Sentences with phrase «most other attacks»

While their helmets are a great defense against jumps, they're still defenseless against most other attacks.

Not exact matches

«Subconsciously, it evokes negative feelings in others because it precedes a right overarm blow, a primal move most primates use in a physical attack.»

David Kennedy, a former Marine intelligence specialist, explains what he thinks would be the most devastating attack on the country and why it's crucial to keep up with other countries when it comes to our cyber capabilities.

The goal of the report is not to dissuade companies, researchers, or the public from AI, but to highlight the most realistic concerns so people can better prepare and possibly prevent future cyber attacks or other problems related to AI.

Therefore, other emerging markets, instead of China, will be affected most from Soros» shorting and speculative attack on currencies.

You interviewed a lot of women, you interviewed Sheryl and others, and obviously you talked to Brianna Wu around Gamergate, because that was to me the most vicious attacks on women that I've seen at all.

As the new government moves forward with what in most other provinces would be considered a moderate progressive agenda, Canada's conservative outrage industry is gearing up its attacks on the Alberta's new government.

Although most majority attacks are anticipated to be perpetrated by an unknown agent for monetary achieve, there have additionally been examples the place two blockchains assault each other in an obvious takeover try.

Well, I picked my sons up from practice, come back here to this site, and still find some of the most pathetic, name - calling, personal ad - hominem attacks on others I've seen in awhile... It makes me think that I waste time being on here with some of you.

There are so many other views on who / what God is, and all they can do is attack the most logically inconsistent one (that there's an all - knowing, all - powerful, all - loving God that personally cares about every detail of your personal life).

He reserves his most ferocious verbal assaults for «zealots» like Nellie Gray; he attacks Phyllis Schlafly («Why anyone paid any attention to this lady is one of the mysteries of the 80s»); he turns on Carl Anderson, who perhaps more than any other single figure in the Reagan Administration was responsible for the success of Koop's confirmation process, and berates him unmercifully for his opposition to the condom solution for AIDS.

the other curious thing is when theists go after the atheists over our knowledge of scripture, most atheists were once theists so we would have some idea of scripture like you all however with the onslaught of attacks from religious folks in the real world when they discover we're not «one of them» has the same effect as the villian in the comics unwittingly creating the superhero.

Currently european and north american nations are being de-Christinized, not only by attacks from science and the arts, but also by the plantation of immigrants with other faiths, most notably Muslim and Hindu beliefs.

Have they killed those of other religions, of course, and they are often the main target's of the attacks, but most often the victims are innocent muslim bystanders.

Later that day, I thought about the game again and realized I had been hiding most of the time: When the game began, the other players ran to the second floor or across the room to station themselves for attack.

@GodPot: since you don't bother to actually research anything, you just watch libtard news, you don't realize that in most states, whites are a minority behind hispanics and blacks, and that both groups are vicious in their attacks on whites mainly, and then each other.

Seventy - five others were wounded in the attack by armed gunmen Sunday, the officials said, adding that most of the casualties were women and children.

Now I come close to the theme of this article: one writer, and I have found no other, in the early Middle Ages attacked classical theism head - on precisely on its two most vulnerable points — its affirmation of, or failure definitely to reject, unqualified theological determinism, and its commitment to endless posthumous careers for human persons, making them in that respect rivals to God.

People kill for the sake of killing in this world, people chop down trees just for the pleasure of watching them fall, they kill little animals, there are people out there who live to wreak havoc on others, even in the most insignificant wayâ $» whether itâ $ ™ s making someone feel bad or attacking someone where it hurts the most.

it's why Mourinho sulks and attacks others... because on the inside, the managers know he has created nothing, sure won things, most managers have won things, but only the greats have created things.

The Frenchman did finally strengthen the areas of defence and attack that most people thought he needed to but it was all a bit last minute and the former United and England striker Andy Cole feels that Wenger is very stubborn about doing what other people say he needs to and that this trait of our manager is costing Arsenal the chance of becoming champions of England once again.

Far better than most of the other players in attack.

Merson Wright Robson or anyone who has an axe to grind with Arsenal is at it I don't give a shit what they think I support th club and team in general if they play shit we have had more success then most teams Thy seem to Laud spuds but the fukers win nothing they won 2 trophies in 30 yeas but I don't see the media others pulling them up on it like we had when we didn't win anything for 10 years There is definitely an agenda in the media against Arsenal and its sadly spearheaded by ex Arsenal players So I say when they ubfairly attack the club and our existing players they are fair game for retribution from the real fans who lives be the club and will support it through thick and thin.

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

That is what the formation is supposed to do, attack and force the other side to defend most of the time.

Their Sylvia Pankhursts were their great golfers who could not fail to be imitated by other women and to be admired by the men: Mrs. Dorothy Campbell Hurd, a Scots girl, who (circa 1910) won the Scottish, British, Canadian and American championships; Cecil Leitch, the first woman who decided that there was no reason a woman shouldn't attack the ball forcefully like the best men players, and who did so with such a natural dash; the incomparable Joyce Wethered, who succeeded Miss Leitch after World War I as the queen of the British links and is remembered as the most consummate of women stylists; Glenna Collett, the pertinacious girl from Providence, the first great American champion, who won our national title six times between 1922 and 1935, and in more recent years such superb players as Patty Berg and the majestic Babe Didrikson Zaharias who «made» women's professional golf after she had become in 1947 the first American to win the British Ladies Championship.

The point, perhaps, is that nobody at a superclub is ever happy unless they win everything, and they must do so with beautiful attacking football; they're so far ahead of most of the competition that nothing other than perfection seems acceptable.

United will be hard to beat, like any other Mou team but there attack is not the most convincing even with the purchase of Lukaku.

McIlroy is the oddsmakers» 8/1 favorite to capture his first Players, even though he conceded on Sunday that he can not attack the venue as he does at most others by outdistancing his competitors.

He is competing with the pair of Granit Xhaka and Jack Wiltshire for a place in the middle of the park, though he will most likely start if he is fit as his industry, attacking threat and awareness are superior to the other players.

Fortunately Milan focused most of their attacks through Suso on the other end.

Most of Brighton's attacks came from the wings, with Ezequiel Schelotto constantly overlapping Knockaert on the right and Gaetan Bong joining Jose Izquierdo to overload the other wing.

Moreover, scoring 4 goals a season off the counter attack is a great number; last season the player with the most (Huntelaar) had 5 while all of the other top forwards, like Neymar, had 4.

On the other side of the pitch, the Argentinian goalkeeper Sergio Romero had a busy time, trying to stop the most effective attack of the competition.

We lacked inventiveness and most importantly the team looked so out of sync in attack (players running into each other, bad off - the - ball movement, etc.).

Despite being a full - back he is one of our most potent attacking threats and far more competent at crossing the ball than other players that we employ specifically for that purpose.

Song, arguably our most improved player is on 4 yellow cards and we should ensure that he doesn't miss the Chelsea game.The partnership of Gallas and Vermaelen is outstanding, yet one can not expect them to play in every game, and it is in that are we are weak in cover.With regards to the full back situation, perm any two from four, that is Clichy, Gibbs, Eboue, Sagna and even Traore they are attacking wing backs and are always at risk on the quick counter attack by the opposition.Almunia still doesn't impress me and his command of his area is still indecisive and he is still vulnerable to letting goals in, especially to his near post.Wenger being Wenger, I doubt he will buy in January, and it is a pity we didn't go for Given months before he joined City, when he was available for a comparatively cheap price.This new diamond shape or 4 -1-4-1 is working well and we have an abundance of quality to interchange, which bemuses the opposition more often than not.We have every chance this year, and we are also being helped by the fact that the other so called big four sides are showing their vulnerability.A couple of decent signings, not squad players in January, and hopefully we are in the mix.

They are already overstocked when it comes to attacking midfielders with Juan Mata, a footballer who would be undroppable at most other clubs, in and out of the team due to the surplus of options available to his manager.

Monreal looks the most likely to score.Welbeck looks good thee others in attack not doing enough IMO

Part of this problem could be considered to be that the most used central midfield pairing, Lucas Leiva and Charlie Adam, aren't particularly dynamic nor inclined to get on the end of crosses (of which Liverpool have had more, per game, than any other team in the league apart from Wolves — more of which, will be discussed later), so this only leaves a certain number of players who will be able to get into the box in the more rigid 4 -4-2 utilised for most of this season. Inspite of this, however, 58 % of Liverpool's goals have come from inside the 18 yard box, the highest in the league so far this season in terms of percentage of goals scored by each individual team, suggesting that this is the best avenue of attack for Liverpool, so the question has to be: why have Liverpool only managed to score 14 times, the 10th lowest amount of goals in the league?

With other attacking options around him, that figure has dropped back to a more reasonable 3.2 with Juventus, hitting the target with 57 % of those attempts and scoring in the biggest games and most vital moments.

Most teams that operate this formation have one player who is more attacking and the other prefers to hold at the base of the midfield.

There are others, which are more telling, such as our current strike force — the SAS, which is considered to be one of the most lethal attacking partnerships in Europe at present.

Defensive flaws have been shown that will be exposed by the ruthless attacks: City, United, Pool (and as Chelsea did already)-- oh and Real Madrid — but we should be able to put most other teams away playing like this.

Rakatic would walk into attacking midfield positions in most other sides in the world but he is prepared to do his job for the benefit of the team and you see how much the likes of Iniesta, Messi and friends enjoy playing with him.

For whatever reason, despite still being good for roughly a goal every other game and remaining Roma's most efficient forward / striker, he didn't fit into Rudi Garcia's wing - focused attack, and his career has never really been quite the same since then.

The Tangerines have endeared themselves to everyone and on Tuesday will provide Sunderland with one of their most testing home encounters in the whole of 2010 simply because they aren't like other sides, they've never heard of the word fear at inside a stadium which has been nothing short of a fortress for the hosts, and Holloway's men will go their with an attacking intent and a purpose to score goals, plenty of them as well.

I have suffered from anxiety for most of my life, and then in the last four years, started having anxiety attacks and its other debilitating sensations and emotions.

Most women in the world are starving to death, fending off rebels / war / disease, others are living a life of subjugation, some get attacked with acid for refusing to be forced into marriage.

Most moms do what «sbest for their kids.And yes, there are women out there who legitimately can not bf, so formula is a WONDERFUL choice for them.I exclusively bf both of mine, but think it's okay to ff if you don't have enough milk.there are other situations where i think it's selfish.As for drugs during pregnancy and birth, I had to take 3 doses of medication while pregnant so that I could eat.my morning sickness was so bad I couldn't even keep water down.I made the choice to do that so I didn't starve my unborn child, but I only took what was neccessary to keep something down, and then had no other drugs and plan not to until my son is done bf.And as for the «natural» baby, carcinogens are EVERYWHERE, even in your organic food.in this industrialized world you can not get away from them, and to attack other moms for their choices is a sad statement of your morality and on how your child's persoality is going to turn out.also, having multiple kids is definately more demanding than one.