If you have experienced a work - related injury, you can talk with one of our experienced Schenectady repetitive
motion injury claim lawyers.
Not exact matches
However, eight of those reasons were circumstances that arose after the commencement of the action and were thus irrelevant to the analysis (the defendant's offer to settle; the defendant's failure to apply to move the action to the Small
Claims Court; the defendant's denial of liability for the plaintiff's
injury; the insurer's characterization of the collision as low impact; the exchange of 60 documents; the defendant's
motion for a Rule 66 hearing and eventual removal; a Rule 28 examination of a witness; and the absence of expert evidence tendered by the defendant).
In the threshold
motion in Maxwell v. Luck, previously discussed here, Justice Howell pushed back against what is increasingly becoming a routine attempt by insurers to dismiss chronic pain on the basis of the lack of objective symptoms in personal
injury claims.
Congratulations to trial counsel, Robert S. Deutsch and Nancy L. Pennie, and post-trial
motion authors, Nancy L. Pennie, Elliott J. Zucker, and Oded Burger, on a post-verdict dismissal of all personal
injury claims against their client.
Successfully defended [1] against a summary judgment
motion brought by Zuber and Company on a multi-million dollar personal
injury claim.
Metro brought a
motion for summary judgment to order Cloverdale Mall to indemnify it for the cost of litigating the personal
injury claim, pursuant to the provision in the lease.
We handle all types of work
injury accidents and workers compensation
claims in California as well as those related to occupational diseases and repetitive
motion injuries.
With the help of an Illinois
injury attorney, Ottawa couple Donald and Janet Maxon filed a
motion urging Ottawa Publishing to release the names of two commentators they
claim made defamatory statements about them.
Seventh Circuit affirms
motion to dismiss insured
claim for personal
injury insurance coverage based upon lack of publication in defamation
claim Lewis Wagner Insurance Law Alerts Defender Sec Co v. First Mercury Ins Co
The Plaintiff, Gyorffy, sued Drury and
claimed that he had suffered a severe whiplash
injury which caused continuous and permanent back pain, acute and chronic pain in his right shoulder, continuous headaches, and decreased range of
motion in his spine.
We do this by providing many real - life samples of pleadings, discovery,
motions and other weapons in our arsenal to maximize the value of our clients» personal
injury claims.
After the verdict, the defendants brought a «threshold
motion» (Shaw v. Mkheyan, 2017 ONSC 851) for a declaration that Mr. Shaw's
claims for general damages and future care costs were barred on the basis that his
injuries did not fall within the exceptions to the statutory immunity provided for in sections 267.5 (3)(b) and 267.5 (b) of the Insurance Act, RSO 1990, c. I. 8 and the applicable regulations (the «threshold provisions»).
In fact, repetitive
motion injuries from typing and using the computer are among the most common workers» compensation
claims.