But why does partial range of
motion training produce less hypertrophy, but greater joint angle - specific strength gains?
Even so, McMahon et al. (2013) did find that full range of
motion training produced similar increases in EMG amplitude at all joint angles, while partial range of motion training left EMG amplitude unchanged short muscle lengths, and reduced EMG amplitude at longer other muscle lengths.
Not exact matches
• A sudden collapse in fertility
produces a slow -
motion train wreck in a third - world society, as the age cohorts collapse in accordion fashion.
One required them to make the cursor move in the same direction as in the
training task, while the second required the same action as the
training task but
produced different cursor
motion.
For instance, when a user steps off the
train, that jerkier
motion involved in walking
produces a different signature.
Researchers
train them to recognize keystrokes by feeding the programs a bunch of
motion sensor data labeled with the key tap that
produces particular movement.
Since the hips are multidirectional joints that can
produce force in three planes of
motion, the wide stance squat provides a superior possibility to
train the hips in all three planes and develop stable hip joints by
producing larger hip extension movements and greater hip flexion than narrow stance squats.
And
training predominantly at a short muscle length is probably the main reason why partial range of
motion exercises tend to
produce such different results from full range of
motion exercises.
Accommodating resistance
training transfers well to constant load strength, and also seems to
produce greater joint angle - specific strength gains towards the middle of the exercise range of
motion, greater improvements in repetition strength, and greater high - velocity strength gains.
Similarly, accommodating resistance
training (adding bands or chains to a barbell) can be used to
produce an approximately constant externally - applied force over the whole exercise range of
motion.
Still others favor the image of a «loosely coupled
train» where movement at one end doesn't necessarily
produce any
motion at the other.
While we are
trained to think of briefs and
motions as work product, lawyers should consider every type of document, e-mail, or opinion they
produce as overall work product.