Sentences with phrase «most of the scholar»

I find this funny, because most of the scholars I have read in my own research and study do not share Kaiser's opinion.

The professionals we hire are exclusively aware of the aspect that most of the scholars like you have to manage several uncertain issues when they are assigned with a lengthy and tough Singapore finance assignment.

Time constraints: Most of the scholars ask for assistance because they think that much time will be wasted, and thus instead of carrying out the necessary tasks on their own, they chose to get aid.

As Financial accounting theory is a huge subject, most of the scholars end up taking help with accounting theory assignment writing.

Most of the scholar perusing their profession in human resource management looks for human resources assignment help.

It is not as simple as writing a standard essay or a term paper, but it is an unknown writing exercise for most of the scholar.

Most of the scholars pursuing their higher studies are choosing business development programs to earn degrees in it.

Due to the bunch of nomenclatures that survive in arts, most of the scholar in the UK and USA face difficulties in understanding the concept of the subject hence find it difficult to write an assignment.

Not exact matches

The world's most popular digital currency exchange, Coinbase, is under fire from angry customers over its decision not to support a new version of bitcoin that could also make it vulnerable to «ruinous legal trouble,» according to a prominent legal scholar.

I'm grateful to be active in a time that future scholars will likely regard as one of the most tumultuous and revolutionary in history.

One of the most fortunate events in my life was to study under four brilliant economists at Stanford, who also formed my dissertation committee - Ronald McKinnon, an influential and original scholar in international economics; Thomas Sargent, a leading «rational expectations» theorist; John Taylor, also a «rational expectations» macroeconomist (currently serving in the Bush administration, and a leading candidate to succeed Alan Greenspan at the Fed, according to the Wall Street Journal), and Robert Hall, who heads the official Recession Dating Committee of the National Bureau of Economic Research.

Each new cohort of Schwarzman Scholars will join a global network of the world's most talented young leaders.

At the end of last month, the Brookings Institute hosted a conversation where one of their most distinguished current scholars introduced and interviewed one of their newest.

I hope you realize anything that is quoted «Spoken by Jesus» is questionable at best as in the academic world (Biblical scholars) most of what was written by anonymous scribe 200 - 300 years after the event are consider Pseudepigraphic and if nescessary I can supply historical reference.

@mama k Authorship of John — many if not most NT scholars believe that John nor one of 12 wrote John; @Chad «you seem blissfully unaware of the actual facts

And of course most NT scholars agree that Peter did not author Peter 2.

Should add most that you accept since there are tons of orthodox and catholic and evangelical Christian scholars that you clearly have not read or considered.

As soon as word broke about the death of Billy Graham, the most influential Christian evangelist of the twentieth century, scholars and admirers began asking: «Will there ever be another Billy Graham?»

Gary wrong again, Gary wrong again: I was a guest before this on this blog: Even check out Martin Zender; The World's most outspoken bible scholar facebook; You will find me there; he knows me, and his crew knows of me; Father has others too that have been with me for years that are not in my city through their ministries also that have come up along side of me, but I do not want you to come against them as they have their own trials to overcome, therefore; no names given there, they also know me and my testimony: I am God's workmanship therefore, I was brought up in Christ along side witnesses as His testimony: Gary; this is going to be shocking, but because God does not inform you of a thing, means to me, that He has kept very much from you: Now why would that be?

The most skeptic of scholars do not doubt there was Jesus who was a Jew and a rabble rouser cruxcifed by Pilate.

Although the University has indeed placed several distinguished Christian scholars in endowed chairs, each academic department has a high degree of autonomy in making most hiring decisions.

Most legal scholars, in one form or another, have embraced constitutional litigation as the ideal forum for moral evaluation of public policy.

Authorship of John — many if not most NT scholars believe that John nor one of 12 wrote John; James — most agree not authored by James, and sometime in 2nd century AD; Peter — a mystery — some think that it could have been an early template for the other gospels; Luke — a mystery; Mark — finally it seems like we really might have another original author here — or were he and later Paul just using a very early Peter story?

In the Dark Ages, when Christianity was forbidding scientific inquiry as «heresy», Muslim scholars were amongst the most enlightened in the world, giving great contributions to science, art, trade... It's true that the more extreme facets of it today are mis - guided, but so are the most extreme facets of Christianity (just look, again, at history for that one... Inquisition, anyone?)

One of the most deservedly influential among such scholars, in Europe if not yet in the United States, is Francesco Orlando.

(5) The most urgent ecumenical dialogue between Russia and Rome today must focus on a new generation of Russian Orthodox thinkers: those who, having looked hard at the crisis in Ukraine and their Church leadership's propaganda activities on behalf of the Putin regime, have concluded that Russian Orthodoxy needs a new theory of Church - and - state — and should develop one in vigorous conversation with serious scholars of Catholic social doctrine.

The first Christians were never systematically persecuted by the Romans, and most martyrdom stories - with the exception of a handful such as Perpetua's - were exaggerated and invented, several scholars and historians say.

Yet some of the most substantive theology being written by Baptist scholars today comes from a little - known circle of mostly younger moderates who have shown a surprising interest in quite traditional themes such as the deeper meaning of baptism and the Lord's Supper, the covenantal disciplines of congregational life, and the positive role of creeds and confessions in the life of the church.

The Methodist scholar Cyril Eastwood rightly lamented the distortion of this evangelical imperative: «The common error that the phrase «priesthood of believers» is synonymous with «private judgment» is most unfortunate and is certainly a misrepresentation.

The scholar I have found most associated with the claim in more recent Evangelical literature is Anthony Hoekema, an irenic Reformed scholar to be sure, but one who nevertheless has said that «it has been the almost unanimous conviction of the mainline Protestant churches that these miraculous gifts ceased at the close of the Apostolic Age.»

Ker is best known as a Newman scholar, and so it is not surprising that he sees this theme most clearly through the prism of Newman's genius.

It is between the fall of 1517 and the fall of 1518, in the midst of the great controversy in which Luther soon found himself embroiled, that most scholars now locate a crucial turn in his thinking.

The man who wrote the original work was a promising young scholar in his early thirties at All Soul's College at Oxford; the person who issues the new edition is Rollins Professor of History at Princeton, the most renowned student of Augustine in the world, and one of the most respected historians of the religious history of the later Roman Empire.

Jews were protected by Muslims who controlled most of Spain, and parts of Sicily, serving as Doctors, teachers, scholars, etc..

But if you are a student of Latin, don't forget the most important rule, passed down through generations of Latin scholars: Semper Ubi Sub Ubi.

According to the majority viewpoint for most of the 20th century, Jesus» teaching in John is largely irreconcilable with that found in the synoptics, and perhaps most scholars consider the Synoptic Gospels to be more accurate representations of the teaching of the historical Jesus.

Of course, most NT scholars show good reasons why it's likely that Peter did not author Peter 2.

The New International Version Archaeological Study Bible reports: «Scholars have debated the historicity of these references to camels because most believe that these animals were not widely domesticated until approximately 1200 B.C., long after the time of Abraham.»

As I said above, most NT scholars do not think that Peter authored Peter 2 where that stamp of approval appears, Theo.

most NT scholars do not think that Peter authored Peter 2 where that stamp of approval appears, Theo.

Of course most NT scholars find good reason to think that Peter did not author Peter 2, where Peter allegedly deems Paul's works as divine scripture.

The stamp of approval that appears in Peter 2, where now, most NT scholars agree that it is unlikely that Peter authored Peter 2.

The problem I have with most «Biblical scholars» is that they work starting from a series of assumptions that defy history and fact, let alone logic.

In spite of Crossan's views, and those of a few other fringe scholars like him, the consensus of most historians is that the Gospel accounts give us a clear picture of Jesus Christ.

c) you seem unaware that Paul is one of (if not THE) earliest writer in the NT (and most scholars presume the earliest source is the best source)

b) you seem unaware (despite your recent appeal to internet available scholarship) that most scholars take the opposite stance (namely: not only that Paul's teaching is in chorus with Christ, but as an ardent follower of Christ, his teaching * flows directly out * of what Jesus taught)

Although the book is best regarded more as a presentation of the Supreme Court's religious - freedom work than as a direct study of the questions underlying that work» the work of constitutional scholars, for example, is for the most part only referenced, not engaged» it is, nonetheless, recommended.

Although patronage certainly was not the all - pervasive phenomenon so often assumed by classical and New Testament scholars, and was functionally insignificant for most, it was a prominent component of imperial culture and a means by which the rule of the emperors was conceptualized and sustained.

The first is relatively uncontroversial to most believers except, perhaps, to evangelical philosophers and fundamentalists of various types — namely, that laypeople are in no position to adjudicate disputes among experts in New Testament scholarship because the scholars have an expertise in languages and ancient history that laypeople lack.

Virtually all of the most renowned biblical scholars of our era — the names of G. Ernest Wright and Rudolf Bultmann come to mind — either have not investigated the biblical theology of nature or have «discovered» that the biblical approach to nature is substantially the same as the modern theological approach.