That's because scientists have presumed that
most of the aerosols from minor eruptions do not rise beyond the troposphere, the layer of Earth's atmosphere where weather occurs and where natural processes quickly clear particles from the atmosphere.
My (nonexpert) recollection is the high latitude eruptions would mean
most of the aerosols would end up in the hemisphere of the eruption.
Of course the rapid industrialization occurred mostly in the northern hemisphere and
most of the aerosols were emitted there and thus this is where you would expect the cooling to have occurred.
It takes a couple of years for
most of the aerosols from a large volcanic eruption to settle out of the air, so their cooling effect likewise lasts a couple of years.
You could also ask Andrew Revkin to withdraw his still - standing claim that
most of the aerosols in atmospheric brown clouds are due to biomass burning.
In fact, since as you can see,
most of these aerosols are in the norther hemisphere, one would expect that, if cooling were a big deal, the northern hemisphere would have cooled vs. the southern, but in fact as we will see in a minute exactly the opposite is true — the northern hemisphere is heating much faster than the south.
Not exact matches
This is due to the mostly contractual nature
of therelationships with their customers, which for the
most part is cheifly supported by the drinks industry, but also includes
aerosol cans used for hair and shaving products.
A key giveaway that
aerosols were behind the effect was that the lightning was
most pronounced at times
of the year when powerful atmospheric convection currents form that can carry the
aerosol particles high into the sky (Geophysical Research Letters, doi.org/cc7b).
Most projections say tighter regulations, cleaner sources
of electricity and higher - mileage vehicles will cut industrial emissions enough by the end
of this century that farm emissions will be starved
of the other ingredients necessary to create
aerosols, she said.
So says world's
most prominent geoscientist, Markku Kulmala, professor
of physics at the University
of Helsinki, Finland, and head
of the
Aerosol and Haze Laboratory at the Beijing University
of Chemical Technology, China.
«One reason that we haven't appreciated the role
of aerosols in the climate system is that many —
most — models don't include
aerosol - cloud interactions,» including only a handful
of those used in IPCC's fifth assessment report, released in 2014.
A few
of the main points
of the third assessment report issued in 2001 include: An increasing body
of observations gives a collective picture
of a warming world and other changes in the climate system; emissions
of greenhouse gases and
aerosols due to human activities continue to alter the atmosphere in ways that are expected to affect the climate; confidence in the ability
of models to project future climate has increased; and there is new and stronger evidence that
most of the warming observed over the last 50 years is attributable to human activities.
In 2009, for example, the Royal Society reported that
aerosols sprayed into the sky were one
of the cheapest and
most effective methods.
However,
most datasets do not provide information about the layered structure
of clouds and
aerosols.
But
most is the result
of human actions, in the form
of sulphate
aerosols from burning fuels.
The team conducted
most of the study's experiments during the summer
of 2012 in Karlsruhe, Germany, at the
Aerosol Interaction and Dynamics in the Atmosphere (AIDA) facility — a former nuclear reactor that has since been converted into the world's largest cloud chamber.
Published in the Proceedings
of the National Academy
of Sciences, the study shows that in the
most polluted areas
of northern and eastern China,
aerosol pollution is reducing the potential for solar electricity generation by as much as one and a half kilowatt - hour per square meter per day, or up to 35 percent.
Jack added: «Dust is one
of the
most important
aerosols for both the climate and the biology
of an environment, and so understanding the amount
of dust produced, and the distance and direction it travels is vital to allow us to understand its effect better.»
Among the
most uncertain elements in climate models are the effects
of aerosols and their interactions with clouds — just the things involved in albedo modification — she says.
Most of these are derived from studying the modern atmosphere, which is heavily polluted with
aerosols such as airborne soot.
Preliminary analyses show that
most of the pollution was sulphate
aerosols — along with dust and carbonaceous particles such as black carbon.
Previous studies with primates suggest that
aerosols of most biothreat agents, which are particles dispersed in the air, are infectious.
Most of the uncertainty is related to
aerosol effects.
To deal with that,
most sucessful scientists develop networks
of «trusted» sources — people you know and get along with, but who are specialists in different areas (dynamics, radiation, land surfaces,
aerosols, deep time paleo etc.) and who you can just call up and ask for the bottom line.
However, there are lots
of disagreements discussed here — in regard to climate sensitivity, hurricanes,
aerosols, climate modelling etc. but
most of these are serious discussions amongst people who are genuinely trying to come to an answer.
The 2006 paper on SPLAT II is the second
most cited in
Aerosol Science and Technology, the 4th ranked journal in mechanical engineering and the official journal
of the American Association for
Aerosol Research.
Most of the non-model estimates
of climate sensitivity are based on the analyses using other forcings such as solar and
aerosols, and the assumption that sensitivity to CO2 will be the same, despite the differences in way these forcings couple to the climate system.
(e) Estimated temperature response to anthropogenic forcing, consisting
of a warming component from greenhouse gases, and a cooling component from
most aerosols.
Most studies consider a range
of anthropogenic forcing factors, including greenhouse gases and sulphate
aerosol forcing, sometimes directly including the indirect forcing effect, such as Knutti et al. (2002, 2003), and sometimes indirectly accounting for the indirect effect by using a wide range
of direct forcing (e.g., Andronova and Schlesinger, 2001; Forest et al., 2002, 2006).
For example, the simulations show that equatorial injections
of sulfuric acid at high altitudes — where
aerosols have a longer residence time — are the
most effective at reflecting incoming radiation per unit
of sulfur.
Why it matters:
Aerosol processes — how they behave and interact with clouds in the atmosphere — are among the
most important — yet
most difficult to simulate, aspects
of climate modeling.
In addition, model intercomparison studies do not quantify the range
of uncertainty associated with a specific
aerosol process, nor does this type
of uncertainty analysis provide much information on which
aerosol process needs improving the
most.
Most sulfate
aerosols rise in the Northern Hemisphere as a result
of industrial activity, such as burning coal.
Making matters worse are the common things that damage our lungs, and we are exposed to
most of these every day: scented products, candles, cleaning agents, chlorine via bathing & swimming, the off - gassing
of items such as carpets and plastic items, formaldehyde, flame retardant, dust, paint, solvents, pollen, pesticides,
aerosol products, air fresheners, and airborne microorganisms... oh my!
The
most common means
of transmission is through
aerosols generated by horses with cough; therefore, infection can spread many feet, particularly in closed airspaces.
Bitter sprays can be purchased from
most pet stores or on - line and typically come in the form
of a pump spray or
aerosol containing a liquid that is designed to have an unpleasant taste.
Simple Solution Urine Destroyer Simple Solution, the
most experienced stain and odor cleaning company with 30 years
of science behind it — and the greatest oxy fighting and enzymatic technology in the market — has introduced Simple Solution Urine Destroyer with an innovative continuous
aerosol delivery spray designed to inject liquid down into the carpet and beneath the surface.
This new body
of work is perhaps his
most outlandish work in a quartz - century journey using
aerosol and a vast range
of different media.
By the mid-1970s
most of the creative standards in
Aerosol Art had already been established, and the genre began to stagnate.
In this case, large amounts
of sulphate
aerosols (small particles) are injected into the stratosphere by large explosive eruptions (the
most recent one being Mt. Pinatubo in 1991).
With a small amount
of LW penetrating into the first three meters and a normal mid-ocean Wind and Wave complex
most of the radiant energy is also returned to the atmosphere if not as direct heat then in the form
of warm salt
aerosols?
This is one
of the reasons why the
most confident statements in IPCC are made with respect to the «Anthropogenic» changes all together since that doesn't require parsing out the (opposing) factors
of GHGs and
aerosols.
And the sort
of FF burned during the first half
of the 20th century was produced by the fuel
most likely to generate sulfate
aerosols: coal.
What it shows is the effect
of the structural uncertainty in individual GCMs (meaning that some
of them are systematically high, others systematically low, due to flaws in the representation
of the physics;
most probably related to discretization / parametrization effects for clouds and / or
aerosols).
Aerosol processes are among the
most uncertain, and
most studied, aspects
of climate and these experiments (they bombarded a clean mixture
of water, SO2, O3 and air with high energy UV and saw small H2SO4 droplets form) might be useful in adding to that field.
Probably not the
most relevant one, though, given that the main point
of the Shindell et al paper was methane's indirect effect on
aerosols.
If «The
most extreme scenario postulated in TAR» is almost solely dependent on GHG emissions, why would the introduction
of aerosol effects not change the results?
There are an ever increasing number
of these «indirect effects», but the two
most discussed are the
aerosol / cloud opacity interaction (more
aerosols provide more sites for water to condense in clouds, thus cloud droplets are smaller and clouds become more opaque), and the cloud lifetime effect (smaller droplets make it more difficult to make drops big enough to rain, and so clouds live longer).
The
most extreme scenario postulated in TAR (A1F1) already has a big reduction in sulphate
aerosol forcing, and so the temperature changes by 2100 are almost purely a function
of the GHG forcing.
Other work shows that shipping is one
of the
most significant sources
of aerosols to the Arctic, thus influencing climate there.