Not exact matches
A new study by scientists from WCS (Wildlife Conservation Society) and
other groups predicts that the effects of
climate change will severely
impact the Albertine Rift, one of Africa's
most biodiverse regions and a place not normally associated with global warming.
Comparing the snakes»
most active temperature range with predictions of shifts due to
climate change, the team pointed out that the timing of seasonal activities may shift in the future — which could
impact their interactions with
other species.
This lake is the Great Lake
most impacted by summer hypoxia — the loss of oxygen at the bottom that affects fish and
other living communities — and, according to Dr. Twiss, is a good sentinel for
climate change.
What we know from reading the actual findings of this study, as well as several
other analyses of the
climate impacts of fossil fuel subsidy removal, is that nixing oil, gas, and coal subsidies would be a big win for the
climate, would saves money, and could free up resources to help the poorest and
most vulnerable.
Droughts, violent storms, sea - level rise and
other climate changes are already
impacting the poorest and
most vulnerable countries and communities.
In examining the
impact of the school's civic
climate, it is again important to take into account
other factors, focusing this time on those
most likely to influence the respondent's decision to vote.
The
most indirect
impact of all is coming through the global buildup of carbon dioxide and
other greenhouse gases, which are altering the
climate and ocean chemistry with long - lasting repercussions.
We judge that the
most significant
impact for the United States will be indirect and result from
climate - driven effects on many
other countries and their potential to seriously affect US national security interests.
Conscious that while our nations lie at the
climate frontline and will disproportionately feel the
impacts of global warming, in the end
climate change will threaten the sustainable development and, ultimately, the survival of all states and peoples — the fate of the
most vulnerable will be the fate of the world; and convinced that our acute vulnerability not only allows us to perceive the threat of
climate change more clearly than
others, but also provides us with the clarity of vision to understand the steps that must be taken to protect the Earth's
climate system and the determination to see the job done;
Now the deployment of fossil and coal generation in regions like sub-Saharan Africa is very likely a net positive for humanity, since a lack of modern electricity systems is largely what makes those locales
most vulnerable to
climate and
other impacts in the first place.
Edward Lendner, who was director of
climate issues in a previous White House administration, wrote last week: «In what would be the single
most important contingency that could
impact civil society in the United States and
other nations around the world, there is no agreed upon plan for how to deal with a collapsing world in the distant future if
climate change and global warming get out of control and mass migrations northward create chaos in both wealthy and poor countries.»
Desirous of building upon the commitment of leaders at the recent United Nations High - Level Summit on
Climate Change in New York in addressing the needs of those countries most vulnerable to the impacts of climate change as well as other political commitments, including the AOSIS Declaration and the African Common Po
Climate Change in New York in addressing the needs of those countries
most vulnerable to the
impacts of
climate change as well as other political commitments, including the AOSIS Declaration and the African Common Po
climate change as well as
other political commitments, including the AOSIS Declaration and the African Common Position,
The
other features — already mentioned — were the identification of dominant regional concerns, the highlighting of
climate change
impacts already occurring, and the report's effectiveness as an engagement tool, which Mooney had just commented on, plus one more thing: the focus on extreme events, which are both
most noticeable by the public and the primary source of economic damage in the next several decades, as Dr. Michael Hanemann (author of this paper) explained to me for a story I wrote about the California drought.
The biggest and
most obvious cost was to human health: premature death — from heat stress or
other climate - related
impacts — would account for $ 120 billion; coastal losses would claim $ 42 billion and agriculture $ 18bn.
Policy implications are not limited by the uncertainties of
climate science itself, they are more limited for
other reasons: uncertainties in actual
impacts and
most importantly uncertainties in the actual outcomes of any specific policy decision.
With every assessment the group publishes four technical reports, each thousands of pages long — one on the basic science, and
others on
climate impacts and how to adapt to them, ways to curb emissions, and a synthesis of all the findings — as well as a 20 - page summary for policymakers that covers the material
most relevant to world leaders and the public.
Although one might think that the human health
impacts of global warming would be among the
most well studied areas of
climate change, it is only in the last decade that the medical community and
other health professionals have focused on this issue in depth.
It's no coincidence that obesity is
most prevalent in the US, where per capita carbon emissions exceed those of any
other major nation, and it is becoming clear that obese people are having a direct
impact on the
climate.
In order to avoid the
most devastating
impacts of global warming,
climate scientists have warned that emissions of carbon dioxide and
other greenhouse gases need to be cut in order to keep the increase in average global temperature to less than 3.6 degrees Fahrenheit (2 degrees Celsius).
tonyb, Black carbon, regular ash and wind erosion along with
other hydro - logical changes from decimating beavers to draining wet lands to fight malaria likely have and will continue to have large
impacts on
climate, but who is to say that
most of that hasn't been a good thing in terms of mankind?
On what specific basis do you disregard the conclusions of the United States Academy of Sciences, and numerous
other Academies of Sciences around the World including the Royal Academy of the UK, over a hundred of the
most prestigious scientific organizations whose membership includes those with expertise relevant to the science of
climate change, including the American Association for the Advancement of Science, the American Geophysical Union, the American Institute of Physics, the American Meteorological Society, the Royal Meteorological Society, and according to the American Academy of Sciences, 97 percent of scientists who actually do peer - reviewed research on
climate change whose conclusions hold that the Earth is warming, that the warming is mostly human caused, that harsh
impacts from warming are already being experienced in parts of the world, and that the international community is running out of time to prevent catastrophic warming.
As women and men are affected differently by the
impacts of
climate change, with women likely to bear the greater burden in situations of poverty,
climate actions have to be gender sensitive... MR: Those people in the
most vulnerable situations typically live beyond the reach of conventional markets, and so require their needs to be met through
other channels that can provide sustained social gains in the long term.
On what specific basis do you disregard the conclusions of the United States Academy of Sciences, and numerous
other Academies of Sciences Around the World including the Royal Academy of the UK, over a hundred of the
most prestigious scientific organizations whose membership includes those with expertise relevant to the science of
climate change, including the American Association for the Advancement of Science, the American Geophysical Union, the American Institute of Physics, the American Meteorological Society, the Royal Meteorological Society, and according to the American Academy of Sciences 97 percent of scientists who actually do peer - reviewed research on
climate change which conclusions hold that the Earth is warming, that the warming is mostly human caused, and that harsh
impacts from warming are already being experienced in parts of the world, and that the international community is running out of time to prevent catastrophic warming.
These questions are organized according to the
most frequent arguments made against
climate change policies which are claims that
climate change policies: (a) will impose unacceptable costs on a national economy or specific industries or prevent nations from pursuing
other national priorities, (b) should not be adopted because of scientific uncertainty about
climate change
impacts, or (c) are both unfair and ineffective as long as high emitting nations such as China or India do not adopt meaningful ghg emissions reduction policies.
Other honourable mentions in the Carbon Brief survey of
most influential
climate papers go to Norman Phillips, whose 1956 paper described the first general circulation model, William Nordhaus's 1991 paperon the economics of the greenhouse effect, and a paper by Camile Parmesan and Gary Yohe in 2003, considered by many to provide the first formal attribution of
climate change
impacts on animal and plant species.
The UNFCCC Compendium on methods and tools to evaluate
impacts of, and vulnerability and adaptation to,
climate change is designed to assist Parties and
other potential users in selecting the
most appropriate methodology for assessments of
impacts and vulnerability, and preparing for adaptation to
climate change.
To many
others, Cancun was another tragic lost opportunity for the international community to prevent dangerous
climate change, as well as, the
most recent in a series of moral failures of those
most responsible for
climate change to commit to steps necessary to protect those who are
most vulnerable to
climate change's harshest
impacts.
So are
most of the
other symptoms of
climate change, such as Arctic sea ice retreat, in terms of their
impact.
Perhaps because the image we associate
most often with a changing
climate is not the devastation left by a flood in our own state but rather a polar bear perched on a chunk of melting ice or an African farmer bearing silent witness to the
impacts of a disaster that's taken place on the
other side of the world.
The
most likely candidate for that climatic variable force that comes to mind is solar variability (because I can think of no
other force that can change or reverse in a different trend often enough, and quick enough to account for the historical climatic record) and the primary and secondary effects associated with this solar variability which I feel are a significant player in glacial / inter-glacial cycles, counter climatic trends when taken into consideration with these factors which are, land / ocean arrangements, mean land elevation, mean magnetic field strength of the earth (magnetic excursions), the mean state of the
climate (average global temperature), the initial state of the earth's
climate (how close to interglacial - glacial threshold condition it is) the state of random terrestrial (violent volcanic eruption, or a random atmospheric circulation / oceanic pattern that feeds upon itself possibly) / extra terrestrial events (super-nova in vicinity of earth or a random
impact) along with Milankovitch Cycles.
But their efforts are hindered as
climate practitioners struggle to stay on top of the latest research, evaluate which public engagement tools are
most effective or coordinate with
others to increase
impact.
It is intellectually dishonest to devote several pages to cherry - picking studies that disagree with the IPCC consensus on net health effects because you don't like its scientific conclusion, while then devoting several pages to hiding behind [a misstatement of] the U.N. consensus on sea level rise because you know a lot reasonable people think the U.N. wildly underestimated the upper end of the range and you want to attack Al Gore for worrying about 20 - foot sea level rise.On this blog, I have tried to be clear what I believe with my earlier three - part series: Since sea level, arctic ice, and
most other climate change indicators have been changing faster than
most IPCC models projected and since the IPCC neglects key amplifying carbon cycle feedbacks, the IPCC reports almost certainly underestimate future
climate impacts.
Other data sets such as ocean heat content, sea ice extent, whatever, are not sufficiently mature or long - range... Further, the surface temperature is
most relevant to
climate change
impacts, since humans and land ecosystems live on the surface.»
If the case for researching any form of technology is justified according to its potential for reducing harms associated with
impacts of
climate change, then it naturally invites questions about what kinds of harms are
most important to avoid and the technology's benefits and disadvantages compared to
other potential responses to
climate change.
However, for the
most part it is very difficult to separate out the
impacts of human caused
climate change from natural
climate change and from
other societal
impacts.
BARRY BROOK: Looking hard at renewable energy, there are a lot of limitations, especially in terms of energy storage and energy back up that make it extraordinarily implausible, according to my view and that of many
others, that it could supply
most of our power needs in the future, which, for someone who's really concerned about
climate change
impacts is a pretty disappointing conclusion.