I am claiming that if it were in god's nature to deem using a computer
the most immoral act imaginable, then that is completely arbitrary.
Not exact matches
Not only is it impossible to anticipate in such a code every possible variable or potential dilemma, but always «it is possible to satisfy the letter of the law while still committing an
act that
most reasonable people would consider unethical or
immoral.»
However, religion (not just Christianity) is essentially
immoral: it strips the individual of the uniquely individual duty to determine, and
act upon, the
most ethical, necessarily subjective, behavior possible.
The Russian foreign ministry said the move was an «
immoral and provocative
act» and would be met with «the
most serious consequences».
But his real crime — the
immoral act that hurt the
most people, the
most seriously — will incur no direct penalty, and garner no jail time.
In «Experiencing the Banality of Evil in «Papers, Please»», Scott Juster mentions how moments like these in Papers, Please are meant to reinforce the idea that, in real life, and often in the
most tragic circumstances,
immoral acts are committed when morality falls to the whims of bureaucracy.
Since the internationally illegal
acts for which individual criminal responsibility has been established were also morally the
most objectionable and the persons who committed them were certainly aware of their
immoral character, the retroactivity of the law applied to them can not be considered as incompatible with justice.