Probably the main reason for the widespread adoption of deterministic hypotheses is that
most philosophers find it difficult to see how anything else is possible.
Not exact matches
Thus we
find examples of the just war tradition in theorists of the law of nations and in positive international law; we have a form of this tradition in modern military codes, rules of engagement, and praxis; and two of the
most important theorists of just war over the past forty years have been the Protestant theologian Paul Ramsey and the political
philosopher Michael Walzer.
But it is strange and striking how little else Nietzsche has to say out loud about family, because the classical or pagan pursuit of what it means for a family to be great is perhaps the
most significant and enduring example of noble values that a
philosopher of noble values could hope to
find.
The next and
most central stage of the paper is to ask if in the case of Whitehead too it might not be possible to
find a more flexible reading of a superficially unattractive
philosopher for revolutionary or socially transformative purposes.
Most of his book is a history of the unavailing efforts of
philosophers, since the time of Descartes, to
find certainty, to discover a set of sensations («raw feels» or clear and distinct ideas) or terms (analytical truths, the symbols of mathematical logic) that would provide a secure foundation for all human inquiries and activities.
Yet the editors
find themselves confirmed in the beliefs (1) that the philosophy of nature is an important and fruitful area for continuing exploration, especially if scientists and
philosophers can learn to work together, and (2) that for the time being Whitehead's rigorously articulated vision provides the
most promising basis for further reflection in this area.