The federal judge presiding over the corruption trial of former Nassau County Executive Edward Mangano, his wife Linda, and former Oyster Bay Supervisor John Venditto has denied all defense
motions challenging the case against them.
Not exact matches
The federal judge presiding over the corruption trial of former Nassau County Executive Edward Mangano, his wife, Linda, and former Oyster Bay Supervisor John Venditto has denied all defense
motions challenging the government's
case against them.
Arguing a
motion he filed to
challenge the court's summons, the lawyer said he would not be able to testify in the matter because of the existing relationship between his chambers and the third defendant in the
case (Slok Nigeria Limited).
when you look around you see contractors in slow
motion every where but doing nothing on ground.take a clear
case of jakande gate I solo to bucknor, isheri osun, ijegun rd project by hitech engineering awarded by tinubu in 2005 and later by fashola in 2008, up till today not even a single km of that road had constructed, not even a meter of drainage and the deck on pile bridge been constructed since 2008 have not gone half way.any lagosian residing at this communities must have one health
challenge or the other because of the very terrible conditions of that road.Nigerians if the APC example in Lagos is what Nigerians will get from APC presidency, it is better we all go on our collective knees that God should destroy this party of falsehood, mischief, looters and wicked men and women.
â $ œWe canâ $ ™ t be that hard on Penfield, because the number of
cases where he was able to study head movement was quite limited, and studying head
motion as he did, by applying an electrode directly to the brain, creates some
challenges, â $ says lead author Buz Jinnah, MD, professor of neurology, human genetics and pediatrics at Emory University School of Medicine.
Participants in the Thirty Meter Telescope contested
case have filed a flurry of
motions ahead of today's meeting in Hilo, from declaring Mauna Kea sacred to ongoing
challenges to Riki May Amano's...
On March 4, Los Angeles County Superior Court Judge Rolf Treu rejected a
motion to dismiss the Vergara v. California
case and continue the state's education trial where nine students are
challenging the laws over teacher job protection.
The
motion also notifies the Court of a district court's dismissal of the ACLU's
case challenging the voucher program.
Amicus Curiae Brief of Public Law Center, NCLC, Public Counsel in Support of Plaintiffs»
Motion for Preliminary Injunction in
Case Challenging Dep» t of Education's Abandonment of Full Loan Relief for Defrauded Corinthian Students (Manriquez v. DeVos, April 16, 2018)
Her testimony in that
case would likely
challenge any argument that her actions in the current
case were, as her attorneys suggest in their
motion of opposition, «reasonable» when it comes to the treatment of outdoor cats (owned or unowned).
A California insurance defense associate had two thoughts about what opportunity looked like for her: «If you're not given increasingly greater responsibility,
challenges and chances to do all aspects of a
case (i.e., mediation, arguing
motions, and trial), then an associate will look elsewhere to get those things.»
In the
case of Dougall v. Dougall, the Arizona Court of Appeals addressed an appeal by Mr. Dougall of the trial court's denial of his
motion for reconsideration
challenging an order pertaining to payment of spousal maintenance arrearages to Mrs. Dougall.
We will file
motions challenging the government's
case on every factual and legal issue, and we regularly obtain the dismissal of charges for our clients prior to trial.
Due to efficient and effective
case management, attorneys from Sidley & Austin LLP and Spesia & Ayers successfully argued that the injunction was warranted because the pipeline company had received condemnation authority from the Illinois Commerce Commission and the trial court had already denied the landowners attempt to
challenge that authority in a traverse and
motion to dismiss.
The presenters will provide concrete
case studies about how the full array of post-conviction options can be used, together with
motions to reopen, to
challenge even old removal orders.
The Criminal Appellate Court system is designed up to allow the convicted the ability to request a review of another court's decision, change or withdraw a plea, and make
motions for a variety of legal purposes including to
challenge imprisonment, an unfair sentence, or, in some
cases, have the court consider new evidence that could not have been known prior to a verdict (such as DNA evidence proving innocence.)
This
case involves a constitutional
challenge to a zoning ordinance, enacted by appellant city of Renton, Washington, that prohibits adult
motion picture theaters from locating within 1,000 feet of any residential zone, single - or multiple - family dwelling, church, park, or school.
The defendant also unsuccessfully
challenged other judges who heard
motions in the
case on the grounds of reasonable apprehension of bias.