Sadly,
most of us modern humans are living with chronic stress, and this is leading to diseases [1] like hypertension, obesity, heart disease and diabetes.
Not exact matches
LeadGenius uses a unique combination
of the
most modern data science technology and skilled
human researchers working in concert with each other on client - defined B2B marketing and sales data projects.
In agreement with
most nonteleological expressions in the liberal political tradition, this theory affirms that rights articulate a universal or natural moral law; but, against the persisting weight
of the
modern natural law tradition, the universal right to general emancipation is not bound to the assertion that
human rights are independent
of any inclusive good.
They believe that
modern theory — the theory
of conscious constructionism or abstract individualism — has totally transformed
human lives in a
most unnatural direction.
I don't consider myself «postmodern» or «emerging» but
most of the postmodern / emerging philosophy and theology I have read is a reaction against a
modern philosophy and theology which overemphasized «the many» (the
human ability to figure things out on our own), and as a result, is not too humanistic, but is almost excessively spiritual.
Darwin's theory
of evolution, as understood by
most of the
modern scientific community, has nothing to say about the «gap» between
humans and «lower» animals, because no such gap is recognized.
Indeed,
most cultures in
human history have generated no such marvel as the
modern scientific movement, and even in our own culture, scientifically oriented as it is supposed to be,
most people accept the benefits
of technology and use the vocabulary
of science but do not in fact choose to abide by the disciplines that alone make scientific productivity possible.
Most important, at a time in
human history when there is urgent need for wisdom to guide us through a crisis
of unparalleled proportions, it removes any interest in wisdom from the intelligentsia in general and the
modern university in particular.
Of all the views of man and his purpose that were expressed in the ancient world, that of ancient Israel most nearly conforms to the modern knowledge of the human conditio
Of all the views
of man and his purpose that were expressed in the ancient world, that of ancient Israel most nearly conforms to the modern knowledge of the human conditio
of man and his purpose that were expressed in the ancient world, that
of ancient Israel most nearly conforms to the modern knowledge of the human conditio
of ancient Israel
most nearly conforms to the
modern knowledge
of the human conditio
of the
human condition.
And the fact is that two Catholic priests, Gregor Mendel, O.S.A., and Georges Lemaitre, were pivotal figures in creating two
of the
most important scientific enterprises
of the twenty - first century:
modern genetics, which is giving humanity previously unimaginable powers over the
human future; and
modern cosmology, which is giving us glimpses
of the universe in the first moments
of its existence.
Many people think not; and to account for this slackening impulse in the highest and
most complete
of human mystical beliefs they argue that the evangelical flowering is ill - adapted to the critical and materialist climate
of the
modern world.
In all these ways it expressed a
modern liberal ideal that contrasted with the hierarchical domination and exclusiveness
of most of the
human past.
It is well known that some
of the
most significant atheism in the
modern intellectual world has been aroused because
of the apparent impossibility
of reconciling the idea
of God with the fact
of human freedom and creativity.
Most of these «Abephobes» are libertarians and neo-Confederates who blame Lincoln for a host
of modern ills; some, it seems, also idealized Lincoln as youths and became permanently disillusioned after learning that he was not wholly above the usual run
of human flaws.
From the
most primitive
of savages to the sophisticated
modern, the urge to «speak» to an Other not
human would appear to be almost universal.
I have found their ideas to be faithful not only to important religious intuitions
of ultimacy but also to the demands
of common
human experience, logic and,
most importantly for our purposes,
modern science.
Nietzsche, the greatest
modern master
of understanding man, has taught us an ironical and intimately
human mode
of listening, and this listening is often
most effective when it listens to what is not said.
Perhaps best known for his text on the sociology
of religion, The Sacred Canopy, Berger has also shown a keen interest in issues
of development and public policy and in the nature
of religious belief in the
modern world, as evident in A Far Glory: The Question
of Faith in an Age
of Credulity (1992) and in his
most recent book, Redeeming Laughter: The Comic Dimension
of Human Experience.
However, the strongest and
most persistent single criticism
of Ezekiel from
modern commentators is precisely here in the charge that the proclamation
of redemption betrays no more
of human compassion and gentleness than his treatment
of the theme
of destruction.
Until recently, half
of the
human race died from infectious causes before adulthood, providing strong selective pressure for genetic alleles that enhance host defence but why are the genetic alleles that are
most frequently associated with depression so common in the
modern gene pool?
To our ears such words sound very like the
most blatant
human imperialism toward the rest
of nature, as does the divine commission to man in Genesis 1:28; and in
modern times they may have fostered such an attitude and been used as a divine «exploiters» charter» to justify it.
According to Radner,
modern liberal notions
of human rights enabled the more authentic realization
of Christian charity in history,
most dramatically in the abolition
of slavery.
The
most important reason, Mahoney tells us, is Solzhenitsyn's understanding
of «the permanent propensities
of the
modern mind»» namely, the fatal attraction to utopian ideologies and the totalitarian temptation to radically alter
human nature.
Given that St. Thomas» theological project is both materially and intentionally open ended, and given that the Magisterium recognises that philosophy must take adequate account
of the advances
of modern science, if one could demonstrate that the perspective proposed by Holloway and now by Faith movement and magazine fulfilled all
of the criteria mentioned above - i.e. it is a unified vision
of the Catholic faith that gives due place to the role
of human reason without blurring the distinction between nature and grace and one that presents our revealed faith uncompromisingly and in its entirety - one could justifiably claim that the Faith vision is totally coherent with, if not the total content
of St. Thomas» theology, then
most certainly the aims and intentionsset out in Aeterni Patris.
For
most people in
modern Britain, the basic definition
of what is
human is increasingly confused and conflictual.
Modern scientific research shows that salting the eggplant is not actually removing
most of the bitter compounds, but the added salt at least decreases the
human tongue's perception
of bitterness, very much like how adding a little bit
of salt to bad coffee improves the taste.
While online support groups can serve as a springboard for meeting other mothers,
modern technology will never be able to replace the
human hug as the
most ideal form
of understanding and encouragement.
As the world is becoming more international in its relations, that is an increasingly less realistic goal, even though it can not be denied that the idea carries a lot
of appeal to
modern humans as their behavior and decision - making has evolved in tribal contexts over
most of their biological existence.
This is the same argument that Robert Mugabe used to suppress the
human rights
of LGBT people in Zimbabwe; that the former president
of Nigeria, Goodluck Jonathan, used when he signed the
most dangerous law against LGBT people in the
modern world; and that President Yoweri Museveni used in a ceremonial signing
of the anti-gay bill in Uganda.
«The emergence
of modern human behavior is one
of the
most important debates happening now,» says archaeologist Daniela Rosso
of the University
of Bordeaux and University
of Barcelona.
Most people are now familiar with the traditional «Out
of Africa» model:
modern humans evolved in Africa and then dispersed across Asia and reached Australia in a single wave about 60,000 years ago.
But by far the bulk
of the scientific literature hand - wrings, ponders, and philosophizes about the
most familiar form
of the Frankenstein myth, which Shelley flicked at in her «
Modern Prometheus» subtitle: the idea that mad scientists playing God the creator will cause the entire
human species to suffer eternal punishment for their trespasses and hubris.
One
of the
most important early Neandertal sites was discovered in
modern - day Croatia in 1899, when Dragutin Gorjanovic - Kramberger, Director
of the Geology and Paleontology Department
of the National Museum and Professor
of Paleontology and Geology at Zagreb University, alerted by a local schoolteacher, first visited the Krapina cave and noted cave deposits, including a chipped stone tool, bits
of animal bones, and a single
human molar.
In fact,
most modern breeds are the result
of humans breeding cats for their favorite hair patterns.
«If you look at the viruses that are the biggest threats
of modern times,
most of them were unknown through
human history: HIV, SARS, Ebola.
While it is widely accepted that the origins
of modern humans date back some 200,000 years to Africa, there has been furious debate as to which model
of early Homo sapiens migration
most plausibly led to the population
of the planet — and the eventual extinction
of Neanderthals.
But archeologist Alexander Marshack
of Harvard's Peabody Museum says it's
most likely the artist was a more
modern human, since known Neanderthal artifacts to date, aside from tools, have been limited to things like beads and worked ivory.
I always suspected that Neandertals and anatomically
modern humans interbred, based on a simple observation:
humans are the
most sexual
of all the primates, willing and able to do it just about anywhere, anytime, with anyone (and even with other species if the Kinsey report is to be believed in its findings about farmhands and their animal charges).
Modern humans get
most of their energy from starchy grains or plant roots.
«To me, one
of the
most exciting discoveries to come out
of that analysis [
of the Neandertal genome] was that there was admixture between
modern humans and Neandertals.
Yet the vast majority
of studies in the
human - related sciences are not based on field research, and the
most field - oriented disciplines, such as sociology and cultural anthropology, have been least receptive to the
modern evolutionary perspective.
Population geneticist Laurent Excoffier
of the University
of Bern in Switzerland agrees that Out
of Africa is still the
most plausible model
of modern human origins, noting that the alleged admixture did not continue as
moderns moved into Europe.
Flo is «one
of the
most complete fossils found anywhere until you get to true burials, like in Neanderthals and early
modern humans,» says Jungers, who has been closely involved in Homo floresiensis research.
The bones account for
most of the
human fossils ever discovered from the Middle Pleistocene, the period 120,000 to 780,000 years ago during which
modern humans, Neanderthals and Denisovans split into distinct lineages.
Denisovans, Neanderthals and
modern humans descend from the same population
of ancestors, who
most likely lived in Africa between 550,000 and 765,000 years ago.
Most debates about the Châtelperronian — which begins about 40,000 years ago — have revolved around whether Neandertals invented it or simply copied the behavior
of incoming
modern humans.
Not only did captive monkeys lose
most of their natural wild gut bacteria, but they very consistently all acquired the same new and less diverse set
of bacteria — the same bacteria living in our own
modern human guts.
Most modern studies
of bipolar disorder have concentrated on the brain's cortex, the largest part
of the brain in
humans, associated with higher - level thought and action.
They conclude that, like
most other living Eurasians, Aborigines descend from a single group
of modern humans who swept out
of Africa 50,000 to 60,000 years ago and then spread in different directions.
When they compared the anatomical details
of the Misliya specimen with those
of fossils belonging to
modern humans and their relatives, the jawbone grouped
most closely with H. sapiens.