Sentences with phrase «movement between member states»

First, the CJEU decided in Case C ‑ 451 / 05 ELISA that the French legislation unduly restricted capital movement between Member States and secondly, the it decided in Case C - 72 / 09 Établissements Rimbaud that this was also true between for capital movement between a Member State and EEA - countries under Art. 40 of the Agreement on the European Economic Area.

We are not equipped to deal with new immigration arrangements after 44 years of free movement between member states.

(i) With respect of liberalising capital movements between Member States: the objective of establishing the internal market and (ii) with respect of liberalising capital movements between Member States and third countries: the objective of supporting the euro as an attractive currency in the international financial markets.

Not exact matches

The single market is a deeper form of co-operation between member states that allows the free movement of goods, services, money, and people in the bloc.

Though Barna reports that the house church movement in Western Christianity is multiplying rapidly (somewhere between 5 - 20 million people in the United States attend a house church), the statistics also show that the vast majority of these house church members transferred from an «institutional» church to a house church.

The reason being that free movement of labour between member states (one the EU's four freedoms) permitted large - scale migration from East to West, which is alleged to have had impacts such as bidding down the wages of low - skilled workers, and increasing crime.

The decision of the CJEU further expands the concept of «final decision'triggering the ne bis in idem, confirming the validity of the previously consolidated trend which, on the one hand, recognises a strong importance to the mutual trust between Member States, and on the other hand acknowledges the inherent link between ne bis in idem and the freedom of movement in the EU.

Article 63 TFEU prohibits «all restrictions on the movement of capital between Member States and between Member States and third countries».

It claims that a certain degree of financial solidarity between Member States is inherent in all EU instruments relating to the rights of free movement and residence.

30 It should be noted that the EU and FEU Treaties do not contain any express reference to movements of capital between Member States and OCTs.

[s] ince the British Virgin Islands, where [the companies Lovett Overseas SA and Grebell Investments SA] are registered, are included in the list of OCTs in Annex II to the FEU Treaty, it is necessary to consider whether Article 63 TFEU applies to movements of capital between Member States and OCTs.

The CJEU leaves the remainder of the preliminary questions unanswered, such as whether the relationship between an OCT and its «own» Member State is an internal situation — which it is in my view [12]-- to which the free movement provisions of the OCT - Decision and / or TFEU do not apply (at all).

Let's try to compare the point 50 of the opinion: «While the movement of citizens of the Union between Member States is governed by EU law, and in particular by Article 21 TFEU and Directive 2004/38, the same does not apply to visits to Member States by Heads of State» which basically says that the movement of diplomats falls outside the scope of EU law, with the judgment of the Court in paragraph 51: «Accordingly, the fact that a Union citizen performs the duties of a Head of State is such as to justify a limitation, based on international law, on the exercise of the right of free movement conferred on that person by Article 21 TFEU.».

It could have been an aggravating factor in terms of free movement, but as far as State aid law is concerned, selectivity has to be examined at the level of one Member State only, the decisive criterion being whether the measure differentiates between undertakings or sectors that are in a comparable factual and legal situation.

This is in line with the Court's consistent jurisprudence that includes actual as well as potential effects, whether or on trade between Member States (or on the free movement of goods) in the scope of EU law.

Lastly, however, the Advocate General accepted the existence of implied shared powers between the EU and the Member States in the field of portfolio investment on the basis of the free movement of capital provisions (paras. 363 - 370, again siding with the Commission).

Does the ruling strike the right balance between the regulatory freedom of Member States and the need to ensure freedom of movement for service providers?

The questions raised by the present case essentially ask, first, whether the French tax on the market value of immovable property owned in France by a company established in a Member State is also applicable where the company is established in an overseas country or territory (OCT), being in the present case the British Virgin Islands, and, second, whether the joint and several liability for payment of that tax on the part of any legal person interposed between the party or parties liable to the tax and the immovable properties located in France constitutes a restriction of free movement of capital.

Smlouvyo 4, paragraph 2 of the European Union and Article 3, paragraph 1 of Council Regulation (EC) No 1408/71 (or Article 4 of the European Parliament and Council Regulation (EC) No 883/2004), the fact that the Czech authorities could zaokolností what vprojednávané things, provide preferential treatment (kdávce compensatory allowance at the age where the amount of benefits granted under Article 20 of the Treaty concluded 29th 10th 1992 between the Czech and the Slovak Republic on Social Security and Council Regulation (EC) No 1408 to 1471 (Regulation č.883 / 2004) lower than the dose that would be received, if the pension calculated under the laws of the Czech Republic), only citizens of the Czech Republic, if ktakovému treatment creates a fundamental right to security in old age unloaded by the Constitutional Court of the Czech Republic specifically in relation kdobám pension acquired vzaniklé CSFR and perceived as part of the national identity, and, if such treatment is stonarušit right of free movement of workers as a fundamental right of the Union, a situation kdybyposkytnutí reciprocal treatment accorded to nationals of EU Member States kteřítakézískali vzaniklé CSFR equivalent of pension security led kvýznamnému threat from the financial stability of the pension fund of the Czech Republic?