It's not enough to say, «
Moving tar sands from Canada to Texas will cause climate change.»
Based on the initial description of this product, it appears that it could alleviate many of the risks involved with
moving tar sands oil by rail.
Information has continued to pile up confirming many of the concerns raised by NRDC and other environmental groups: pipelines
moving tar sands are more likely to leak, leak detection systems are unlikely to detect tar sands spills when they happen, tar sands spills are significantly more damaging than conventional spills, and conventional spills response measures are inadequate for containing and cleaning tar sands spills.
That leaves Keystone XL as the only viable prospect for
moving tar sands oil into the global market.
«Other options like rail or truck are not feasible for the transportation of large quantities,» said Elizabeth Shope, anti — tar sands advocate with environmental group the Natural Resources Defense Council, in a conference call with reporters, noting that such alternative transportation more than triples the cost of
moving tar sands oil.
He claimed that reliance on railroads to
move tar sands oil meant that less rail capacity was available to transport coal and other things.
He promises to ask Trans - Canada to re-apply for its permit for the rejected Keystone Pipeline, which proposed to
move tar sands oil in massive pipes through the Midwest down to the Gulf Coast, and he supports drilling off the Atlantic coast, which was halted by the Obama Administration earlier this year.
Not exact matches
And in the environmental impact statement, Pilgrim officials wrote: «While crude oil shipment downriver is a relatively recent phenomena on the Hudson River, the increasing production of crude in North America because of fracking, and Canadian
tar sands, is likely to result in increasing demand to
move the crude oil to coastal areas for shipment to refineries.
In a surprise
move, the president also weighed in on the controversial Keystone XL pipeline, planned to transport oil from Canada's
tar sands to refineries on the Gulf of Mexico — suggesting that it will go ahead only if it causes no increase in carbon emissions.
The
tar -
sands oil — essentially diluted bitumen — is more acidic than regular oil and contains more sediment and
moves at higher pressures.
But it's important to understand that Canada is going to be
moving forward with
tar sands, regardless of what we do.
Kinder Morgan spent six years navigating the Canadian bureaucracy to win approval to expand its Trans Mountain pipeline to
move crude from the
tar sands of Alberta to ports on the Pacific Coast of British Columbia.
Landscapes will continue to suffer as we
move to more
tar sands, oil shales, etc..
The real goal of the pipeline is to
move tar -
sands - derived bitumen from the Midwest, where it is currently backed - up, to Gulf Coast refineries.
These groups have either already
moved organizational money out of banks that finance DAPL and / or other
tar sands pipelines, or are in the process of doing so.
«Folks made it known that Vermonters, and our friends from the Northeast, oppose the proposed
tar sands pipeline, and that this project will face a concerted and stiff local resistance if and when big oil decides to try and
move it forward,» said David Vandeusen, conservation organizer for the Vermont Sierra Club.
[Translate] Today, nearly six years after the fight over the Keystone XL
tar sands pipeline
moved into high gear, Donald Trump...
It's time for America's corporations to step up to the plate, say no to
tar sands, and
move beyond oil.
The [
tar -
sands] alternatives aren't perfect, but they
move us in a direction that I like from a jobs - creation standpoint and from a national - security standpoint.
Oil and gas major ExxonMobil said new reserves in the Arctic and Canadian
tar sands must be exploited,
moves scientists deem incompatibe with tackling global warming.
«What the long term looks like [for
tar sands] really depends on whether we
move to address climate change or whether we adopt failure,» said Anthony Swift, director of the Canada project at the Natural Resources Defense Council.
The pipeline will not be
moving «average» oil, of course, but rather
tar sands oil, which is especially dirty and carbon intensive.
«What the long term looks like [for
tar sands] really depends on whether we
move to address climate change or whether we adopt failure,» said
The Alberta
tar sands is taking another hit as two major retailers — Whole Foods and Bed Bath & Beyond — announced on Wednesday that they are
moving to avoid using the petroleum products sourced from the
tar sands for transporting product, according to a ForestEthics press release.
This means it could be coal, oil shale,
tar sands, nukes or renewables, and if you want to
move into fantasy land, fusion.
But it's important to understand that Canada is going to be
moving forward with
tar sands, regardless of what we do.
Now that we do know, it's imperative that we
move quickly to alternate forms of energy — and that we leave the
tar sands in the ground.
Exactly what a «climate leadership position» looks like for the
tar sands industry is beyond me at this point, but I am glad to see that the oil companies are not getting in the way of
moving things forward.
Current alternatives to the Keystone XL for transporting
tar sands oil are on a much smaller scale, in much earlier stages of development, and in many cases face such significant opposition that they are unlikely to
move ahead in the next five to 10 years if at all.»
Indigenous leaders and supporters will meet at Kwekwecnewtxw — the Watch House and
move towards Kinder Morgan's construction zone where many may choose to take action in opposition to the proposed
tar sands pipeline and tanker project.
The other pipeline would
move 193,000 barrels a day of condensate, which is used to dilute
tar sands bitumen so it can flow through the pipelines, to Alberta.
Even planting in earlier clear - cuts did not
move me like seeing what was happening on the
tar sands.