Sentences with phrase «most judges heard cases»

That rule once made sense, in the days when most judges heard cases ranging from admiralty to -LSB-...]

Not exact matches

WASHINGTON — Judge Ruth Bader Ginsburg gave tepid support during hearings on her nomination to the U.S. Supreme Court to the most crucial precedent that governs cases involving religion and the public schools.

Most family law cases take between 1 to 3 years to be heard by a judge and many people understandably do not want to wait this long.

The judges I've interviewed over the years give various responses to the question, but what I most often hear is this: a precise description of the questions presented in the case or the statement of the issues.

Involves a Judge: For the most part, a case must be heard and determined by a judge (yes you can go before Masters and the like but they can't make final ordJudge: For the most part, a case must be heard and determined by a judge (yes you can go before Masters and the like but they can't make final ordjudge (yes you can go before Masters and the like but they can't make final orders).

Most states employ a «state central panel» system of administrative adjudication where the judges are not embedded in individual agencies but are instead housed in a central panel of judges who hear the cases from all or most of the various state agencMost states employ a «state central panel» system of administrative adjudication where the judges are not embedded in individual agencies but are instead housed in a central panel of judges who hear the cases from all or most of the various state agencmost of the various state agencies.

Many, if not most, of these hearings are simply opportunities for the lawyers to ask the judge for another hearing, and to get more time to work on the case.

The most damaging proposal is that judges alone should hear unfair dismissal cases.

By far the most damaging suggestion made in the teeth of opposition from the overwhelming majority of those consulted is the decision that most unfair dismissal cases should be heard by judge alone.

Most dockets are overloaded with cases, so many times the first hearing on a case is a judge's first opportunity to really dig into the facts of the case.

Neil Rose further explains how this pilot project works: ``... the three stages of the online court would be: [One] An automated online triage stage designed to help LiPs articulate their claim in a form which the court can resolve, and to upload their key documents and evidence; [Two] A conciliation stage, handled by a case officer; and [Three], a determination stage, where those disputed cases which can not be settled are determined by a judge, by whichever of a face - to - face trial, video or telephone hearing or determination on the documents is the most appropriate.»

Most judges will allow pro bono attorneys to have their cases heard first.

The High Court hearing was in front of Mr Justice Warby (who, as of 1 March 2017, is in charge of the new Media and Communications List within the Queen's Bench Division of the High Court, and so effectively will be the Judge most likely to hear libel cases).

While you may have been led to believe through the media that most cases are regularly heard before a judge and jury, the reality is that most cases are settled out of court.

Traffic, failure to appear, and failure to pay fines are cases that don't necessarily need to be heard in court, yet are the most common cases that judges hear.

In most states, however, it appears that there is no clear spousal support policy, and the award, if any, in any given case is the result of which judge is assigned to hear the matter.

Personal Testimony: The applicant technically does not need to testify, but it is advisable in most cases, because the judge needs to hear that the applicant is remorseful for the crime and has repented from prior bad behavior.

I am informed by counsel, in this and in other cases, and by other Queen's Bench judges, that applications for anonymity are now made in most approval hearings, if the order has not already been made by the Master.

Some judges have found that by referring, for example boundary disputes to mediation, they relieve themselves of having to hear the most tiresome and futile cases in their lists.

Now, in what lower appeal court judges have called a «most troubling appeal» and a «most unfortunate circumstance,» the Supreme Court will hear on Tuesday the case that asks when and under what circumstances a judge can copy the submissions of a party without attribution.

He returned to the firm in 2018 after spending five years as a trial court judge handling primarily family and criminal matters, including serving as the presiding judge for family matters in the judicial district of Stamford / Norwalk at Stamford, where some of the nation's most sophisticated financial family law cases are heard.

Under the ethical rules and guidelines in place in most states, judges must disclose any campaign donations from parties or attorneys before their courts, and they must refrain from hearing a case if it would give rise to «impropriety or the appearance of impropriety.»

Unlike most small claims court cases heard throughout the country, there is certainly no meaningful way to appeal what any of these TV judges decree.

While today you don't have to travel hundreds of miles by dogsled to hear cases as your predecessor judges based in Alaska once did, you probably now have the most grueling commute of any federal appellate judge to arrive at the locations where your court regularly hears oral arguments.

This program provides strategies for handling cases that bear some of the most challenging issues that judges hear.

If I get the evidence of speed excluded the Judge or Hearing Officer will most likely have to throw out the case.

Mediation works so well, with over 80 percent of court cases that mediate reaching agreement, most judges require couples try mediation before hearing the case.

In most states, however, it appears that there is no clear spousal support policy, and the award, if any, in any given case is the result of which judge is assigned to hear the matter.