The central «positive» moral about how best to negotiate between these two models is this: Focus on the nature of the basic
movement of theological study as a theological question, not as a question about the psychology of learning, nor even as a question about the logical relations among various subjects studied in theological education.
Not exact matches
However, if the subjects
of study are concrete networks
of human practices by which communities
of faith attempt to respond to God faithfully, and if they are practices which mediate an understanding
of God, then the
movement of theological schooling is more like an engaged meditative gaze than it is like problem solving.
On this second view, insofar as persons have apprehended God through the medium
of Christian myths, symbols, and rites, their subjectivity will be shaped by a distinctive dynamic and structure which then dictates the proper
movement and structure
of theological study.
Therefore we can not adopt the suggestion that the structure and
movement of a
theological course
of study should simply reflect the essential structure
of Christianity.
Decisions about the organization and
movement of a
theological course
of study are, I suggest, largely a matter
of prudent judgment by the
theological school itself.
A related aspect
of theological teaching and
studies arises from the fact that theology in practice means in large part relating to young students, which suggests the need to consider the apostolic fruitfulness
of new orders, communities and
movements including World Youth Days.
The following facts support this belief: the participation
of the churches in the
theological conversations
of the ecumenical
movement, which perforce have had to find their common starting point and common vocabulary in biblical literature and theology; the growing body
of specifically biblical theology, produced by the very vitality
of fragmentary and monographic
studies.
It was recognised that in the fields
of Biblical and
theological studies, there had been new insights and developments that needed to be taken seriously by the missionary
movement.
Fox tells the story from beginning to end: childhood in the German - American parsonage; nine grades
of school followed by three years in a denominational «college» that was not yet a college and three year's in Eden Seminary, with graduation at 21; a five - month pastorate due to his father's death; Yale Divinity School, where despite academic probation because he had no accredited degree, he earned the B.D. and M.A.; the Detroit pastorate (1915 - 1918) in which he encountered industrial America and the race problem; his growing reputation as lecturer and writer (especially for The Christian Century); the teaching career at Union
Theological Seminary (1928 - 1960); marriage and family; the landmark books Moral Man and Immoral Society and The Nature and Destiny
of Man; the founding
of the Fellowship
of Socialist Christians and its journal Radical Religion; the gradual move from Socialist to liberal Democratic politics, and from leader
of the Fellowship
of Reconciliation to critic
of pacifism; the break with Charles Clayton Morrison's Christian Century and the inauguration
of Christianity and Crisis; the founding
of the Union for Democratic Action, then later
of Americans for Democratic Action; participation in the ecumenical
movement, especially the Oxford Conference and the Amsterdam Assembly; increasing friendship with government officials and service with George Kennan's policy - planning group in the State Department; the first stroke in 1952 and the subsequent struggles with ill health; retirement from Union in 1960, followed by short appointments at Harvard, at the Center for the
Study of Democratic Institutions, and at Columbia's Institute
of War and Peace
Studies; intense suffering from ill health; and death in Stockbridge, Massachusetts, in 1971.
Fretheim discusses methods for
study of Genesis, stating his own preference for literary
study with an emphasis on «
theological movement» within the texts.
2008 Sonja Weber — Woven Impressions, artThiess Gallery, Munich The Wave — Spell
of the movement, Palatinate Museum, Heidelberg Sky Far, Theological Seminary of the study VELKD, Pullach PURE WATER — Artes element motif of Contemporary Art, Kunstverein Villa Streccius, Landau Of course, LV 1871, Munich Art in Flow — Mariette Haas Gallery, Ingolsta
of the
movement, Palatinate Museum, Heidelberg Sky Far,
Theological Seminary
of the study VELKD, Pullach PURE WATER — Artes element motif of Contemporary Art, Kunstverein Villa Streccius, Landau Of course, LV 1871, Munich Art in Flow — Mariette Haas Gallery, Ingolsta
of the
study VELKD, Pullach PURE WATER — Artes element motif
of Contemporary Art, Kunstverein Villa Streccius, Landau Of course, LV 1871, Munich Art in Flow — Mariette Haas Gallery, Ingolsta
of Contemporary Art, Kunstverein Villa Streccius, Landau
Of course, LV 1871, Munich Art in Flow — Mariette Haas Gallery, Ingolsta
Of course, LV 1871, Munich Art in Flow — Mariette Haas Gallery, Ingolstadt