EOD makes no difference to equilibrium temperature it only makes a difference in the speed at which the system
moves towards equilibrium.
Both processes are almost imperceptible, as the water inexorably
moves towards equilibrium.
As per my posts above, it is possible for DLR to increase more than evaporation, and so the warming from the DLR beats the cooling from evaporation, leading to a warming whereby the system is
moving towards equilibrium by increasing temperature and hence increasing sensible heat flux and emitted longwave radiation.
To
move towards equilibrium, either R and E increase (R and E being functions of temperature), L increases or all three increase.
The temperature of the Earth will tend to
move towards equilibrium with the forcings, so that the same amount of energy enters and leaves (forget for the moment possible multiple equilibria).
Not exact matches
If it is a new era of faster growth and new investment opportunities, then the
equilibrium real interest rate (the rate at which monetary policy neither boosts nor restrains the economy) would rise, so the central bank would be right to
move interest rates
towards that level.
The political theologian seeking a theoretical basis for social transformation could argue on Hegelian lines, and thereby place the questionable call for social transformation in the context of a
move towards the justice and
equilibrium of the rational State.
The process of such evaporation and then condensation together with those other weather processes is an express route to get heat energy from ocean to surface to atmosphere to space and the bigger the temperature differential between ocean surface, atmosphere and space the faster they must all work to
move the atmosphere back
towards a temperature
equilibrium.
The latter
moving towards a new input - output
equilibrium where the balance is controlled by the atmospheric chemical mix, whereas just dumping heat directly isn't doing that (though if it were a hundred times more than now, one can imagine some territorial / atmospheric side - effects).
However what I do say is that if other factors alter albedo (or any other component of the global energy budget) then the jets will
move in response to that other forcing in order to try to
move back
towards equilibrium between the temperature of the ocean surface and the temperature at the tropopause.
Negative ones
move something back
towards equilibrium.