conservatives appeared skeptical about imposing new limits on the president's national - security powers over immigration.

Examples abound, but here are two: the Oriental Exclusion Act (1924), which prohibited most immigration from Asia, including foreign - born wives and the children of American citizens of Chinese ancestry; and United States vs. Bhaghat Singh Thind (1923), in which the Supreme Court ruled that Indians from the Asian subcontinent can not become US citizens.

The Supreme Court has struck down most of Arizona's immigration law.

The memo, which was circulated to prison governors on November 26th, reads: «The criminal casework directorate (CCD) of the Border and Immigration Agency have confirmed to us that as a rule they have no interest in pursuing foreign national prisoners serving sentences of less than 12 months for deportation unless they have a court recommendation for deportation, are already subject to deportation proceedings, or (in the case of non-EEA nationals) were sentenced to less than 12 months but where the current sentence plus one or two previous sentences within the last five years (taking account of the most significant sentences during the period) total 12 months or more.»

The US Supreme Court will consider a legal challenge to President Obama's overhaul of the nation's immigration rules, determining the fate of one of his most far - reaching executive actions.

«While I understand and respect the point of view of conservatives who have been opposing him, Trump is, in fact, the most conservative candidate running for president on a wide range of issues, including immigration, jobs, taxes, Supreme Court appointments and regaining our image as a world leader,» Long said.

In the wake of the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals» recent decision to uphold most of the state's immigration enforcement legislation, Senate Bill 4, we renew our call for the San Antonio Independent School District to provide meaningful protections for our undocumented students and their families, and ask that our district make ensuring the safety of our most vulnerable community members its top priority.

Consequently, most of these children, often with limited education and English skills, confront immigration judges and government attorneys alone in court.

What is the most challenging aspect of defending clients in US Immigration Court and how do you overcome this?

Even then, there are some circumstances in which suspicionless stops are acceptable to the Supreme Court, most notably in roadblock - style checkpoints for enforcing sobriety or immigration.

And most significantly, the decision humiliates the parties — using their poverty, immigration status and dependence on Ontario Disability Support as a reason to see their case as unworthy of the court's consideration.

Most significant has been last week's decision by Justice Russel Zinn of the Federal Court in Construction and Specialized Workers» Union, Local 1611 v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration).

Melvin was most recently an immigration analyst with Guberman Garson LLP Deloitte in Toronto, where he assisted with Federal Court litigation and a wide range of immigration services to clients from various industries, including engineering, hospitality, and information technology.

Most recently she is a member of a working group aiming to pilot a dedicated new court for migrant & trafficked children which crosses these children involvement in family, crime and immigration law.

The judgment in AG (Eritrea), handed down on 31 July 2007, is the most recent Court of Appeal decision to give detailed consideration to the approach which immigration judges should take in relation to proportionality under Art 8 of the Convention.

Even if the hardship assessment did apply to a child — and the Supreme Court states unequivocally that it does not — Poulton says that the immigration office wasn't applying the assessment properly, with perhaps the most obvious example being the casual dismissal of the boy's mental condition.