Sentences with phrase «most scientific positions»

Not exact matches

As Pfizer recently announced, the company has increased investment in areas that will position us to deliver on some of the most promising scientific advances.
Most of the contentiousness in this debate is largely born of no education or miseducation as to what the various scientific positions are.
Richard Dawkins, in his celebrated book, The Selfish Gene, exemplifies the same position.3 And a similar reduction of biology to a molecular science may be found in the writings of E.O. Wilson, Ernst Mayr, Jacques Monod and numerous other highly respected scientific writers.4 In Chance and Necessity, for example, Monod gives one of the most forceful renditions of the view that biochemical analysis is «obviously» the sole avenue to understanding the secret of life.5 Decades ago Jacques Loeb had already set forth the program of inquiry still emulated today by many biologists:
«Several amici supporting DOMA challenge the conclusion that for most people sexual orientation is not a matter of choice, but they offer no credible scientific support for their position.
Cementing Inspec's position as one of the most extensive sources of engineering research in the world, the milestone has been hit with an important piece of medical technology research, highlighting the IET's commitment to making essential, high quality scientific and technological intelligence available worldwide.
NIH examines indicators such as the track record of graduates in academic medicine positions, time to graduation, overall student happiness, how well the program integrates the medical and scientific training, and most importantly, the quality of the scientists and science available to the MD / PhD students; NIH manifests disapproval or approval of a program by decreasing, increasing, or maintaining the number of funded trainee positions at that institution.
The extraordinary incidence of coupling among scientists, most argue, is due to the extreme time requirements of scientific positions and the fact that scientists are less likely to meet people outside of their profession who understand their passion for science.
Whether or not a long - distance relationship is a part of a scientific couple's experience, most couples eventually seek permanent positions at the same institutions or in the same geographic regions.
In the debate over scientific immigration, however — another symptom of the system's decay — the voices of the scientific and technical workers most affected, the Ph.D. s in precarious early - career positions and the technical workers facing competition from abroad, have scarcely been heard, Hira says.
In most cases, it is next to impossible for a U.S. citizen to work as a paid member of the scientific staff in a career position at either an academic institution or European laboratory such as a Max Plank institute or the European synchrotron light sources.
The intense competition for funding presents a growing challenge for scientific researchers — those who receive financial support are in a better position to bolster their early research efforts and are more likely to identify solutions to the most complex scientific questions and to some of society's most pressing problems.
It's not as though even the most benign denialists are offering anything scientific to back up their positions.
«Not a single paper in a large sample of peer - reviewed scientific journals between 1993 and 2003 refuted the consensus position, summarized by the National Academy of Sciences, that «most of the observed warming of the last 50 years is likely to have been due to the increase in greenhouse gas concentrations.
* The biggest alarmists made their way into most of the «scientific» publications, groups, and government positions.
Numerous studies have found near - unanimous scientific agreement on human - caused climate change, with perhaps the most well - known study on the matter finding that 97 percent of scientific papers taking a position on the cause of global warming agree that humans are behind it.
If the idea is to defend what currently appears to be the position of most (but not all) experts and relevant scientific institutions against ignorant criticism, I don't have anything against it.
The most common position of my scientific friends is that we clearly don't have enough information to make the claims we make about climate.
Two, in response to arguments from some climate change skeptics, many scientific organizations with expertise relevant to climate change have endorsed the consensus position that «most of the global warming in recent decades can be attributed to human activities» including the following: • American Association for the Advancement of Science • American Astronomical Society • American Chemical Society • American Geophysical Union • American Institute of Physics • American Meteorological Society • American Physical Society • Australian Coral Reef Society • Australian Meteorological and Oceanographic Society • Australian Bureau of Meteorology and the CSIRO • British Antarctic Survey • Canadian Foundation for Climate and Atmospheric Sciences • Canadian Meteorological and Oceanographic Society • Environmental Protection Agency • European Federation of Geologists • European Geosciences Union • European Physical Society • Federation of American Scientists • Federation of Australian Scientific and Technological Societies • Geological Society of America • Geological Society of Australia • International Union for Quaternary Research (INQUA) • International Union of Geodesy and Geophysics • National Center for Atmospheric Research • National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration • Royal Meteorological Society • Royal Societyscientific organizations with expertise relevant to climate change have endorsed the consensus position that «most of the global warming in recent decades can be attributed to human activities» including the following: • American Association for the Advancement of Science • American Astronomical Society • American Chemical Society • American Geophysical Union • American Institute of Physics • American Meteorological Society • American Physical Society • Australian Coral Reef Society • Australian Meteorological and Oceanographic Society • Australian Bureau of Meteorology and the CSIRO • British Antarctic Survey • Canadian Foundation for Climate and Atmospheric Sciences • Canadian Meteorological and Oceanographic Society • Environmental Protection Agency • European Federation of Geologists • European Geosciences Union • European Physical Society • Federation of American Scientists • Federation of Australian Scientific and Technological Societies • Geological Society of America • Geological Society of Australia • International Union for Quaternary Research (INQUA) • International Union of Geodesy and Geophysics • National Center for Atmospheric Research • National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration • Royal Meteorological Society • Royal SocietyScientific and Technological Societies • Geological Society of America • Geological Society of Australia • International Union for Quaternary Research (INQUA) • International Union of Geodesy and Geophysics • National Center for Atmospheric Research • National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration • Royal Meteorological Society • Royal Society of the UK
Because none of the developed countries were willing to make emissions reduction commitments congruent with what scientific community said was necessary to protect them, some of the most vulnerable developing countries saw the developed countries» positions in Copenhagen as ominous, perhaps a death sentence.
I find the GMO and climate change discussions most similar, in that those who oppose scientific consensus have the most trouble articulating any argument to support their position.
This is in strong contrast with the current position of the US National Academy of Sciences:»... there is now strong evidence that significant global warming is occurring... It is likely that most of the warming in recent decades can be attributed to human activities... The scientific understanding of climate change is now sufficiently clear to justify nations taking prompt action.»
In other words, most people think that their specific position on any scientific issue is at the golden mean, and anyone who believes more than they do is a true believer and anyone who doubts more than they do is a denier.
In addition, most of the leading scientific organizations worldwide have issued public statements endorsing this position,» according to NASA.
While it's too early to definitively handicap the electoral impact of a Republican call for carbon taxation (we have, after all, no political data points to go by), it's not too early to handicap the electoral impact of the position forwarded by most of the Republican presidential candidates today: pretending that climate change is an open scientific question while offering cheap fossil fuel as the holy grail of federal policy.
The score on PC1 shows a separation between on the one hand the position that Arctic sea ice extent is shrinking and that this poses a threat to polar bears (most scientific articles and science - based blogs) and on the other side the position that Arctic sea ice is not shrinking or that it's due to natural variability and that polar bears are not threatened (pseudo-skeptical blogs).
Instead, Giaever has used his position of scientific authority as a Nobel Laureate to misinform people about a subject on which he has not even done the most basic research.
The following scientific organizations endorse the consensus position that «most of the global warming in recent decades can be attributed to human activities»:
In other words, do you dispute that most of the recent scientific literature that takes a position with regards to AGW, endorses AGW.
The topics will include a review of 2016 talc verdicts, the historic role of government regulatory bodies, the plaintiff and defense position on key scientific and medical causation issues, and an inside evaluation from the hottest and most rapidly emerging jurisdictions.
Sure, depending on the company and exact needs, certain positions may require scientific training, but the most critical element of any taste tester is exceptional sensory capabilities.
Our recruitment specialists focus on the specialised scientific disciplines in order to find and place the most relevant candidates for each position.
The document can be a resource for most upper level management positions in technology, engineering or scientific fields.
While most positions don't require a formal, lengthy C.V. (these are mostly used in academic or scientific fields, and include a list of publications and research projects), they do require a bit more explanation of your background than just a few bullet points.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z