Not exact matches
At the core of my essay was the proposition that Jesus» teaching about the
law was ambiguous, and that he could
most reasonably be understood as affirming the
law, and that the changes he wrought as the
normal stuff of rabbinical exegesis.
The
most striking fact is that constitutional
law academicians were able to draw on the reputation and expertise of legal professional elites through their transnational networks, and with their backing to represent to both parliamentary and Executive politicians that the judicialisation of politics, already
normal in the West, was the only legitimate model of judiciary - democratic power relations.
First, I would like to thank you for caring enough about this issue to raise it in the context of elections, and keep animal cruelty on the agenda, despite so many failed attempts to get Canadian
law up to speed with what
most Canadians would consider
normal regulation.
Since he had
normal gait
most of the time, I «brought him out» for a short series of shows, but following Murphy's
Law, he limped at those shows.
UNCITRAL considers the New York Convention to be one of the
most important United Nations treaties in the area of international trade
law and the cornerstone of the international arbitration system.4 Since its inception, the Convention's regime for recognition and enforcement has become deeply rooted in the legal systems of its Contracting States and has contributed to the status of international arbitration as today's
normal means of resolving commercial disputes.
The
most comprehensive statement of this so - called doctrine of «conditional supremacy» is found at Paragraph 67: «Following the coming into force of the 1972 Act the
normal rule is that the domestic legislation must be consistent with EU
law.
(That is, some people are concerned and some people think it's
normal or desirable, including
most law enforcement people...)
Whereas e-mail has previously been deemed by the ABA to, in
most circumstances, to provide a «reasonable» level of security, in a post-Snowden era
law firms should be viewing strong encryption for electronic communications and, where possible, old - fashioned face - to - face meetings, as a new
normal for what constitutes «reasonable efforts» to maintain confidential communications.
I'd worked in divorce
law long enough to know that these were the outlier cases — the seemingly impossible cases that were beyond what
most would consider a «
normal» divorce — they were family destroyers.
After all,
most of them (not all) are fairly smart individuals, know and understand the
law and deal in complex negotiations as part of their
normal daily activities.