Most social scientists believe that both information deficit / misinformation surplus and cultural biases contribute to the problem.
Most social scientists would agree that an individual's personality and the situations they encounter have important effects on their behavior and that the two are not mutually exclusive.
Tough says that until recently,
most social scientists believed the most important factor in a child's success was his or her IQ.
Most social scientists are aware that each of us has an aspect of our personality that does not easily fit into the social settings in which we find ourselves.
At the bishops» meeting, Philadelphia Archbishop Charles Chaput asked, given this research, what do
most social scientists think about same - sex families and child well - being?
Not exact matches
Maybe the clearest and
most dystopian glimpse of where all of this is headed comes courtesy of Tim Hwang, who breeds artificially intelligent «socialbots» as co-founder and chief
scientist of the Orwellian - sounding Pacific
Social Architecting Corporation.
She talks about the scores of ethnographies she'd read, and how white, liberal
social scientists were shocked, shocked to discover that
most of the Klan members they studied were pretty nice people.
The research threw up a concept known as homophily — a word invented by
social scientists to describe the sociological phenomenon in which people are
most drawn to others resembling themselves.
While the thought of having difficult conversations may fill
most of us with dread, business
social scientist Joseph Grenny says avoiding conflict is a big mistake.
Although he carefully denied (as
social scientists do) that he was making predictions, he wrote that «we may expect these gradual changes in population composition to encourage many, or
most, of the following developments.»
Although,
most Ph.D. candidates in the
social sciences have well developed writing skills, which you do not), yet your post is peppered with terms used in ways no natural
scientist would use them.
However, the major problem with this is, as smart as Richard Dawkins may be, he's not some super
social scientist (based on my interactions with
scientists, and I am one, we're not the
most socially blessed people around), and the reaction to such acts from non-atheists are probably hurting the cause more than anything.
Consensus - oriented political leaders, advocates of economic modernization, and professional
social scientists have all argued, in one way or another, that economic self - interest does — and should — matter
most in politics.
I suspected when I first heard this claim that the Committee on the Status of Black Americans, loaded as it was with
social scientists, had demolished a straw man, a bloodless construct so rigidly defined as to be meaningless in terms of the actual lives of the humans who inhabit the nation's ghettos and who, for the
most part, make up what has come to be called the underclass.
Even after
social scientists had accumulated data demonstrating that the optimistic predictions concerning the impact of divorce and single - parent families on women and children had failed to materialize,
most mainline churches ignored this evidence, continuing to say little or nothing about the issues.
Carter's fascination with the West leads him on to learned discussion of Frederick Jackson Turner's «frontier thesis» (which, despite flaws, Carter holds to be the
most influential statement ever by an historian of America), along with the views of Russian ecologists, American
social scientists, and a wide variety of conservationists.
In addition to helping parents make the best and
most appropriate decision for themselves, the information provided here should also be of use to educators, health professionals, public health officials, the media, sleep researchers, child protective services, coroners, forensic pathologists, anthropologists, psychiatrists, psychologists and other
social scientists, as well as researchers in a variety the developmental fields including human biology.
In a recent book by Dr. Peter Cook (Mothering Denied) describes better than
most others the difficulties that Dr. Jay Belsky has had convincing his fellow
scientists that
social ideology is passing for, if not dictating, scientific interpretations of studies on this issue (as is true for the bedsharing debate), in favor of dismissing the serious concerns and negative developmental correlates of infants and children being placed for long hours, early in their lives, in daycare centers.
It is something new, at least in the minds of
most scientists, health workers, and
social engineers — if there is such a thing.
Social scientists most commonly view citizenship as a juridical status conferred by states upon individuals in a national community.
As a
scientist, how can you
most effectively use
social media to share your research and engage the public, and which platform is best suited for your goals?
Ultimately, this could help direct
scientists and clinicians toward prevention and treatment options that make the
most sense for
social pain.
Efforts to rethink STEM education with a civic mindset date to the late 1990s, prompted by then - AAAS President Jane Lubchenco's urgent call for
scientists to enter into «a new
social contract» to devote their talents to society's
most pressing problems and communicate what they know to others, Reilly said.
«Our mission is to provide the
most robust data to NGOs, governments, biophysical and
social scientists to develop their own models.»
There are many ways in which this
most famous quote may be interpreted, but to us
social scientists it illustrates perfectly the first and
most important law in networking, that is, the law of the Small World.
Couple the stressors with limited
social support —
most women
scientists have few such resources — and the imposter phenomenon, and it's easy to see why academic women often are an unhealthy lot.
Social scientists and earth
scientists are the
most publicly engaged, he said.
Alternatively, some other
scientists may associate the word with
social networking: communicating online with massive numbers of widely scattered people,
most of them strangers.
The linguist Noam Chomsky, the
most famous living
scientist by some measures, has also repeatedly criticized
social media for reducing serious public discourse to, well, 140 characters.
Scientists with a high score on the index, named after the reality TV star Kim Kardashian, one of the
most popular celebrities on the
social media platform, should «get off Twitter» and write more papers, suggested Hall, who works at the University of Liverpool in the United Kingdom.
We have compiled a list of the 50
most followed
scientists on the
social media platform and their academic citation counts — and calculated their K - index by drawing on citation data from Google Scholar (A fuller explanation of how we compiled the list is below, at the end of the full story).
One thing is clear, even with a conservative definition of «
scientist»: The top of the fame ranking is dominated by
social scientists such as Chomsky — by far the
most famous living
scientist, as measured by mD..
Scientists who want to bring their projects to
social media come to Brydon, who helps them determine how best to reach their desired audiences on the
most appropriate platform.
In an informal survey of recruiters and academic
scientists on hiring panels,
most said that a candidate's decision to participate or not in
social media wouldn't change their hiring decisions.
The
most significant finding of a recent study considered by the Ethical, Legal and
Social Implications Group of the US Human Genome Project was the lack of demand for testing: people don't want it (New
Scientist, 18 September).
The results pinpoint which environmental and
social factors are
most important for plague transmission and could help
scientists refine disease control measures in the future.
Inspired by the flap over the Kardashian Index, Science has compiled a list of the
most followed
scientists on the
social media platform
But in previous ripostes to the book's critics,
most notably in a 19 June Huffington Post article titled «Five Critics Say You Shouldn't Read This «Dangerous» Book,» Wade charged that his critics were «indoctrinated in the
social - science creed that prohibits any role for evolution in human affairs» and contended that the book's central argument «has not been challenged by any serious
scientist.»
The House bill, in contrast, sets specific targets for each directorate — an approach that
most scientists view as micromanaging the agency — and would shrink the
social, behavioral, and economic sciences directorate from $ 256 million this year to $ 150 million in 2015.
The
most common broad fields of study for immigrant
scientists and engineers in 2013 were engineering, computer and mathematical sciences, and
social and related sciences.
Based on previous research, the
scientists expected the orphaned juveniles to play less frequently and smoothly than the mother - reared chimpanzees: After all, the orphans had missed their
most important caretaker throughout a sensitive socialisation period, and continued to lack a safe and facilitating
social environment provided by their mothers.
They found that cohesive clustering of the kind where an individual bonds with friends of friends, something
scientists call «triadic closure,» was the
most consistent factor influencing the long - term dynamics of the
social structure of spotted hyenas.
Career analyst Dan Pink examines the puzzle of motivation, starting with a fact that
social scientists know but
most managers don't: Traditional rewards talk - Traduzione del vocabolo e dei suoi composti, e discussioni del forum.
Career analyst Dan Pink examines the puzzle of motivation, starting with a fact that
social scientists know but
most managers don't: Traditional rewards Elizabeth Gilbert muses on the impossible things we expect from artists and geniuses — and shares the radical idea that, instead of the rare person being
Taking into consideration broad, economic, technological, and demographic changes, the contributors — all leading
social scientists in their fields — suggest that these global transformations will require youth to develop new skills, sensibilities, and habits of mind that are far ahead of what
most educational systems can now deliver.
Social scientists, by contrast, are
most often testing the effects of programs funded by government or by philanthropic organizations.
And yet it will come as no surprise that
social scientists, like people in general, find that
most adolescent witnesses remain uninvolved when someone else actually suffers the impact of bullying, be it by the fists of a lone assailant or by the cutting words of the members of a popular clique.
These studies are called randomized field trials and are increasingly recognized by
social scientists as the
most definitive in establishing causality, although observational studies that control for other probable causes can also be valuable.
In modern times, these «softer» skills have been
most recognized and valued by
social scientists whose research has linked them to positive development and wellbeing.
Most modern early - warning systems evolved out of the work of Robert Balfanz, the co-director of the Everyone Graduates Center and a research
scientist at the Center for
Social Organization of Schools at Johns Hopkins University in Baltimore, and from the University of Chicago Consortium on Chicago School Research.