This recusal underlines
the most obvious contradiction about Richard Dawkins and the cultural war in which he has so much to contribute: You can be the world's greatest apostle of scientific rationalism, but if you come across as a rottweiler, Darwin's or anybody else's, when you enter that marketplace, it's very hard to make the sale.
Not exact matches
The
most obvious flaw is Lighters, not because it's too commercial etc. but because that is not what Bad Meets Evil are, it's a huge
contradiction, usually I love a bit of introspectiveness but it's not what I want from this duo.
The shriller, nastier and more ad - hominem his attackers become, the more apparent it is that they are trying to drown out what must be
most obvious in their own minds — that they have bought into a cult of belief far removed from science and reality, so full of confirmation bias and
contradiction that the only way to maintain its momentum is to constantly stoke it with fear and hyperbole.