Sentences with phrase «moves at a good pace»

Moves at a good pace, never tedious.
A great original story with some dedicated actors giving good performances is what keeps this movie moving at a good pace, but due to its lack of laughs and poor CGI the film's grade takes a hit.
Not much, but it's smooth and keeps the film moving at a good pace between action sequences.
Because much of the groundwork for the course was in place, we could move at a good pace in creating the nuts and bolts of the major projects / problems.
Now that we are moving at a better pace, it's time for an update.
The car rides well at moderate speeds, but get it moving at a good pace and it starts to exhibit some bounce over undulating surfaces.
This trip moves at a good pace but still gives you the perfect mix of fun activities and free time — and incredible cuisine, of course.
I won't spoil the story beyond this point but I will say it moves at a good pace, aside from some back tracking sequences and is enjoyable.
The game's narrative moves at a good pace, and it features some fairly robust lore courtesy of fantasy writer Ed Greenwood.
They keep the plot moving at a good pace and give cool background information about the characters in the games.
The graphics are fairly detailed, and the game moves at a good pace.
It moved at a good pace and kept my attention.

Not exact matches

Advances in science and technology move at an insane pace these days — and luckily, many of the great minds leading the charge are using their innovations for good.
Plus, «Brian moves really quickly,» she says, so staying in constant communication is her best bet at «keeping pace with him.»
Federal officials at their most recent meeting saw an economy growing at a strong pace and inflation moving up as well.
If you experience any negative side effects then its best to switch back to the plans method of introducing you to fasting and move at a slower pace.
To start, interest rates are likely to move higher at a slow and moderate pace that could keep bond yields well below historical averages over the next five years, according to the BlackRock Investment Institute (BII).
A good 70 mins but another last 16 exit because we have obvious and longstanding weaknesses such as centre halfs moving at a snails pace... And Walcott has done less than chamberlain
This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits
Ozil playing as the extra CM at times and moving up to play ACM at other times, moving between the lines and now he will have pace around him to make use of his passing range better.
I don't think I'm confusing anything... I think fans tend to hold onto the good times a little too long, but looking at things objectively, these were all good moves by Pace.
Walcott is good at playing on the shoulder of the last man and moving along the line pulling players around, his pace would of forced Reading to play deeper with there defenders and Theo is a much better finnisher compared to Welbeck.
I would develop Henrey after watching him at Blackburn he has the turn of pace and he is hard in the tackle, depending on his wage demands Johnson might be worth a 3 year gamble if Jenkinson is not interested in a full move, but I am sure the new manager will know some good right back from the league they come from, Well apart from the Dutch league with there low grade don't want to end up with a bearded Irish lady
Pirlo is a valid comparison in terms of how he seems to move and flow at his best but his pace is much better than Pirlo's.
Likewise, a positive, gentle pace is contagious too — and will help move everyone in your family toward a better day at work and school.
But even pacing has disadvantages: The team found that two - legged molecules were much better at moving through obstacles than were four - legged ones.
In all four of the heart - pumping routines, you'll move at a fast pace to blend punch sequences with jabs, crosses, hooks and uppercuts, as well as kicks and other footwork.
Even the British NHS, which moves at a pace of a tortoise when it comes to recommending new strategies, says that «The Mediterranean diet has been associated with good health, including a healthier heart».
It's important to approach your journey to health and diet change in steps, not only to give your body a chance to adjust in increments along the way, but also to move at a pace that will better ensure changes you make don't feel so extreme that you get discouraged and stop.
Every relationship is different and moves at different paces, and that's perfectly acceptable, normal, and good.
This can also be challenging at first, as it's a very different style of dating, but it does seem to move things along at a better pace.
It is well understood that you feel online millionaire dating site is not apt for you but it is a high tae that we realize that the world is moving at a fraudulent pace and stopping even to love is difficult.
The episode moves along at a good pace, with only a couple of moments when the timing feels a little too coincidental.
Ritter is so charismatic, and so good at toggling between sarcasm and outright pain, that a lot of this is more watchable than it should be, given the glacial pace at which the plot moves and the amount of time spent on lesser characters and filler stories.
The story here was actually pretty good, but the film moves at an absolute snails pace, felling well longer than 96 minutes.
He keeps things moving at a rollicking pace, incorporates some clever animation, and manages to get good performances from a cast that veries in experiences.
Critics Consensus: Despite the best efforts of its talented leads, The Astronaut's Wife moves at a snail's pace and fails to generate enough intrigue to keep viewers engaged.
Critic Consensus: Despite the best efforts of its talented leads, The Astronaut's Wife moves at a snail's pace and fails to generate enough intrigue to keep viewers engaged.
It is a good show and it moves at a great pace.
In one respect, this works better because now Bourne is free to move at his own pace.
The latest and already the greatest in the fan's eyes, CA: CV moves along at a brisk pace, the effects are fantastic and the superhero line - up is the best we have seen since Avengers Assemble.
The in - game graphics are fantastic, as well as the frame rate which moves at a nice pace.
It's also emblematic of what is best in this slam dunk of an action flick that keeps things moving at a breakneck pace while also being as funny as all get out.
Suspense music can frequently be really very boring, but Desplat keeps things moving along at a good pace.
The rest of the film is fine and moves along at a good enough pace.
The camera capturing this zips along at a good pace, moving left to right in a tracking shot, meaning one side of the image is in constant motion and the other is almost still: an unusual and highly interesting effect.
There are some issues I had with the film such as some of the cinematography not looking as good as it could've been due to the poor lighting, some of the quick cuts in the action scenes were distracting, the movie can drag a little at points and I do think cutting off 15 minutes could've made the pacing move a little more faster (some scenes felt a little rushed too), where the film decides to take its story can be predictable, and some of the green screen was REALLY noticeable.
Burton and his co-director Mike Johnson (an animator on The Nightmare Before Christmas and James and the Giant Peach as well as a director on the short - lived Eddie Murphy TV show «The PJs») keep the film moving at a snappy pace.
That, of course, relates to a chess move — aptly, the gambit — but more importantly it signals the movie is moving ahead at a good pace.
John Wick's David Leitch has since been hired to direct and pre-production sounds to be moving forward at a good pace.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z