It comes complete with a 31 Teaching Activity Teacher Guide to help you get
the most out of your teaching and this purchase.
Just for good measure, I have included for free all my guided reading worksheets to help you get
the most out of this teaching pack (You save 72 % compared to buying these resources individually!)
They will also get an intensive training programme to help them get
the most out of the teaching material, focused on the trust's curriculum centre at the Hewett Academy in Norwich.
Not exact matches
This one from McMaster University via Coursera is focused more on career issues, and the topics covered sound like a top hits list
of common work questions: «Mindshift
teaches you essentials such as how to get the
most out of online learning and MOOCs, how to seek
out and work with mentors, the secrets to avoiding career ruts (and catastrophes) and general ruts in life, and insights such as the value
of selective ignorance over general competence.»
In one
of the film's
most telling scenes, Reine, who during the filming was eking
out a living
teaching gymnastics to children, signs up for a Toastmasters course.
Our preliminary data already show the importance
of certain beliefs for success in physics courses and a student's inclination to continue in or drop
out of physics, and it shows that
most teaching practices have a detrimental impact on all
of these critical beliefs.
We
teach you Search engine optimization strategies so you get the
most out of your website.
She
teaches me everyday to not sweat the small stuff and
out of the three
of us, the
most easy - going.
if there's one thing i love
most about your
teaching, it is the fact about throwing
out the junk
of indicactors....
But no harm is done by
teaching kids that some people used to think there was a tooth fairy but
most of them eventually figured
out that it was really their parents.
b) you seem unaware (despite your recent appeal to internet available scholarship) that
most scholars take the opposite stance (namely: not only that Paul's
teaching is in chorus with Christ, but as an ardent follower
of Christ, his
teaching * flows directly
out *
of what Jesus
taught)
heres a holiday that has maintained its meaning thru -
out the ages, why... the JEWISH have reverence for the past, its lessons and people that
taught them, the events that shaped the jewish culture...
most of the rest have nothing worth remembering besides there past and since thats not held with any amount
of importance the future looks bleek at best... we are what we are because
of yesterday, and tomorrow doesn't exist if today becomes our deathbed!
CNN: American nuns come
out swinging against Vatican in face
of «radical feminist» accusations The leadership representing
most of America's nuns came
out swinging Friday against the leaders
of the Roman Catholic Church, in the face
of charges from the Vatican that the nuns are espousing «radical feminism» and straying from church
teaching.
I'm not interested in using this space to sidetrack the discussion into this arena but simply noting that this
teaching is seen as an
out of sync with even the
most liberal
teachings on the topic.
Note that if I changed my theology to reflect your opinion, I might actually increase my blog followers, since
most of the popular blogs
out there
teach what I understand you as saying.
With public schools fast becoming incubators
of gender ideology, parents need to cast off their fears
of entering the fray, speak
out, and,
most importantly,
teach their children that their sex is a beautiful, biological reality.
That sounds like a tall order but, hey, if recent events have
taught us anything, it's that there are a lot more Nazi sympathizers
out there than
most of us thought.
This is why I laugh when people like Calvin and others actually have the nerve to
teach an iron clad doctrine
out of the
most deliberately vague chapters in all
of the NT.
This is one
of the
most powerful prayers
out there... I was being
taught this prayer before I could ever talk.
Arden said she was
taught by a supervisor at the church's nursery how to opt
out of a Texas law that requires
most children to be immunized.
As we pointed
out in chapter I, above, it is here that the modern attempt to reconstruct his
teaching has been
most successful and, today, the best - known feature
of that
teaching is its incomparable use
of simile and analogy.
It reminds us that our
most pressing constitutional questions (on slavery and secession) were settled
out of court; that it took more than a wiser judge to reverse our
most villainous chief justice (Roger Taney); and that our Constitution's
most consequential interpreter wasn't a robed philosopher - king but a self -
taught lawyer from Kentucky by way
of Illinois.
Think you are wisely right to have your concerns but let me Guide you to ask which branches
of Islam handles each mosque you know
of and find
out more about their mentality and they call for since not all branches
of Islam are
of danger, but you mentioned some thing which make me feel that there is a possibility that you got the
most redial branch
of all Islam branches... This branch is taking advantage
of the presence
of non harming Muslims to expand it's redical
teachings by offerings or force turning Islamic communities from normal to
most redical
of all... do not favor to give the name
of that branch but sure you will find it if you look for it...
As Robert Iosue, president at York College, has pointed
out most persuasively, faculty members aren't very productive» assuming, that is, that productivity is related to the number
of teaching hours in a week.
In this way it was that they were
taught that
most cruel
of sacrifices, a custom they always practiced after that, which consisted
of cutting open a man s chest in order to tear
out his heart and offer it to their idols.11
And though I didn't manage more than a pitiful fraction
of what he had to
teach, that offbeat educational
outing did convey a lifelong lesson: There are times when the simplest
of ideas are best explained — indeed,
most effectively explained — by the
most extraordinary
of minds.
I thought the same thing Adam used her as bait An why don't
most churches
teach that Adam was standing right next to her he could
of slap the fruit
out of her hand killed the snake called God
One
of the phenomena
most difficult for the Catholic Church to understand, as Gilfeather O'Brien points
out, is how the Guatemalan cofradias (religious fratemities based on the syncretism
of Roman Catholic and ancient Mayan
teachings) have been unable to compete with Pentecostal groups that offer «personal transformation
of the kind the Catholic Church has desired but never achieved over the centuries.»
well just thinking about these wars in the muslim / mid-east world over religious differences (which may reflect mental states in many ways) in a world where
most realize that living in the present moment is best way to happiness and being in the moment in non-strife and awareness through the
teachings of masters such as found in the buddhist, taoist, zen, etc., etc., etc. spriritually based practices
of religious like thought and
teachings, etc. that to ask these scientifically educated populace whom have access to vast amounts
of knowledges and understandings on the internet, etc. to believe in past beliefs that perhaps gave basis and inspiration to that which followed — but is not the end all
of all times or knowledges — and is thus — non self - sustaining in a belief that does not encompass growth
of knowledge and understanding
of all truths and being as it is or could be — is to not respect the intelligence and minds and personage
of even themselves — not to be disrespected nor disrespectful in any way — only to point
out that perhaps too much is asked to put others into the cloak
of blind faith and adherance to the past that disregards the realities
of the present and the potential
of the future... so you try to live in the past — and destroy your present and your future — where is the intelligence in that — and why do people continually fear monger or allow to be fear — mongered into this destructive vision
of the future based upon the past?
At a time when sermons at Mass were unusual —
most teaching was done by way
of comments when giving
out the notices, or separate evening meetings, or through the innumerable and thriving Catholic organisations around the parish — this was a topic that could get neglected.
When we think
of him that way, in our
most honest moments, we think that while it would have been nice to be back there and hear some
of His
teaching, see some
of His parables, and go ask him that theological question that's always been bothering us — if we're honest with ourselves, we're not sure he's really the kind
of guy we would want to hang
out with.
Ballard published his earliest revelations from St. Germain in Unveiled Mysteries, a
most unusual account
of his adventures
out of the body, in both space and time, in the course
of which the basic
teachings of the cult appear.
Ahem, you do realize that the «cult» you call the Catholic Church is the original Christian Church and that
MOST of the
teachings you follow came
out of that cult?
When you peel the layers off their conscious mind and reach the subconscious, you will find
most times that they mean they don't like the
teaching this institution gives about poverty, prayer, attendance at the Eucharist, and their sexual life, whether in or
out of marriage.
What worries me
most, is that what we've been
taught as right, will actually turn
out to be wrong, and what we always thought
of as wrong, will turn
out to be right.
As to those who disbelieve or mock religion, I read something recently that I'd like to share — not
out of a spirit
of contention and argument, but in one
of genuine concern and interest for those who have not been
taught by their own mothers or fathers (as I have
most thoroughly been blessed):
One
of the
most pressing intellectual responsibilities
of the Negro student and minister today is that
of working
out some
of the ethical and theological clues that the Negro revolution is
teaching him and us all.)
As I point
out in The Crescent Directive, for
most people, their perceptions
of a particular group are more
of a function
of their observations and interactions with individual members
of that group, than they are a function
of specific
teachings of that faith.
What if Christians are right about Christ and his
teachings and that HE is the way to Heaven then they will be in Heaven one day and those who do not follow Christ will be in Hell... However, if they are wrong at least they don't lose
out as they have tried to live their lives according to principles that
most of us would say are commendable and so they WIN either way....
(CNN)-- The leadership representing
most of America's nuns came
out swinging Friday against the leaders
of the Roman Catholic Church, in the face
of charges from the Vatican that the nuns are espousing «radical feminism» and straying from church
teaching.
Their enthusiastic support
of expensive, lie - based, unnecessary massive violence (e.g., the War in Iraq) directly contradicts the
teachings of Jesus, as the Vatican and
most Protestant religious hierarchies have repeatedly pointed
out.
I don't think it's so much about the levites being paid for their service it's about us doing what's right toward Pastors that must feed and tend to the flock
of GOD if GOD has called them.JESUS even said in luke 10:7 that the laborers are worthy of their wages.In luke 8 1 - 4 it's says even JESUS HIMSELF recieved financial support from the women who ministered to him with their possessions.Now most people today would say he should have been ashamed of taking money from those poor women but JESUS accepted their support and they was blessed for sowing onto the LORD»S work.1 Corinthains 9:1 - 15 says dint muzzle the ox while it tread out the grain was GOD talking about oxes no he was talking about those who labor in the ministry.Who goes to war at their own expense.Or who goes to war but pay for their clothes, guns, etc.No one because the goverment if that country provide these things because of the soilders service.Who plants a vineyard and don't eat from it.Who tends a flock and don't drink the milk of it.I think it's just spiritual sense to support a pastor that's teaching you the word, casting out devils, laying hands and healing is manifesting in people lived, going to hospitails, prisons, and house calls to pray for the sick and shut in, going to graduations and funnerals, praying and fasting for himself and the flock.I think a person who think a pastor shouldn't be paid for their service either don't know they need to be paid and need to be taught or they are demonic in their thinking and either hate GOD, PASTORS, AND GOD»S PEOPLE.Why do nt you hear people saying anything against the dope dealers, strip clubs, dope houses, liquor stores, etc.It's only when people give into the LORD»S work that evil minded or misinformed people have a problem with it.No sir we don't have to use the old testament to show that we should support out pastors.You don't use the law, love tells me to support the pastor.Under the new testament LOVE is the greatest of all.Love for GOD and man.If GOD asked for 10 percent under the law to support the levites who didn't have all the responsibilities of Pastor today.Church rent, gas for vans of thd church, insurance fir the church and church vehicles, feeding and clothing the poor, light, gas, and water bill, mantience on the church or vehicles, not to mention the Pastor own house, cars, children, insurance, etc.If would be foolish for one to think that a pastor should take care if his house and GODS HOUSE without people supporting the work of the KINGDOM OF GOD.If we love GOD we are going to support HIS KINGDOM and HIS PASTOR.If under the law GOD asked for 10 percent how much should we give under the LOVE COVENANT?Example I love my wife and if I had 300 dollars I would surley give her more that 10 percent which would be 30 dollars because I love her.The law says you must give LOVE says I chose to give because I love GOD and man.Again we don't have to use the law just love and spiritual sense because hate and a carnal senses will not understand.Now I have given you scriptures please do the same when you respond not your opinion.Please respond right away I await your answer.GOD BLES
of GOD if GOD has called them.JESUS even said in luke 10:7 that the laborers are worthy
of their wages.In luke 8 1 - 4 it's says even JESUS HIMSELF recieved financial support from the women who ministered to him with their possessions.Now most people today would say he should have been ashamed of taking money from those poor women but JESUS accepted their support and they was blessed for sowing onto the LORD»S work.1 Corinthains 9:1 - 15 says dint muzzle the ox while it tread out the grain was GOD talking about oxes no he was talking about those who labor in the ministry.Who goes to war at their own expense.Or who goes to war but pay for their clothes, guns, etc.No one because the goverment if that country provide these things because of the soilders service.Who plants a vineyard and don't eat from it.Who tends a flock and don't drink the milk of it.I think it's just spiritual sense to support a pastor that's teaching you the word, casting out devils, laying hands and healing is manifesting in people lived, going to hospitails, prisons, and house calls to pray for the sick and shut in, going to graduations and funnerals, praying and fasting for himself and the flock.I think a person who think a pastor shouldn't be paid for their service either don't know they need to be paid and need to be taught or they are demonic in their thinking and either hate GOD, PASTORS, AND GOD»S PEOPLE.Why do nt you hear people saying anything against the dope dealers, strip clubs, dope houses, liquor stores, etc.It's only when people give into the LORD»S work that evil minded or misinformed people have a problem with it.No sir we don't have to use the old testament to show that we should support out pastors.You don't use the law, love tells me to support the pastor.Under the new testament LOVE is the greatest of all.Love for GOD and man.If GOD asked for 10 percent under the law to support the levites who didn't have all the responsibilities of Pastor today.Church rent, gas for vans of thd church, insurance fir the church and church vehicles, feeding and clothing the poor, light, gas, and water bill, mantience on the church or vehicles, not to mention the Pastor own house, cars, children, insurance, etc.If would be foolish for one to think that a pastor should take care if his house and GODS HOUSE without people supporting the work of the KINGDOM OF GOD.If we love GOD we are going to support HIS KINGDOM and HIS PASTOR.If under the law GOD asked for 10 percent how much should we give under the LOVE COVENANT?Example I love my wife and if I had 300 dollars I would surley give her more that 10 percent which would be 30 dollars because I love her.The law says you must give LOVE says I chose to give because I love GOD and man.Again we don't have to use the law just love and spiritual sense because hate and a carnal senses will not understand.Now I have given you scriptures please do the same when you respond not your opinion.Please respond right away I await your answer.GOD BLES
of their wages.In luke 8 1 - 4 it's says even JESUS HIMSELF recieved financial support from the women who ministered to him with their possessions.Now
most people today would say he should have been ashamed
of taking money from those poor women but JESUS accepted their support and they was blessed for sowing onto the LORD»S work.1 Corinthains 9:1 - 15 says dint muzzle the ox while it tread out the grain was GOD talking about oxes no he was talking about those who labor in the ministry.Who goes to war at their own expense.Or who goes to war but pay for their clothes, guns, etc.No one because the goverment if that country provide these things because of the soilders service.Who plants a vineyard and don't eat from it.Who tends a flock and don't drink the milk of it.I think it's just spiritual sense to support a pastor that's teaching you the word, casting out devils, laying hands and healing is manifesting in people lived, going to hospitails, prisons, and house calls to pray for the sick and shut in, going to graduations and funnerals, praying and fasting for himself and the flock.I think a person who think a pastor shouldn't be paid for their service either don't know they need to be paid and need to be taught or they are demonic in their thinking and either hate GOD, PASTORS, AND GOD»S PEOPLE.Why do nt you hear people saying anything against the dope dealers, strip clubs, dope houses, liquor stores, etc.It's only when people give into the LORD»S work that evil minded or misinformed people have a problem with it.No sir we don't have to use the old testament to show that we should support out pastors.You don't use the law, love tells me to support the pastor.Under the new testament LOVE is the greatest of all.Love for GOD and man.If GOD asked for 10 percent under the law to support the levites who didn't have all the responsibilities of Pastor today.Church rent, gas for vans of thd church, insurance fir the church and church vehicles, feeding and clothing the poor, light, gas, and water bill, mantience on the church or vehicles, not to mention the Pastor own house, cars, children, insurance, etc.If would be foolish for one to think that a pastor should take care if his house and GODS HOUSE without people supporting the work of the KINGDOM OF GOD.If we love GOD we are going to support HIS KINGDOM and HIS PASTOR.If under the law GOD asked for 10 percent how much should we give under the LOVE COVENANT?Example I love my wife and if I had 300 dollars I would surley give her more that 10 percent which would be 30 dollars because I love her.The law says you must give LOVE says I chose to give because I love GOD and man.Again we don't have to use the law just love and spiritual sense because hate and a carnal senses will not understand.Now I have given you scriptures please do the same when you respond not your opinion.Please respond right away I await your answer.GOD BLES
of taking money from those poor women but JESUS accepted their support and they was blessed for sowing onto the LORD»S work.1 Corinthains 9:1 - 15 says dint muzzle the ox while it tread
out the grain was GOD talking about oxes no he was talking about those who labor in the ministry.Who goes to war at their own expense.Or who goes to war but pay for their clothes, guns, etc.No one because the goverment if that country provide these things because
of the soilders service.Who plants a vineyard and don't eat from it.Who tends a flock and don't drink the milk of it.I think it's just spiritual sense to support a pastor that's teaching you the word, casting out devils, laying hands and healing is manifesting in people lived, going to hospitails, prisons, and house calls to pray for the sick and shut in, going to graduations and funnerals, praying and fasting for himself and the flock.I think a person who think a pastor shouldn't be paid for their service either don't know they need to be paid and need to be taught or they are demonic in their thinking and either hate GOD, PASTORS, AND GOD»S PEOPLE.Why do nt you hear people saying anything against the dope dealers, strip clubs, dope houses, liquor stores, etc.It's only when people give into the LORD»S work that evil minded or misinformed people have a problem with it.No sir we don't have to use the old testament to show that we should support out pastors.You don't use the law, love tells me to support the pastor.Under the new testament LOVE is the greatest of all.Love for GOD and man.If GOD asked for 10 percent under the law to support the levites who didn't have all the responsibilities of Pastor today.Church rent, gas for vans of thd church, insurance fir the church and church vehicles, feeding and clothing the poor, light, gas, and water bill, mantience on the church or vehicles, not to mention the Pastor own house, cars, children, insurance, etc.If would be foolish for one to think that a pastor should take care if his house and GODS HOUSE without people supporting the work of the KINGDOM OF GOD.If we love GOD we are going to support HIS KINGDOM and HIS PASTOR.If under the law GOD asked for 10 percent how much should we give under the LOVE COVENANT?Example I love my wife and if I had 300 dollars I would surley give her more that 10 percent which would be 30 dollars because I love her.The law says you must give LOVE says I chose to give because I love GOD and man.Again we don't have to use the law just love and spiritual sense because hate and a carnal senses will not understand.Now I have given you scriptures please do the same when you respond not your opinion.Please respond right away I await your answer.GOD BLES
of the soilders service.Who plants a vineyard and don't eat from it.Who tends a flock and don't drink the milk
of it.I think it's just spiritual sense to support a pastor that's teaching you the word, casting out devils, laying hands and healing is manifesting in people lived, going to hospitails, prisons, and house calls to pray for the sick and shut in, going to graduations and funnerals, praying and fasting for himself and the flock.I think a person who think a pastor shouldn't be paid for their service either don't know they need to be paid and need to be taught or they are demonic in their thinking and either hate GOD, PASTORS, AND GOD»S PEOPLE.Why do nt you hear people saying anything against the dope dealers, strip clubs, dope houses, liquor stores, etc.It's only when people give into the LORD»S work that evil minded or misinformed people have a problem with it.No sir we don't have to use the old testament to show that we should support out pastors.You don't use the law, love tells me to support the pastor.Under the new testament LOVE is the greatest of all.Love for GOD and man.If GOD asked for 10 percent under the law to support the levites who didn't have all the responsibilities of Pastor today.Church rent, gas for vans of thd church, insurance fir the church and church vehicles, feeding and clothing the poor, light, gas, and water bill, mantience on the church or vehicles, not to mention the Pastor own house, cars, children, insurance, etc.If would be foolish for one to think that a pastor should take care if his house and GODS HOUSE without people supporting the work of the KINGDOM OF GOD.If we love GOD we are going to support HIS KINGDOM and HIS PASTOR.If under the law GOD asked for 10 percent how much should we give under the LOVE COVENANT?Example I love my wife and if I had 300 dollars I would surley give her more that 10 percent which would be 30 dollars because I love her.The law says you must give LOVE says I chose to give because I love GOD and man.Again we don't have to use the law just love and spiritual sense because hate and a carnal senses will not understand.Now I have given you scriptures please do the same when you respond not your opinion.Please respond right away I await your answer.GOD BLES
of it.I think it's just spiritual sense to support a pastor that's
teaching you the word, casting
out devils, laying hands and healing is manifesting in people lived, going to hospitails, prisons, and house calls to pray for the sick and shut in, going to graduations and funnerals, praying and fasting for himself and the flock.I think a person who think a pastor shouldn't be paid for their service either don't know they need to be paid and need to be
taught or they are demonic in their thinking and either hate GOD, PASTORS, AND GOD»S PEOPLE.Why do nt you hear people saying anything against the dope dealers, strip clubs, dope houses, liquor stores, etc.It's only when people give into the LORD»S work that evil minded or misinformed people have a problem with it.No sir we don't have to use the old testament to show that we should support
out pastors.You don't use the law, love tells me to support the pastor.Under the new testament LOVE is the greatest
of all.Love for GOD and man.If GOD asked for 10 percent under the law to support the levites who didn't have all the responsibilities of Pastor today.Church rent, gas for vans of thd church, insurance fir the church and church vehicles, feeding and clothing the poor, light, gas, and water bill, mantience on the church or vehicles, not to mention the Pastor own house, cars, children, insurance, etc.If would be foolish for one to think that a pastor should take care if his house and GODS HOUSE without people supporting the work of the KINGDOM OF GOD.If we love GOD we are going to support HIS KINGDOM and HIS PASTOR.If under the law GOD asked for 10 percent how much should we give under the LOVE COVENANT?Example I love my wife and if I had 300 dollars I would surley give her more that 10 percent which would be 30 dollars because I love her.The law says you must give LOVE says I chose to give because I love GOD and man.Again we don't have to use the law just love and spiritual sense because hate and a carnal senses will not understand.Now I have given you scriptures please do the same when you respond not your opinion.Please respond right away I await your answer.GOD BLES
of all.Love for GOD and man.If GOD asked for 10 percent under the law to support the levites who didn't have all the responsibilities
of Pastor today.Church rent, gas for vans of thd church, insurance fir the church and church vehicles, feeding and clothing the poor, light, gas, and water bill, mantience on the church or vehicles, not to mention the Pastor own house, cars, children, insurance, etc.If would be foolish for one to think that a pastor should take care if his house and GODS HOUSE without people supporting the work of the KINGDOM OF GOD.If we love GOD we are going to support HIS KINGDOM and HIS PASTOR.If under the law GOD asked for 10 percent how much should we give under the LOVE COVENANT?Example I love my wife and if I had 300 dollars I would surley give her more that 10 percent which would be 30 dollars because I love her.The law says you must give LOVE says I chose to give because I love GOD and man.Again we don't have to use the law just love and spiritual sense because hate and a carnal senses will not understand.Now I have given you scriptures please do the same when you respond not your opinion.Please respond right away I await your answer.GOD BLES
of Pastor today.Church rent, gas for vans
of thd church, insurance fir the church and church vehicles, feeding and clothing the poor, light, gas, and water bill, mantience on the church or vehicles, not to mention the Pastor own house, cars, children, insurance, etc.If would be foolish for one to think that a pastor should take care if his house and GODS HOUSE without people supporting the work of the KINGDOM OF GOD.If we love GOD we are going to support HIS KINGDOM and HIS PASTOR.If under the law GOD asked for 10 percent how much should we give under the LOVE COVENANT?Example I love my wife and if I had 300 dollars I would surley give her more that 10 percent which would be 30 dollars because I love her.The law says you must give LOVE says I chose to give because I love GOD and man.Again we don't have to use the law just love and spiritual sense because hate and a carnal senses will not understand.Now I have given you scriptures please do the same when you respond not your opinion.Please respond right away I await your answer.GOD BLES
of thd church, insurance fir the church and church vehicles, feeding and clothing the poor, light, gas, and water bill, mantience on the church or vehicles, not to mention the Pastor own house, cars, children, insurance, etc.If would be foolish for one to think that a pastor should take care if his house and GODS HOUSE without people supporting the work
of the KINGDOM OF GOD.If we love GOD we are going to support HIS KINGDOM and HIS PASTOR.If under the law GOD asked for 10 percent how much should we give under the LOVE COVENANT?Example I love my wife and if I had 300 dollars I would surley give her more that 10 percent which would be 30 dollars because I love her.The law says you must give LOVE says I chose to give because I love GOD and man.Again we don't have to use the law just love and spiritual sense because hate and a carnal senses will not understand.Now I have given you scriptures please do the same when you respond not your opinion.Please respond right away I await your answer.GOD BLES
of the KINGDOM
OF GOD.If we love GOD we are going to support HIS KINGDOM and HIS PASTOR.If under the law GOD asked for 10 percent how much should we give under the LOVE COVENANT?Example I love my wife and if I had 300 dollars I would surley give her more that 10 percent which would be 30 dollars because I love her.The law says you must give LOVE says I chose to give because I love GOD and man.Again we don't have to use the law just love and spiritual sense because hate and a carnal senses will not understand.Now I have given you scriptures please do the same when you respond not your opinion.Please respond right away I await your answer.GOD BLES
OF GOD.If we love GOD we are going to support HIS KINGDOM and HIS PASTOR.If under the law GOD asked for 10 percent how much should we give under the LOVE COVENANT?Example I love my wife and if I had 300 dollars I would surley give her more that 10 percent which would be 30 dollars because I love her.The law says you must give LOVE says I chose to give because I love GOD and man.Again we don't have to use the law just love and spiritual sense because hate and a carnal senses will not understand.Now I have given you scriptures please do the same when you respond not your opinion.Please respond right away I await your answer.GOD BLESS.
I actually didn't make a «list»
of goals for this year because If there is anything the year 2014
taught me it's that things happen, and plans go
out the window, and
most likely we won't be prepared for things to come.
I wake up at 5AM
most mornings and book it
out of the apartment to
teach so I'm LOVING breakfasts I can prepare the night before and grab the next day.
I have discovered, after years
of teaching others how to make pastry, that the
most common problem, by a mile, is making small pieces
out of your butter and / or not keeping ingredients cold.
Plue actually loves when people make mistakes in her kitchen; turns
out, those are some
of the
most productive
teaching moments.
This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety
of reasons,
most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style
of play has become a shadow
of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play
out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid
of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly
out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs
out wide, we've seen pace from the likes
of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play
of Monreal, but none
of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio
of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't
teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part
of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part
of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature
of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player
of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played
out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front
of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that,
of the 3, Ox showed the
most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one
of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one
of the
most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already
of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs
of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways
most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack
of mobility is an albatross around the necks
of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because
of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits
We break down the board, highlight the
most profitable plays
of the day, answer questions and
teach members how to use the software so they can get the
most out of their membership.
That was one
of the topics discussed at a workshop in Vancouver, B.C., on love put on by Carrie Jenkins, a philosophy professor at the University
of British Columbia, that featured many wonderful speakers besides Jenkins, whose thought - provoking book, What Love Is And What It Could Be, comes
out in a few weeks, including Marina Adshade, UBC professor
of economics, author
of of Dollars and Sex: How Economics Influences Sex and entertaining TEDx speaker; and Mandy Len Catron, who
teaches writing at UBC and whose Modern Love essay on how to make anyone fall in love with you was one
of the
most - read Modern Loves, and that lead her to write a book on love essays that comes
out in 2017.
Out of everything that Megan ever
taught me, reminding me that I was enough was the
most important.