You also seem to equate the site with a single person, presumably Kim Capria who is the main person being «debunked» by dailycaller, but the article in question is written by someone different, so
this mostly ad hominem attack is completely irrelevant to the argument.
The Monckton article seemed perfectly reasonable to me, and the attacks on him here are
mostly ad hominem.
The Monckton article seemed perfectly reasonable to me, and the attacks on him here are
mostly ad hominem.
Not exact matches
With rare exceptions, when I go looking, I instead find
mostly snark,
ad hominem attacks, and condescension.
It had some minor credibility problems,
mostly automatic
ad hominems from the folks who didn't like the 17,000 or so scientists (predominately) who expressed doubt with GHGs causing global warming.