Sentences with phrase «most modern humans»

The regions inhabited by Neanderthals overlapped with early Homo sapiens for some period of time, and interbreeding is confirmed: most modern humans have between 1 % and 4 % Neanderthal DNA.

Most modern humans, having strayed far from their evolutionary diets, are metabolically deranged, with misguided or disrupted leptin pathways.

Today most modern humans are lucky if they get 8 grams daily.

On the other hand fossil OH 62 proves that «habilis ``, far from being Homo - like, was small and ape - like - these cases were the very opposite of what evolution theory predicted and expected.103 Even though the brain size of WT 15000 was smaller than most modern humans, it was still larger than quite a few people living today.

This is smaller than most modern humans but by no means all of them, and it is larger on average than pygmies.

«The environments that most modern humans live in are very different than the conditions our ancestors faced 50,000 years ago,» Capra said.

May 24, 2013 — Most modern human mothers wean their babies much earlier than our closest primate relatives.

This is supported by anthropological data showing that most modern human populations engage in polygynous marriage.

Not exact matches

LeadGenius uses a unique combination of the most modern data science technology and skilled human researchers working in concert with each other on client - defined B2B marketing and sales data projects.

Vertebrates 505 Tetrapods 395 Amniotes, 340 Mammals 220 Mammals that birth live young (i.e. non-egg-laying) Placental mammals (i.e. non-marsupials) 125 Supraprimates, bats, whales, most hoofed mammals, and most carnivorous mammals Supraprimates (primates, rodents, rabbits, tree shrews, and colugos) 100 Primates, colugos and tree shrews Primates and colugos79.6 Primates 75 «Dry - nosed» (literally, «simple - nosed») primates (a-pes, monkeys, and tarsiers) 40 «Higher» primates (or Simians)(a-pes, old - world monkeys, and new - world monkeys) «Downward - nosed» primates (a-pes and old - world monkeys) 30 A-pes 28 Great a-pes (Humans, chimpanzees, bonobos, gorillas, and orangutans) 15 Humans, chimpanzees, bonobos, and gorillas 8 Genera H - omo and Australopithecus 5.8 Contains only the Genus H - omo 2.5 Humans 2.5 Modern humans 0.5 Fully anatomically modern humaHumans, chimpanzees, bonobos, gorillas, and orangutans) 15 Humans, chimpanzees, bonobos, and gorillas 8 Genera H - omo and Australopithecus 5.8 Contains only the Genus H - omo 2.5 Humans 2.5 Modern humans 0.5 Fully anatomically modern humaHumans, chimpanzees, bonobos, and gorillas 8 Genera H - omo and Australopithecus 5.8 Contains only the Genus H - omo 2.5 Humans 2.5 Modern humans 0.5 Fully anatomically modern humaHumans 2.5 Modern humans 0.5 Fully anatomically modern humaModern humans 0.5 Fully anatomically modern humahumans 0.5 Fully anatomically modern humamodern humanshumans 0.2

The modern European person is the most expensive human species in this world.

Vertebrates 505 Tetrapods 395 Amniotes, 340 Mammals 220 Mammals that birth live young (i.e. non-egg-laying) Pl - acental mammals (i.e. non-marsupials) 125 Supraprimates, bats, whales, most hoofed mammals, and most carnivorous mammals Supraprimates (primates, rodents, rabbits, tree shrews, and colugos) 100 Primates, colugos and tree shrews Primates and colugos 79.6 Primates 75 «Dry - nosed» (literally, «simple - nosed») primates (apes, monkeys, and tarsiers) 40 «Higher» primates (or Simians)(a-pes, old - world monkeys, and new - world monkeys) «Downward - nosed» primates (apes and old - world monkeys) 30 A-pes 28 Great a-pes (Humans, chimpanzees, bonobos, gorillas, and orangutans) 15 Humans, chimpanzees, bonobos, and gorillas 8 Genera H - omo and Australopithecus 5.8 Contains only the Genus H - omo 2.5 Humans 2.5 Modern humans 0.5 Fully anatomically modern humaHumans, chimpanzees, bonobos, gorillas, and orangutans) 15 Humans, chimpanzees, bonobos, and gorillas 8 Genera H - omo and Australopithecus 5.8 Contains only the Genus H - omo 2.5 Humans 2.5 Modern humans 0.5 Fully anatomically modern humaHumans, chimpanzees, bonobos, and gorillas 8 Genera H - omo and Australopithecus 5.8 Contains only the Genus H - omo 2.5 Humans 2.5 Modern humans 0.5 Fully anatomically modern humaHumans 2.5 Modern humans 0.5 Fully anatomically modern humaModern humans 0.5 Fully anatomically modern humahumans 0.5 Fully anatomically modern humamodern humanshumans 0.2

In agreement with most nonteleological expressions in the liberal political tradition, this theory affirms that rights articulate a universal or natural moral law; but, against the persisting weight of the modern natural law tradition, the universal right to general emancipation is not bound to the assertion that human rights are independent of any inclusive good.

When Bertrand Russell stated at Columbia University in 1950 that Christian love or compassion was the thing most needed by modern humans, he moved revealingly close to declaring intellectual bankruptcy on his and many others» behalf.

They believe that modern theory — the theory of conscious constructionism or abstract individualism — has totally transformed human lives in a most unnatural direction.

I don't consider myself «postmodern» or «emerging» but most of the postmodern / emerging philosophy and theology I have read is a reaction against a modern philosophy and theology which overemphasized «the many» (the human ability to figure things out on our own), and as a result, is not too humanistic, but is almost excessively spiritual.

When modern theorists envisage man as a being who knows what he wants, or who at least possesses an «unconscious» that knows for him, they may simply have failed to perceive the domain in which human uncertainty is most extreme.

Darwin's theory of evolution, as understood by most of the modern scientific community, has nothing to say about the «gap» between humans and «lower» animals, because no such gap is recognized.

Indeed, most cultures in human history have generated no such marvel as the modern scientific movement, and even in our own culture, scientifically oriented as it is supposed to be, most people accept the benefits of technology and use the vocabulary of science but do not in fact choose to abide by the disciplines that alone make scientific productivity possible.

Most important, at a time in human history when there is urgent need for wisdom to guide us through a crisis of unparalleled proportions, it removes any interest in wisdom from the intelligentsia in general and the modern university in particular.

Of all the views of man and his purpose that were expressed in the ancient world, that of ancient Israel most nearly conforms to the modern knowledge of the human condition.

And the fact is that two Catholic priests, Gregor Mendel, O.S.A., and Georges Lemaitre, were pivotal figures in creating two of the most important scientific enterprises of the twenty - first century: modern genetics, which is giving humanity previously unimaginable powers over the human future; and modern cosmology, which is giving us glimpses of the universe in the first moments of its existence.

Many people think not; and to account for this slackening impulse in the highest and most complete of human mystical beliefs they argue that the evangelical flowering is ill - adapted to the critical and materialist climate of the modern world.

In all these ways it expressed a modern liberal ideal that contrasted with the hierarchical domination and exclusiveness of most of the human past.

It is well known that some of the most significant atheism in the modern intellectual world has been aroused because of the apparent impossibility of reconciling the idea of God with the fact of human freedom and creativity.

Human nature comprises evil as well as good, and that has never been shown to be more obvious than in this century, when 6 million Jews were killed by the most important, modern nation in the world, the most democratic, and the most intellectually and educationally advanced.

Most of these «Abephobes» are libertarians and neo-Confederates who blame Lincoln for a host of modern ills; some, it seems, also idealized Lincoln as youths and became permanently disillusioned after learning that he was not wholly above the usual run of human flaws.

From the most primitive of savages to the sophisticated modern, the urge to «speak» to an Other not human would appear to be almost universal.

I have found their ideas to be faithful not only to important religious intuitions of ultimacy but also to the demands of common human experience, logic and, most importantly for our purposes, modern science.

Nietzsche, the greatest modern master of understanding man, has taught us an ironical and intimately human mode of listening, and this listening is often most effective when it listens to what is not said.

Perhaps best known for his text on the sociology of religion, The Sacred Canopy, Berger has also shown a keen interest in issues of development and public policy and in the nature of religious belief in the modern world, as evident in A Far Glory: The Question of Faith in an Age of Credulity (1992) and in his most recent book, Redeeming Laughter: The Comic Dimension of Human Experience.

However, the strongest and most persistent single criticism of Ezekiel from modern commentators is precisely here in the charge that the proclamation of redemption betrays no more of human compassion and gentleness than his treatment of the theme of destruction.

Until recently, half of the human race died from infectious causes before adulthood, providing strong selective pressure for genetic alleles that enhance host defence but why are the genetic alleles that are most frequently associated with depression so common in the modern gene pool?

To our ears such words sound very like the most blatant human imperialism toward the rest of nature, as does the divine commission to man in Genesis 1:28; and in modern times they may have fostered such an attitude and been used as a divine «exploiters» charter» to justify it.

According to Radner, modern liberal notions of human rights enabled the more authentic realization of Christian charity in history, most dramatically in the abolition of slavery.

The most important reason, Mahoney tells us, is Solzhenitsyn's understanding of «the permanent propensities of the modern mind»» namely, the fatal attraction to utopian ideologies and the totalitarian temptation to radically alter human nature.

Given that St. Thomas» theological project is both materially and intentionally open ended, and given that the Magisterium recognises that philosophy must take adequate account of the advances of modern science, if one could demonstrate that the perspective proposed by Holloway and now by Faith movement and magazine fulfilled all of the criteria mentioned above - i.e. it is a unified vision of the Catholic faith that gives due place to the role of human reason without blurring the distinction between nature and grace and one that presents our revealed faith uncompromisingly and in its entirety - one could justifiably claim that the Faith vision is totally coherent with, if not the total content of St. Thomas» theology, then most certainly the aims and intentionsset out in Aeterni Patris.

For most people in modern Britain, the basic definition of what is human is increasingly confused and conflictual.

Today, modern refineries have chemically altered most salt making it hazardous for human consumption.

Modern scientific research shows that salting the eggplant is not actually removing most of the bitter compounds, but the added salt at least decreases the human tongue's perception of bitterness, very much like how adding a little bit of salt to bad coffee improves the taste.

While online support groups can serve as a springboard for meeting other mothers, modern technology will never be able to replace the human hug as the most ideal form of understanding and encouragement.

As the world is becoming more international in its relations, that is an increasingly less realistic goal, even though it can not be denied that the idea carries a lot of appeal to modern humans as their behavior and decision - making has evolved in tribal contexts over most of their biological existence.

This is the same argument that Robert Mugabe used to suppress the human rights of LGBT people in Zimbabwe; that the former president of Nigeria, Goodluck Jonathan, used when he signed the most dangerous law against LGBT people in the modern world; and that President Yoweri Museveni used in a ceremonial signing of the anti-gay bill in Uganda.

«The emergence of modern human behavior is one of the most important debates happening now,» says archaeologist Daniela Rosso of the University of Bordeaux and University of Barcelona.

Most people are now familiar with the traditional «Out of Africa» model: modern humans evolved in Africa and then dispersed across Asia and reached Australia in a single wave about 60,000 years ago.

But by far the bulk of the scientific literature hand - wrings, ponders, and philosophizes about the most familiar form of the Frankenstein myth, which Shelley flicked at in her «Modern Prometheus» subtitle: the idea that mad scientists playing God the creator will cause the entire human species to suffer eternal punishment for their trespasses and hubris.

«What has emerged from our study as well as from other work on introgression is that interbreeding with archaic humans does indeed have functional implications for modern humans, and that the most obvious consequences have been in shaping our adaptation to our environment — improving how we resist pathogens and metabolize novel foods,» Kelso says.

One of the most important early Neandertal sites was discovered in modern - day Croatia in 1899, when Dragutin Gorjanovic - Kramberger, Director of the Geology and Paleontology Department of the National Museum and Professor of Paleontology and Geology at Zagreb University, alerted by a local schoolteacher, first visited the Krapina cave and noted cave deposits, including a chipped stone tool, bits of animal bones, and a single human molar.

In fact, most modern breeds are the result of humans breeding cats for their favorite hair patterns.

Most scientists thought that the capability for such symbolic thinking was unique to modern humans, but a new study suggests that it dates back to before the Neandertals.