Sentences with phrase «most present people»

Surround yourself with kind people: If you think about it, you are the sum of the ten most present people in your life.

Not exact matches

«Just as the person looking for a job ought to be presenting his or her best foot forward, the manager ought to be looking what will be most important to the job.

What entrepreneurs can glean from some of the most influential people from the past and present.

The following quotes are from four of the most influential people from the past and present.

Thiel's support for anti-aging research is perhaps the most extreme manifestation of his being a «definite optimist» — a person who, as Thiel defines the term in Zero to One, believes «the future will be better than the present if he plans and works to make it better.»

When it comes to sales, most salespeople and entrepreneurs think of the task as one they can easily break down to its basic components: You meet people, you present your products and / or services; and, if they're interested, they'll buy from you.

Most people tend to speak too fast when presenting, so slow it down.

So a sales person will be presented with a list of sales leads that are most likely to write a check, for example, without having to pore through their email and messages.

It's maybe one reason why people are so easily misled into climate change denial when there don't seem to be any definitive and reliable sources of data that are open to the public where information is presented in various different ways that most ordinary people are interested in.

His people, on this evening, were a peculiar lot: regulars, newcomers and, at present, the world's most important porn star — with her presidential ties and a reported six - figure reason not to confirm them — traveling for now without a proper assistant.

Self - comparison can be a strong influence on human behavior, and because people tend to display the most positive aspects of their lives on social media, it is possible for an individual to believe that their own life compares negatively to what they see presented by others.

If you're like most people, you'll need to manage finances for both present and future needs.

If you are one of those people, you have come to the right place as in this article, we are going to present the most important information you need to know about Bitcoin and Ethereum.

What is most uncomfortable about the present market environment is that even some people whom we respect are tossing out comments about market valuation here that are provably wrong, or at least require one to dispense with the entirety of historical evidence if their optimistic views are to be correct.

HOWEVER, if this person was running for public office, instead of the «feel - good» story here, the media would vilianize this church for some inane belief that they would take wildly out of context and present it to the American public as the most fundamentalist extreme church ever to lay it's foundation on our shores.

In other words with all the things going on in the world this long winded ambiguous rant about the religious beliefs of a horror writer whose name I've barely heard mentioned in the last decade is being presented as the most important information people need to know at this particular time.

Most anti-religious ppl on here seem to whine about science, history and the accuracy of information presented, I expect it from the non-religious as well.

I fear that most people would say they choose the second option, but when presented with piles and piles of cash, might actually choose the first.

It is unliveable at the level of society: hence, in Britain we have a government that lauds the freedom of the individual (and it should be noted in passing, but noted very well, that our present generation of politicians rarely talk of the «human person» or just of the «person», but usually of the «individual») but which has brought in some of the most draconian legislation in Europe designed to control what people say and do on certain issues so that society can proceed in its life as a unity and not just as a mere collection of individuals.

My own way of explaining this phenomenon is that these young people (who are most intelligent and can not be fooled by so much sham in present society) are really looking for a meaningful faith, for a satisfying form of transcendence.

The trend of modern thought, with its concentration upon making the most of this present life and the tacit assumption that death means extinction, makes it particularly easy for people to disbelieve in, or to ridicule, life after death.

Most of the Anglo - Catholic clergy who stayed in their ghetto did so because of their refusal to leave their people behind: asone Anglican priest who had attempted to take his Parish to Rome and had been repulsed by his local Catholic bishop put it to me, the essential was that «Rome has got to have a more creative view of the corporate nature of our present existence».

We learned the hard way that we can't invite most Christians to a dinner party with any LGBTQ person present.

To people like the present reviewer, who were lectured by scholars who discouraged this practice in favour of getting to know the text of a work, for example the Republic of Plato, without bothering about the background, the approach of most of the papers in this volume is novel and challenging.

Heretofore, most people, including most scientists, supposed that the world came into being in more or less its present form.

If Christianity be rightly understood and if Christians understand themselves correctly, things are exactly the opposite of what most Christians and non-Christians imagine: hope in the absolute future of God who is himself the eschatological salvation does not justify a fossilized conservatism which anxiously prefers the safe present to an unknown future; it is not a tranquillizing «opium for the people» in present sorrow; it is, on the contrary, the authoritative call to an ever - renewed, confident exodus from the present into the future, even in this world.

This perspective reminds one that persons are the organizing center of their interpersonal network; that who they are is an expression of the quality of their most significant relationships, past and present; that they still carry within them hurts from past relationships; that their present relational system sustains and reinforces their diminished growth; that their hurt will be healed only if they can establish more growthful relationships as they move into the future.

Christians should be the most fun - loving and joyous people on the planet, because not only do we have a bright future, we've got a great present as well.

Of all people to present «The Sound of Music,» Lady Gaga, affectionately nicknamed «Mother Monster» --- and best known for her rebellious anthems and provocative attire — is surely one of the most unexpected.

James» example is nonetheless not without value, as it presents a dignified way of life different from that preached by most present - day conventional people abreast of the zeitgeist, who can not help dismissing both Mauriac and James as relics of an outmoded past.

To all people, to serve the present age, our calling to full field, Most of us, who has the most to say, knows very little about the Word of God (BIBMost of us, who has the most to say, knows very little about the Word of God (BIBmost to say, knows very little about the Word of God (BIBLE).

Because we ministers rightly believe that involvement in the reconciling process is a central task, we are more reluctant than most people to step back when, at least for the time being, the initial conditions for that process are not present.

well just thinking about these wars in the muslim / mid-east world over religious differences (which may reflect mental states in many ways) in a world where most realize that living in the present moment is best way to happiness and being in the moment in non-strife and awareness through the teachings of masters such as found in the buddhist, taoist, zen, etc., etc., etc. spriritually based practices of religious like thought and teachings, etc. that to ask these scientifically educated populace whom have access to vast amounts of knowledges and understandings on the internet, etc. to believe in past beliefs that perhaps gave basis and inspiration to that which followed — but is not the end all of all times or knowledges — and is thus — non self - sustaining in a belief that does not encompass growth of knowledge and understanding of all truths and being as it is or could be — is to not respect the intelligence and minds and personage of even themselves — not to be disrespected nor disrespectful in any way — only to point out that perhaps too much is asked to put others into the cloak of blind faith and adherance to the past that disregards the realities of the present and the potential of the future... so you try to live in the past — and destroy your present and your future — where is the intelligence in that — and why do people continually fear monger or allow to be fear — mongered into this destructive vision of the future based upon the past?

(Experts on both sides present sophisticated jurisprudential arguments in defense of their positions, but most people look more to congenial outcomes than to consistent principles of law.)

You wrote: but what Kaiser fails to understand is that it is exactly the kind of theology he presents in this book which has caused most of those people to leave the church and give up on God.

Kaiser thinks this is a bad thing (I think it is good), but what Kaiser fails to understand is that it is exactly the kind of theology he presents in this book which has caused most of those people to leave the church and give up on God.

This individualism has dismissed both the extrinsic and the intrinsic value of each human being in favor of material and professional indices of success that most people believe are due to luck as much as anything else (hence the increasing popularity of lotteries) Because the apocalyptic worldview of the early church has now been replaced with the desperate and meaningless finality of possible nuclear annihilation, eschatological expectations and hope for reversal of human fortunes have given way to a «present - only» scheme of refetence even in Christian theology.

One may see the same tendency in the ruthless invasion of privacy, exploiting the most personal details of private life In the guise of presenting «news», and no person In any walk of life is protected against this kind of exploitation.

Because the claims of Darwinism are presented to the public as «science,» most people are under the impression that they are supported by direct evidence such as experiments and fossil record studies.

LOGOS must be animated by the eros or love that's only present in persons and is, in fact, most deeply personal.

If the divine mystery is present in a special way among the poorest and most misused of his or her children, as the biblical images and stories — from the slaves in Egypt to the official lynching of Jesus — constantly remind us, then allegedly religious people who insulate themselves from the city are putting themselves at considerable risk.

The causes of Disease and Religion are the most prolific killers of people on this planet both past and present.

What if the fact is that God is present, loving perfectly and the source of much good and to «punish» and invoke «the most horrific of reprisals» is to weep about people who have not returned his love but rejected him and say «OK have it your way?»

From MamaNym: This year I'm writing 40 Lenten Love Letters to people who have had a big impact on my life, both in the present, and in the past, including some people who don't like me and some who have passed away... and especially to God, and even one to myself (which seems to be the most difficult for me to begin).

In fact, most people believe that they are presented with two contradictory systems from which they must choose.

Many members in mid-size churches and most members of large membership churches listed the pastor along with the friendliness of the people as the principle reasons for joining their present church.

A glaring example of the problem this creates is the present state of television news on the TV networks; most people prefer its simplistic presentation over a more complex and demanding one, and, by pandering to this preference, TV encourages the least, rather than the most, from individual viewers.

We can detect the reality of this Spirit most vividly in present social, political, environmental, and religious movements that seek the full inclusion and unity of those beings and persons who have been left out by our restrictive social, political, economic, environmental, and religious practices.

What He has presented is this vast, complex, and amazing creation of the physical world — which most people know can only be attributed to an intelligent and unseen, higher being.

I have participated in this type of activity in the past and have noticed that in many groups, most people do not know each other and accordingly have no way of knowing if the other people present are believers.