Sentences with phrase «most obvious answer»

Steals While grabbing the lunch special to go may be the most obvious answer for solo travelers looking to save money, there is value to be ferreted out for singles by leveraging dining deals designed for couples.

The most obvious answer is it means children not in inclusive settings are precluded from receiving the most powerful evidence - based practice available for improving their peer related social skills.

The most obvious answer would appear to be homonegativity (the prejudice formerly known as homophobia)!

The most obvious answer to «What should I write for a Car Salesman position?»

Isn't that the most obvious answer?

The most obvious answer is that legal department strategic partnership is about lawyers learning to align their thinking and their practices with the executive perspective and business practices of the internal corporate clients they serve.

The first and most obvious answer is of course: better lawyers (and paralegals).

While advertising is generally seen as the most obvious answer because it is so prevalent, depending on your target audience and overall marketing goals it may not be appropriate for your firm.

The most obvious answer is that being a scientist and a bureaucrat are mutually exclusive.

But right now the priority is to deal with dangerous climate change, so we want high growth of renewable energy as the most obvious answer.

Probably the most obvious answer for the most obvious reasons...

I still to this day have no idea what happened to it, but the most obvious answer is I either a) accidentally left it somewhere, or b) it was stolen.

I guess the most obvious answer here is that the PS4 version isn't running as good as it can be if it looks like the Xbox One version.

To me this would seem the most obvious answer.

The most obvious answer seems to be: to garner support for Australia's War on Cats.

The most obvious answer is the ongoing problem of positive identification such as tattoo or microchip every time, for every clearance.

The most obvious answer to me is that people by nature are more inclined to complain than to praise.

The most obvious answer is to be prepared for sudden disaster - and not just the type of earthquake that might, say, delay the World Series.

The most obvious answer to this question is probably big - city settings: Wall Street, the technology company campuses of San Jose, or — if you're very lucky — the roulette tables of Las Vegas.

The most obvious answer is people who want their transactions to remain anonymous and who do not want to be censored by, say, a government.

So how to keep these prized possessions safe?A tablet case is the most obvious answer.

The most obvious answer would be to develop an SUV that packs power in the vicinity of what the Bentayga has.

The first and most obvious answer would be the introduction of a new V - 8.

The most obvious answer to that is the original series, «Scooby - Doo, Where Are You!»

A few is the most obvious answer.

Social media like Facebook seem to be the most obvious answer.

The most obvious answer is obviously that they dated your best friend, but there are so many more.

The most obvious answer is economic: it is very expensive.

The most obvious answer is that older fathers are more settled, further ahead in their careers and more financially stable than younger counterparts, giving sons access to better resources (like laptops) and a better education.

But the most obvious answer is the exploding number of youngsters who are pursuing the sports.

Perhaps the most obvious answer to this question is the same as to «Why do some houses sell and some houses don't?»

Better - quality cover seems to be the most obvious answer, particularly with Champions League football to consider.

The most obvious answer is to wear a mouthpiece and a helmet with appropriate padding on the inside, to keep your head up, only hit what you can see, and don't lead with your head.

The most obvious answer would be that Luke did not know these facts and that he had to stop writing when his information ran out.

The most obvious answer lies in our competing secular environment.

The most obvious answer here would be that the Litecoin and Bitcoin codebases are extremely similar, which made it easy for Abra to port their technology over to the alternative blockchain.

Perhaps the most obvious answer to the uptick in uranium prices lies simply in the actions of uranium producing companies to bolster their balance sheets and remain profitable in the low spot and term price environments.

The most obvious answer is that short term interest rates can't fall below zero (or some bound close to zero) and this inhibits full adjustment.

I think the most obvious answers is that I want them to find it entertaining; that «s the reason why I think we all write, is to entertain people.

Not exact matches

But, like Paiji says, most people don't walk around with their laptops — so mobile is the obvious answer.

History repeatedly provides the same answer (which, like most discoveries, only seems «obvious» after you've figured it out).

The obvious answer to yesterday's question was that when asked what was the most important commandment, Jesus mentioned several.

It seems to me that if the answer seems to be actually kind of obvious, then it most probably is.

The answer is obvious when we remember that this is the same party establishment that forgot that most Americans were not business owners.

Hundreds of ideologies, the most obvious being Marxism, have attempted to answer this question.

It now seems obvious to most Americans that «throwing money» at the problem of poverty is not the answer.

Nevertheless, for all his artful linguistic deconstruction, Amar has no effective answer for the most obvious question of all: If in fact the framers of the Amendment intended to apply the Bill of Rights against the states, why didn't any of them say so?

Not in a way that obvious is the most simple answer and therefor are the hardest and best to find but more like when a pundit and or fan falls back on quotes < (I forget the name of it)

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

The more obvious question to ask and for me the most important question Arsene has to answer is why our best players are on the fence about committing their future to Arsenal?