Sentences with phrase «moving into them always»

As more and more games move into always - online multiplayer gameplay, there is some part of us that's expecting Rage to go the same way.

Not exact matches

But that move always turns into the same dialogue.
The move into real estate development is a new one for the Rogers family, whose primary focus has always been in telecommunications.
Marvel, for example, has always developed new comics titles over the years (variety) and successfully moved into movies (diversity) when Disney bought it for $ 4 billion in 2009.
Always take 5 minutes after your meditation to slowly begin moving into the rest of your day.
Maiffret's interest in wired mischief began in 1996, when he was 15 and his mom (always blame the parent) moved him and his two sisters to a subdivision in Orange County, Calif. «As soon as I got a computer, I jumped into hacking big time,» he recalls.
Neometals has always planned to move into downstream processing, given the reputed three-fold increase in value from spodumene concentrate to lithium hydroxide.
Sam, great input (as always), posts like this keep me out of thinking about getting residential real estate into my investment portfolio, instead I focus on retail / industrial properties, however I think I could manage few residential units «on the side», because of lack of diversification I am thinking about buying a triplex at the moment, and I'm convinced that should be the last move and I would not touch the size of my real estate portfolio afterwards, remaining assets are going straight to stocks.
With a new crop of players filtering into Deerfield Beach every year, there's always intense competition with talented youngsters looking to move up the depth chart and knock off established starters.
High - end retailers are buying into Downtown Los Angeles Downtown L.A. hasn't always been known as a shopping destination, but a host of high - end retailers are moving into the area and more space is being built.
We could always move into the property if we needed to.
When this move is made, the whole vocabulary of moral discourse concerning love and other virtues may look the same as it has always done but conceptually it has been fundamentally transformed into something very different.
The Cages and the Falstaffs of the world are least likely to know this, but true - believing Gnostics, an avant - garde elite if there ever was one, have always known it and have always known too how to move into and stake out claims in Christian and Jewish territory.
It's not unusual to have the lamps on for the entire day, moving from a black night to a dark and grey drizzle of a day and back into darkness, always cold, always damp.
Jesus always moves into places moved with grief.
«Here is what is, here is what I want for you, move closer to My purposes» and so we find God out ahead of us, always moving us further into his purposes.
No entity, student or item of fact, can claim completeness, it is always moving into a relationship which defines it somewhat differently.
You follow when I step out to a new place and I know when to slide into your new turn as a shadow and you lead us both through but usually, it's just us, always us, trusting each other's heart for the other, moving seamlessly, together.
But unlike man's experiences which when experienced perish, God's unified feeling is always immediate, never perishing, even as it is always moving forward in a creative advance into novelty.
I believe that God's protection is always there but we have to choose it... It's our responsibility to move ourselves into that space.
When this searching takes place in an atmosphere which does not threaten the person with rejection, no matter what he may disclose; when there is the wisdom and technical knowledge required to help the person to a new interpretation; and above all, when the counselor is able to communicate his own willingness to enter with this person into the new orientation toward which he is moving, there can take place (certainly it does not always happen) a reorganization of the personality.
I cried into my boy's coarse hair (he likes to be held during singing, he likes me to sing into his ears, he's too heavy for this, but I do it anyway) because it was just us always just us, a remnant gathered, singing songs, moving our feet, we'll still be singing and dancing when the evening comes.
We could always make the Falklans Islands the Palestinian Homeland, and move all the Jews into Brooklyn (That is their bomb shelter of sorts)
To say that God is God is to say that he is always active, living, «moving out» to express his nature, rejoicing in every expression of it, tenderly and compassionately entering into relationship with every finite occasion to give it a similar joy in actualizing all that may possibly be available for it, and accepting into himself all that is achieved in the world.
The wisdom of [God's] subjective aim prehends every actuality for what it can be in such a perfected system — its sufferings, its sorrows, its failures, its triumphs, its immediacies of joy — woven by rightness of feeling into the harmony of the universal feeling, which is always immediate, always many, always one, always with novel advance, moving onward and never perishing.
There is always someone else to consider, it is not so easy to find time for yourself and there is a lot of compromising to be done as you bring two people's habits, eccentricities and family traditions into one household, so what is the hurry to move in together?
I also just wanted to thank you for your inspiration; I've always been into healthy eating but struggled to keep it up all the time, but since reading your blog earlier this year my diet (and lifestyle) have moved onto a whole new level and I won't be going back!
This is the way women in my family always cooked okra and their Southern heritage started in Jamestown, moved into South Carolina and Georgia before landing in Florida after the Civil War.
As we move into the coldest months of the year, I always begin craving fresh, crunchy and flavorful foods.
«It's always exciting to add brands to our portfolio, particularly when the new offerings move us into spaces we don't currently play in,» said David Biggar, President of Vintage Point.
I always take time getting into the blogging swing after moving, it's quite stressful.
I was always looking for new ways to eat more green vegetables, plus I had just moved into a house that had a blender, so I decided to give green smoothies a go.
And both are them are always marked by numbers, so its unfair to say that they're having advantage of the space created from their teammates, both of them are just clever of moving into space at the right place and at the right time.
I get your point mate.But in truth Ramsey is the CM and Xhaka is the DM according to our formation anf tactic.It's even debatable if Xhaka is capable of playing DM.I think Ramsey's tactical awareness is poor but he has every right to take risks and move into the opposition box.He's a box to box player.The only problem is Ramsey overdoes it.If we had a proper CDM the team would be more balanced.Now it's like we have two CM's playing in midfield and due to their poor tactical awareness we're always left exposed.I conclude by reminding people that Wilshere is better footballer and is more intelligent than Xhaka.It'll be better playing Wilshere and pairing him with a CDM than having Xhaka play there.He just gets to play over him becausr we signed him for # 35.
On my part the BFG did a decent job for a number of years and there is no doubting his love for Arsenal.He obviously has a mental issue and that is unfortunate.However that will not hide the fact that he will always be respected at our club and when he moves into the coaching role next season I truly hope he is able to provide the Coaching Guidance and Advice to our defenders that Steve Bould has proved totally incapable of doing.
Trevor: The Golden Child always has a way of moving into the mix in majors and his T3 at the Bridgestone bodes well for his chances at Troon.
Giroud is a good player and I do like him but I also recognize that Giroud doesn't move as well as Theo into the channels and as such the box always gets over crowded when the rest of the team try to play as well.
I'll admit to not being Giroud's greatest admirer but I have to admit he is a good striker, But as you have seen starting him in all the games isn't always a good move, for intelligent defences its quite easy to keep him isolated, he is not the most mobile striker on the planet and in those games it would be good to have a versatile, technical striker, one who could interchange with the wingers drop into midfield a Suarez type player.
The A's have always been rumored to be ready to leave, but the odds are much better of them staying, getting a beautiful new ballpark, and making the same transition as the Giants, who moved out of a concrete punchline and into a brick mint.
Always wanted Cesc back, but in the worst case scenario, the smartest move would've been to buy him and loan him out, rather than letting him fall into Maureen's hands.
Anytime we won back possession around our 18 yard box, Santi was almost always there to dribble the ball out and through the first opposition press, by which time his teammates would have moved into position.
In other news, our team seems to be rounding nicely into form, with a productive off - season and several new additions already settling in, there seems to be a renewed sense of confidence in the air... our well - oiled machine has conducted business again early this year, so we can just sit back, kick our feet up and watch all those other suckers scramble to make panic moves in the 11th hour... of course, we need to tie up a few loose ends but our team of savvy negotiators, under the tutelage of our faithful leader, will perform their usual magic with ample time to spare... I have to laugh when I look around the soccer world and see all those teams look upon us with envy and scorn as they struggle to mimic our seemingly infallible business model... thank goodness the powers that be had the foresight and fortitude to resist the temptations of the modern football era... instead of listening to all the experts and simply taking the easy way out by making the necessary improvements on the field and in the front office, we chose the path never traveled... we are truly pioneers in our field... sometimes you just have to have faith in the people that have always conducted themselves in a respectful and honest fashion... most fans aren't so fortunate, they will never know what it's like to follow a team that treats everyone in and around the club as if they were an extended member of the family... all for one I say... so when you wake up this morning, please try not to gloat when you see rival fans pacing back and forth waiting for their respective teams to pull the usual panic buys, just say nothing and be thankful that it isn't you... like I've always said, this is why you stay the course... this is when the real benefits of having someone in charge for over 2 decades really pays off... have a great day fellow Gunners
He always gets into good crossing positions but then he stops and kills the attack, he cuts in or waits and waits until he is closed down, then the move is gone..
That said, we ALWAYS look better when at least 1 midfielder stays wide until the oppurtunity to move inwards presents itself later into the final third.
This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits
When I move back, I am always able to nab one if I'm in the top half of the 2nd (I can't move back into the 20s, they all go).
Trying to thread passes to tightly marked men moving into the space occupied by other defending players is always going to be a thankless task and reflects more poorly on the passer than the runner to the untrained eye.
It's the same old story with AW and the board and always the cheaper option, despite the fact that we COULD actually challenge for trophies next season as other issues have now come into play, Wenger will say «well we would buy Suarez but he's not available, Benzema does not want to leave Real Madrid» ect ect ect, but these are always excuses after the event these players would move if the right offer was made we could have got Higain two seasons ago the attempts at getting Suarez were truly farcical AND Im not convinced that it wasn't done that way so as to make it look like we tried when really we had no intention of paying 40 million for him.
But by mutual consent he's told his agent he wants to leave.The money part will always be a factor even if he decides to sign.If he stays he's just trying to honour his contract and move on for free mostlikely to another club in London.I wish we could know know his final stance before entering into the season because we can't allow him to go for free and strengthen another rival.
It turns the other team into a wall, and we do always make these small one touch moves, tiny.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z