Hays defines reason more narrowly than
most moral philosophers do.
Not exact matches
The political
philosophers Amy Gutmann and Dennis Thompson reject not only Tutu's invocation of religion and charged that, by seeking to transform the attitudes, emotions, and
moral judgments of citizens, he improperly imports soulcraft into statecraft and transgresses the autonomy of citizens — contemporary liberalism's
most sacrosanct value.
Like
most modern thinkers, Rousseau has an enormous amount of confidence in the ability of the «
moral law within» (to quote another Rousseauian
philosopher) to point each of us in the right direction.
There is in
most of us a spark of reason, and much was achieved for universal human
moral standing by the great Stoic
philosophers who emphasized this logos in us all.
That's one of the
most fundamental differences, I think, between a deeply conservative position and a strictly libertarian one: conservatives think that for all its merits, the right we have to choose in the marketplace needs to be shaped by virtue and ordered by a
moral order (I never tire of pointing out that Adam Smith thought himself a
moral philosopher).
Although the complex
moral ability called courage, highly honored by the ancients and ignored by
most non-existentialist modern
philosophers, is not directly named by Whitehead, it is directly implicated throughout his works in discussions of tragedy and heroism.
Since one of the
most famous exponents of process thought has called the western notion of substance a chief cause of
moral evil and selfishness in the western world (WVR 6), it is astonishing that another famous process
philosopher should have tried a reconciliation between process thought, with its emphasis on relations and actions, and Aristotelian substantialism, with its emphasis on things and states of being.3
Most modern theories of
moral reasoning, he learned, were powerfully shaped by one of two great
philosophers: Immanuel Kant and John Stuart Mill.
This conference will bring together many of his friends, colleagues, and other leading living
moral philosophers in order to honor his memory and make progress on those questions he believed matter
most.
Derek Parfit was «thought by many to be the
most original
moral philosopher in the English - speaking world» (The New Yorker).
This is one of the best pieces I have read in a long time, combining the insights of one of the best climate scientists (Pierrehumbert) with those of our
most challenging
moral philosopher, Peter Singer.