Sentences with phrase «most obvious question»

The share of new homes started with these features has been increasing consistently for 3 or 4 years, and the most obvious question is «why?»

The most obvious question you might ask yourself about the offer is whether it meets your salary requirements and desires for future growth.

Now the next most obvious question is will it bend?

To answer the most obvious question, «Is it the unplayable mess everyone says it is» the answer would be «No, but kinda yes, except for when it works.»

The most obvious question, then, was whether or not From Software was making a new entry in its long - running mecha series.

The most obvious question in the history of obvious questions: is Rocksteady working on a sequel to the almost universally acclaimed Batman: Arkham Asylum?

The first and most obvious question: Is that family or individual ready to take on a pet?

Like many corporate releases though, it raises just as many questions as it answers... including the most obvious question:

In this case, Spier concludes that he ``... failed to ask the most obvious question: does this product offer good value for money?»

Now that we've admitted there's a problem, the most obvious question is why?

This is probably the most obvious question with an even more obvious answer.

The most obvious question people will have about this new version of Spider - Man is how it differs from the previous trilogy, which starred Tobey Maguire and was directed by Sam Raimi.

Sadly, we have been nutritionally misled and forget to ask the most obvious question.

The most obvious question here is: Is this correlation or causation?

The most obvious question is whether they will be using English at all.

Yet, the most obvious question is still queried daily among the followers of Europe's most prestigious of clubs, how would Barca fare without their superstar «false 9»?

Nevertheless, for all his artful linguistic deconstruction, Amar has no effective answer for the most obvious question of all: If in fact the framers of the Amendment intended to apply the Bill of Rights against the states, why didn't any of them say so?

Apart from those justifications, no solution could be found for the most obvious question that occurs to one at once on examining any historical event; that is, How did millions of men combine to commit crimes, murders, wars, and so on?

Another example of Cameron's failure to prepare for the most obvious questions telegraph

This is one of the most obvious questions that occur to men and the reasons behind them are quite obvious too.

In the event you do get some traction from your media kit, you will have already provided answers to the most obvious questions, and can quickly get into questions with more substance.

PC: I want to ask you what may be one of the most obvious questions: since you've painted so many large paintings, do you differentiate greatly between size and scale?

One of the most obvious questions to ask at an interview is about career progression, and you should, of course, ask this because you really want to know, but this question can also give you an insight into the company you are applying for.

You may have your answers all lined up for the easiest and most obvious questions, but before you get ahead of yourself, think about all the curveball questions that might come your way.

From «tell me about yourself» to naming your biggest weakness to revealing what you hope to be doing five years from now, it's often the most obvious questions that candidates spend the least time preparing.

We faced too many issues, trying to help job seekers answering the most obvious questions.

Not exact matches

This raises the obvious question as to when is the right time to consider long - term structural changes, which would improve retirement savings for most Canadians?

Most obvious is the question that should follow the common disparagement of gold, a question that somehow is never asked.

That this has had the most profound impact on our politics is obvious: The American culture war, which is one of the preeminent issues - beneath - the - issues, shapes the public discourse on both domestic and foreign - policy questions every day.

The obvious answer to yesterday's question was that when asked what was the most important commandment, Jesus mentioned several.

Thus it is crucial that we focus our discussion here on the question of the ontological status, (that is the question of the «reality») of life and mind, the most obvious instances of allegedly «emergent» phenomena.

The most obvious of these questions is whether there is any final meaning to the cosmic process of which our lives seem to be such a transient and insignificant moment.

The difficulty of those questions stems most of the time from being unable to reconcile the obvious nonsense of religion with reality.

With obvious and intelligent concern Dr Plunkett raises one of the most important questions that faces Christians today.

There is no question, then, that Hartshorne's theory of analogy, however similar to classical theories, is free of some of their most obvious and intractable difficulties.

Hundreds of ideologies, the most obvious being Marxism, have attempted to answer this question.

But we live in strange times, when even the most obvious things are being called in question.

To me, the most obvious passage related to this question is found at the end of Acts 20.

Perhaps the most obvious is the question of miracles.

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

The more obvious question to ask and for me the most important question Arsene has to answer is why our best players are on the fence about committing their future to Arsenal?

This a complicated question in some ways, but it's simple in the most obvious: No, you shouldn't try to play three sports in high school.

When the question is asked as to who is the most prolific goal scorer in the history of the San Jose Earthquakes, the obvious answer is Chris Wondolowski.

The most obvious and probable answer to the question is to use the Iceman, Eidur Gudjohnsen, in the space behind the lead striker.

Perhaps the most obvious answer to this question is the same as to «Why do some houses sell and some houses don't?»

But if Scotland waits for independence to begin this process it is likely that many of the fundamental aspects of the new Scottish Constitution will have been settled — Scotland's currency, aspects of its economic policy, and its relationship with the EU are only the most obvious of the questions that will have been resolved by this point.

But through it all, he fails to address what to us is the most obvious and compelling question of all, the question that has been presenting itself, unbidden, in our minds for the past several months: Is Eliot Spitzer still hot?

If the genetic mutation that gives people with Laron syndrome their short stature also protects them against two of the most pernicious diseases of aging, diabetes and cancer, then it prompts two obvious questions: What other diseases might the mutation protect against, and do people who carry the mutation in fact live longer than their unaffected peers?

As most galaxies are known to contain monster black holes, the obvious question is: How do black holes affect the evolution of galaxies and vice versa?

Yes, the obvious questions that make the most sense are often missing.