So while it's possible to open just the second email and ignore the first and third, for example,
most people act in sequence.
The problem is that
most people act like they do understand the unknowable.
Most people act the part when they're speaking to the hiring manager or other «important» people, but some will pull a Jekyll and Hyde act the moment they walk out the door, treating others with disdain or indifference.
And in fact when I'm asked, «What advice would you give individuals who are not going to dedicate themselves to this and what not,» I tell them, «The market might not be perfectly efficient, but for
most people acting as if it is,» and this is not the only way to get to an index fund, but it's one route to get to it, it's certainly one route that implies an index fund.
Not exact matches
But
most importantly, they
act as destinations; places that
people choose to go because they can both give what they want and get what they need.
«I think the way in which he
acts, especially his corrosive effect on norms — truth - telling being the
most important of them — has that staining effect on institutions and
people who are close to them.
The
act of writing is very hard for
most people.
Under the Uniform Trade Secrets
Act, adopted in
most states, information counts as a trade secret if it meets three criteria: The information must have independent economic value to
people outside the company, the information must be generally unknown and unlikely to be discovered by lawful means, and the owner of the secret must make efforts to maintain the secret.
Not only is it impossible to anticipate in such a code every possible variable or potential dilemma, but always «it is possible to satisfy the letter of the law while still committing an
act that
most reasonable
people would consider unethical or immoral.»
3) One of the
most interesting things about all this is that what we're seeing here is the undoing of the competitive market's tendency to prevent
people from
acting out their biases.
When all the
most successful
people in your chosen field are gathered, get yourself in the room however you can and then
act like you belong.
One of the very first
acts of business between two of the
most powerful
people on Earth — a duo whose to - do list involves addressing pretty fundamental disagreements on, among other things, the trade relationship that supports both economies — was to commit, publicly and unequivocally, to tackling an issue that affects literally half of each of their constituencies.
Most people won't
act unless they have a sense of imminent danger.
In the boardroom and on the potato field, McCain wants its
people to feel and
act like family, and for the
most part, they do.
The
most successful
people have adopted a set of habits that helps them attract opportunities, and then puts them in the right place at the right time to
act on them.
You're right about the main reason, but that's because
most people don't understand the purpose of Absolute Return investments is to diversify a portfolio — not
act as a substitute for long - only equity exposure (which as you say can be obtained very cheaply)
By now,
most people are likely aware of the government's attempts to use the All Writs
Act from 1789 as a tool to force Apple write new software with weaker security so that feds could unlock an iPhone 5c they had in custody.
Most people are stimulated by leadership roles, even in an
acting position.
Research shows that a sense of urgency is one of the
most powerful ways to spur an emotional reaction in
people who feel compelled to
act rashly.
In 1968, after a decade that saw the assassinations of John F. Kennedy, Martin Luther King Junior and Bobby Kennedy, Congress passed the Gun Control
Act, which, in part, grew the list of those
people who could not purchase guns, to
most convicted felons and mentally ill
people.
But the
act of directly asking for something can be a tremendous challenge that stymies even the
most successful
people.
Once in a while,
people are given a third -
person point of view and are asked by the author to
act on that knowledge, but for the
most part, we are stuck in first -
person.
I am VERY tired of
people preaching to me and others about how «a Christian would and should
act» when the hypocrisy of the matter is that I, a «none believer» practice «The Golden Rule» more than
most!
It's all about self control and respecting the dignity of the other
person during the
most beautiful
act a man and woman can engage in, not turning it into the
most popular contact sport of our generation.
Some researchers think humpbacks may be purely altruistic — meaning that they, unlike
most animals and, let's be real,
most people — are simply
acting out of the goodness of their hearts.
FOX has the
most wonderful talent for putting
people on the air who
act like they are on the third day of a raging meth binge.
Most priests are pretty liberal too... always being for «the poor» never telling the poor
people to get their
act together.
If it were the case that the Jews
acted wrongly by taking land from the Palistinians by force... it would be of course, one of the
most understandable
acts of aggression in History... after what was bestowed upon them in WWII what
people wouldn't suffer a temporary loss of sanity?
Most people believe they are
acting in accord with a God.
Some time fears and
acts of fears leads
people to what you fear
most to happen... so it is how it will be played that will determine the future... so as BO said that to show good feelings and give a helping hand will make you less enemies than if go on the bases of power and superiority...
What is
most upsetting about this is how juvenile these
people in question
act.
White House spokesman Josh Earnest said, «This wanton killing of innocents is just the
most recent of the many vicious
acts perpetrated by ISIL - affiliated terrorists against the
people of the region, including the murders of dozens of Egyptian soldiers in the Sinai, which only further galvanizes the international community to unite against ISIL.»
No, he
acted pretty normal, and did what
most religious
people of his day wanted him to do... to accuse Jesus of being a false Messiah and give Him over to the Roman officials for crucifixion.
When
people act «rationally» in the exchange of goods and services, that is, when they try to get the
most they can for the least payment in money or service, market activity increases and society as a whole benefits from the increased availability of desired goods and services.
If your
most valuable, defining core just is the self that you choose to express, there can be no real difference between you as a
person, and your
acts of self - expression; I can't affirm you and oppose those
acts.
Yet the weekly reiteration of the entire service (including the sermon) is the church's
most - used method of shaping
people for attitudes and
acts of ecclesial and social justice.
At times I
act «in the first
person,» while at other times, in fact
most of the time, a more habitual or pre-personal thread of occasions unifies my behavior.
The
most perfect mediator ought to have the
most perfect
act of mediation in regard to the
person in whose favour he intervenes.
, tried to fight off her attacker (an
act proven to be pointless, not to mention it's an ableist suggestion in the first place (doesn't take
people with physical or mental disabilities into consideration)-RRB-, didn't let her rapist in (even though
most rape victims know their attackers)-- she wouldn't have been raped.
Believe it or not, while
most people view death as a curse and a punishment from God, a proper understanding of death allows us to see it as a blessing and an
act of kindness from God.
Far from being an
act of rebellion or an open attempt outwardly to overthrow abused power, it was a quiet, constrained, symbolic
act that ironically caught the
person of highest power in the midst of a
most ordinary human activity.
The year 2006 may for
most people mark the tenth anniversary of the 1996 Welfare
Act, signed by Bill Clinton, after he had vetoed two previous efforts, and just before crucial midterm elections that November.
On the other hand, don't
most of us know
people who look and
act nothing like what we suppose someone created in God's image should look and
act like?
--
Most (if not all) «happy - clappy», evangelical churches
act in extroversion... but they will be quick to close borders and associate themselves only with «certain» other
people.
These days, in
most people's understanding, it carries the fullest possible weight of criticism and condemnation of a
person, rather than of an
act.
The
most negative statement by Paul regarding same - sex
acts occurs in Romans 1:24 - 27 where, in the context of a larger argument on the need of all
people for the gospel of Jesus Christ, certain homosexual behavior is given as an example of the «uncleanness» of idolatrous Gentiles.
But when we really look at the what blasphemy is, we find that
most of these sermons, books, and pastors were simply misinformed or were trying to control other
people to
act or behave a certain way.
God knew this in the Old Testament (and even today), and so allows
people to blame Him for the
most horrendous actions, not because He has done these things, and not because He has commanded that such things be done, but because He knows that if He does not
act as the scapegoat, we will destroy ourselves.
The Greeks believed (as do the
people of
most religions) that the gods are angry and need to be appeased (aka bribed) in order to
act nicely toward humans.
I think for the
most part you can't judge an entire group of
people all together in a lump, however when
most of them
act a certain way and the way is contemptible behavior, I think it's time to take a deep look at it.