Once there was a film historian who opined that Wallace Ford was in more
movies than any other character actor of his prominence.
Not exact matches
Other than that acquisitive
movie - mad mindset, it is a pandering, self - flattering mess, featuring unearned catharsis, lazy clichés and
characters presented in broad, sometimes - offensive stereotypes.
Even as
characters are tweaked and actors bring a slightly different energy
than his
other movies, The Best of Me is still the same mushy Nicholas Sparks adaptation with drama so overwrought audience members can't help but laugh — at least until they're sniffling during the closing credits.
The first hour of the
movie is virtually unwatchable, with Braff oddly sprinkling in fantasy sci - fi sequences that are supposed to convey the
character's inner - life, but never really add anything to the film
other than make it feel alternately goofy and pretentious.
While I can understand why people do nt like Michael Cera, I thought he did very well in the role and I was glad to see him playing against type, since
movies like Youth In Revolt have shown that Cera is more
than capable of playing
characters other than the stereotypical nerdy, awkward guy.
For instance, even the humanisation of the villain is less compelling
than Fritz Lang's portrayal of Peter Lorre's
character in M, though an attempt to make him seem ordinary is more evident here
than in
other serial killer
movies like Dahmer (2002).
Out of the ensemble, some eggs are more rotten
than others, but for the most part, Free Fire is a
movie in which we're rooting the
characters to find a solution, not kill each
other.
Wilson has been turning up in too many
movies as the charming, deadpan co-star for us to be charmed anymore, while Murphy must play something
other than that smart - aleck motor - mouth
character if he has to be funny again.
The
movie's shambling, episodic structure ensures that certain sequences fare much better
than others, and it's ultimately clear that Nebraska is at its best when focused on the father / son dynamic between Dern and Forte's respective
characters - with the heartfelt authenticity of such moments generally compensating for the
movie's various deficiencies.
All the
other actors are trying to do their job seriously and trying to portray theirs
characters at least as believable but you can tell that any time Adam, David, Rob, Chris, and Kevin where in a scene together they where just goofing off with each
other rather
than make a
movie.
There are also two female
characters (Ruth Wilson as the Ranger's sister - in - law and Helena Bonham Carter as a one - legged brothel madam) who are here for no apparent reason
other than to keep the
movie from being an all - boys show.
Miller's both incredibly winning at the more upbeat side of the
character (it's a version of the gay best friend archetype we actually recognize from real life, rather
than from
other movies), but sells the broken - heartedness, the step - sibling bond with Watson, and the general sense of being on the wrong side of the cool kids beautifully.
In the 70s, the «day in the life of...» occupation
movies were more the norm as far as comedies went, with an ensemble cast of colorful
characters, and not much plot
other than to watch them all interact and laugh at the results.
Those later elements are really the only thing that sets this apart from the countless
other cop - tracks - down - a-killer
movies out there, because for all its clichéd plot points and stock
characters, it's obvious screenwriters Robert Fyvolent, Mark R. Brinker, and Allison Burnett are more concerned about coming up with graphic death scenes
than anything else.
This
movie is very
character driven, with more
than half the films run time taking place with our main
characters just sitting in detention and talking with each
other.
What makes «Funny Games» different
than any
other campy - scary horror
movie that gets off on tormenting its
characters and teasing its audience?
Packed with cliches, there's nothing remotely original about this East London crime thriller, which seems to be based on
other similar
movies rather
than an original story or
characters.
Boogie Nights contains more great
characters and scenes
than most
movies deliver nowadays, and definitely is worth watching for no
other reason
than to view one of Hollywood's major filmmaking talents in action.
Acclaimed filmmaker Steven Spielberg is all set to helm his first superhero
movie and it is going to be none
other than DC's cinematic adaptation of the comic - book
character Blackhawk.
Though the narrative shares some obvious similarities with the three - act structure of the first
movie, «Catching Fire» is superior in just about every way, including stronger, emotionally - charged performances from Lawrence and Hutcherson and better
character development for the
other tributes, who are more
than just numbers and faces this time around.
There is fine support from Brittany Snow and Anna Camp, landing the kind of jokes that remind you there is more to their
characters than the
other movies perhaps suggested.
Think back to
other movie characters from the «70s — Harry Callahan, Popeye Doyle, Travis Bickle, etc. — and none of them are clean - cut and totally righteous, making them anti-heroes and much more interesting
than traditional «good guys», which is how they would have been defined had this been set in a different era.
Minions explains how they evolved along with
other life on Earth, in a prologue that is actually a better idea for a story about these
characters than the one the
movie ultimately gives us.
We're all familiar with The Bechdel Test, the measure of whether a
movie has at least two female
characters who talk to each
other about something
other than a man.
The
characters are more important elements here
than in any of the
other movies, and that decision by screenwriter Chris Morgan is the screenplay's deadliest fault.
He has become a component of that bigger universe of super-powered
characters, where heroes pop in and out of
other heroes»
movies (mostly during post-credit scenes) for little reason
other than to set up an unstoppable team of superheroes.
And while the cast is wall - to - wall great, what's notable (for genre fans, anyway) is that the title
character is played by none
other than Anya Taylor - Joy, who broke out in this year's hit horror
movie The Witch — only now it looks like she's the one doing the tormenting.
Searchlight will seek to emulate the Sundance - launched success it had in the past with the likes of «Napoleon Dynamite» and «Little Miss Sunshine» —
other movies with quirky and appealing lead
characters — but will need to sell a film that at heart is far more of a quiet drama
than it might appear.
In another standout track, Small Fry's writer / director MacLane shares his influences (a day of fast food research in Portland, working in a ball pit) and the stories behind all of the short's
characters, i.e. the fictitious
movies and TV shows where Neptuna and
others come from (more thought went into that
than you might have guessed).
We recently had a chance to sit down and speak with Dianna Agron about her new film, her
character, and how this
movie will be different
than other aliens films.
While I don't know anything about the
character other than the fact that she is a Russian spy, I am pretty sure these images are going to get a lot of people even more excited about the
movie.
Ryan — the Iron Man
movies are well - equipped to leave you prepped for this film — this film probably incorporates more
characters from that
than any of the
others.
Unlike
other filmmakers with an eye to recreating the past, del Toro puts his
movie love at the service of, rather
than a replacement for, his
characters and his story.
The
movie manages to end on a quasi-hopeful note for two of the
characters, but there's no real sense of happiness
other than the audience simply having survived the ordeal and being able to go on with life.
Nick and Norah's sharp, self - conscious repartee has a snappiness that's closer to the way real suburban teenagers speak
than the baroque one - liners Diablo Cody put in the mouth of Juno (not to mention every
other character in that
movie, appropriate or not).
More like a Guy Ritchie
movie than a Tarantino one, the boys then indulge themselves in a series of wandering conversations, throwing crass jokes around, and having chance encounters with eccentric
characters — all of which turned up knowing each
other and eventually come to a head with a final chase / shootout.
And truth be told, this
character is never much more
than Jack Nicholson in «The Departed,» Jack - lite, just as the
movie lacks the artistry and Scorsese tension to be anything
other than «Son of the Departed.»
It has all the elements of his past
movies, unfortunately this
movie is highly uninteresting and the
characters,
other than those played by Joaquin Phoenix and Josh Brolin, are easily forgettable as they don't have any developing introduction and vanish off the screen as quickly as a Penn and Teller magic trick.
It is a very cool story with a very hilarious Borat - Ozzy type
character... this is just a great
movie and since it's a comedy but achieves so much more... maybe it should win best film awards... I feel excited for the cast but also for the original the room cast... I hope somethings good comes to them
other than just Greg and Tommy...
Probably the greatest superhero
movie ever made that's not based on pre-existing
characters from another medium, and better
than almost every
other superhero
movie, period.
There is a half - baked uprising against WCKD that is only tangentially related to the main
characters and serves little purpose
other than to paint an explosive background to what's meant to be the true emotional stakes of the
movie: Thomas saving his friends.
Mickey Rourke just tattoos people and tells stories instead of fighting, which makes his role essentially pointless, and the
movie doesn't really know what to do with Dolph Lundgren
other than to make his
character crazy, nice, evil, nice and then shove him aside for all of the good stuff.
Phil Lord and Chris Miller (Cloudy with a Chance of Meatballs, The LEGO
Movie) helped put together the story for Sony Columbia's first animated Spidey feature and it includes all sorts of Marvel Comics
characters you won't be seeing in the Spider - Man: Homecoming sequels, and for readers, it stars none
other than fan - favorite Miles Morales!
For the initiated who are somehow invested in these
characters for no reason
other than nostalgia, it may deliver as a lobotomized Happy Meal of a
movie.
Between the upcoming
movie, the
character's 50th anniversary, and the new comic book seriess, there's more talk about Black Panther now
than ever - and these three creators (and «
other Mighty Marvel Guests» according to NYCC) are scheduled to talk about T'Challa, Wakanda, and Black Panther.
There's no justifiable reason for this
movie to be nearly two hours long
other than to cram in as many songs and
characters as possible.
I must say that this was one of the worst
movies I've ever watched, «Evil Dead» was better
than this mound of shit... Gareth Edwards should be banned from directing hence forth, and now I hear he's directing the new Star Wars spin - off... I'm not one to talk down to
others but let's be honest, you have to be retarded to like this
movie... It made absolutely no sense, the script (the most important piece to any
movie) was terrible, the plot was stupid, the acting was horrible and it seemed that the actors who were chosen were acting for a different
movie all together... Where was the sense of urgency, I mean there were 300 foot tall behemoths walking through buildings and all you could show us was who was going ride with the little boy on the school bus... Maybe if all the main
characters died and they just let Godzilla do his thing from there on out an eyebrow could've been raised but unfortunately, there isn't one good thing to say about this
movie... I'm shocked the WB handed over one their biggest names to Legendary Pictures... Let's not forget what they've done with Superman Returns... This is shameful...
«What makes this standout from
other Anderson films (besides having a plot) is that the
characters — particularly the dogs — are much more well - rounded
than the caricatures who you usually parade through his
movies.»
Instead, writer / director Tom Gormican (one of many responsible for the production of «
Movie 43») lets the pieces of the story haphazardly fall where they may, not letting his
characters develop into anything
other than the asses they started as (although Mikey is a decidedly smaller ass
than the
others).
Every
other character — Li - zhen's philandering boss, Chow's happy - go - lucky friend, the nosy landlady («Young wives shouldn't stay out so late — people will start to wonder»)-- is a satellite, and the husband and wife go almost unseen, their offscreen voices used as rhythmic punctuations in a
movie that feels less like a narrative
than a beautifully drawn - out musical improvisation — Wong Kar - wai's «Blue in Green.»