Sentences with phrase «mpg fuel economy figure»

That it can achieve those figures and still offer the best economy in the petrol line - up - with a 60.1 mpg fuel economy figure and emissions of 109g / km - is pretty extraordinary.

Not exact matches

Though exact numbers aren't out yet, Volvo has at least confirmed its new T8 twin - engine plug - in hybrid powertrain will be available — it develops 395bhp in the XC90 with a 0 - 60 time of 5.6 seconds and a combined fuel economy figure of 112.9 mpg.

With only six forward speeds, the Jaguar falls short of the Infiniti's highway fuel economy by 2 mpg but matches its city figure.

That ups the headline power and torque figures to 335bhp and 332 lb ft, but reduces emissions and improves fuel economy to 149g / km and 44.1 mpg, supposedly giving you the best of both worlds in terms of performance and parsimony.

MPG and running costs > Audi claims a combined fuel economy figure of 40.4 mpg and 162g / km of CO2 for the S - tronic.

On a side trip into and around Denver, a pleasant mix of freeway, city, and suburban driving, observed fuel economy exactly matched the F - 150 diesel's EPA combined figure of 25 mpg.

The 2016 Chevrolet Malibu is powered by a 196 - horsepower / 2.5 - liter four - cylinder engine mated to a six - speed automatic transmission; its standard auto start - stop feature helps the five - passenger Malibu Limited midsize sedan in 1LS trim achieve fuel economy figures of 24 mpg city, 34 mpg highway, 28.6 mpg combined.

EPA - estimated fuel economy figures are best for 3.8 RWD models, which are rated 18/28/22 mpg city / highway / combined.

The crossover still manages to improve upon its previous fuel economy figures, although the increase is fairly small: the all - wheel - drive model sees the most significant increase with a combined rating of 22 mpg, up from 19 mpg.

Fuel economy figures for the A7 Competition are 21/29/24 mpg city / highway / combined on recommended premium gasoline.

Based on European figures, I estimate EPA fuel economy numbers for the 2016 Ford Focus RS will fall somewhere around 21 mpg city, 29 mpg highway, and 23 mpg combined, versus 23/32/26 mpg for the Focus ST.

The change helps improve fuel economy, and the highway figure on manual models rises 3 mpg to a respectable 30 mpg.

The official combined fuel economy figure for the Up GTI is 58.9 mpg, but during our test, where we covered over 100 miles and spent nearly five hours behind the wheel, we averaged just over half that, with 31mpg.

Fuel economy figures for the Turbo are 15 mpg city and 23 mph highway.

In marketing and advertising, it was reported to achieve better fuel economy than its chief marketplace rival, the Toyota Prius V, which got 44 mpg city and 40 mpg highway, for a combined figure of 42 mpg.

Infiniti's hybrid powertrain from the M sedan, consisting of a 3.5 - liter V - 6 and a lithium - ion battery pack, is newly available in the Q50 Hybrid, which boasts city / highway / combined EPA fuel economy figures of 29/36/31 mpg, as compared with the standard car's 20/30/23 mpg.

Looking at the combined mileage figures, the RAV4's 25 mpg fuel economy beats the four - cylinder, AWD Equinox (23 mpg), but it trails AWD versions of the CR - V (27 mpg) and Rogue (28 mpg).

Lexus quotes 0 - to - 60 times of 5.8 seconds and 14.3 seconds in the quarter mile and respectable fuel economy figures of 19 mpg / 28 mph (city / highway) in the rear - wheel RC 350.

The standard 192 - horsepower 1.5 - liter engine offers strong off - the - line performance and acceptable levels of power for passing and merging, but the biggest advantage is its class - leading 33 - mpg combined fuel - economy figure.

Indeed, the most frugal 208 — the 74bhp BlueHDi — has class - leading CO2 emissions of just 79g / km and has an amazing official average fuel economy figure of 94.2 mpg.

EPA fuel economy figures are 15 mpg city and 21 mpg highway, but we came in at 17.6 mpg after driving a mix of roads.

Admittedly, it's not like the engine buckles under the Nissan Sentra's weight every time you apply pressure to the gas pedal, and the 1.8 - liter unit does admittedly return some very good fuel economy figures (automatic models return 29mpg in the city and 37mpg on the highway; versions with a manual transmission are two mpg less frugal in both instances).

Fuel economy figures aren't available for the 4 - cylinder yet, but they are expected to beat the V6's best of 25 mpg on the highway.

The goal here is fuel economy, and while complete figures have not been released, the automaker expects the car to squeeze out 35 mpg combined — 3 mpg better than the previous model.

Being a relatively lightweight car with pretty efficient engines should make the MX - 5 cheap to run; during our real - world fuel economy test, the range - topping 2.0 - litre unit returned an incredible 47.9 mpg (up 7mpg on Mazda's official claimed figure).

The 640i's cheaper purchase price might tempt you, but it emits 179g / km of CO2 on 18in wheels and can only manage an official fuel economy figure of 36.7 mpg.

Stick to SE spec with 18in wheels and it'll emit a respectable 149g / km of CO2 and the official combined fuel economy figure is 50.4 mpg.

It's worth avoiding the six - speed automatic if you're worried about fuel economy, too — it drops that combined mpg figure down to 36.2 mpg and emits 204g / km of CO2.

The 237bhp diesel, badged 25d, brings a disappointingly large drop in claimed fuel economy figures, only managing 53.3 mpg combined as a rear - wheel drive car and emitting 129g / km.

I made a quick day trip down to Mid-Ohio Sports Car Course from Detroit and was returning fuel economy in the 13 mpg range, which matches the combined EPA fuel economy figure.

Final fuel economy figures weren't released, but the 2016 2.4 - liter achieved 26 miles per gallon in the city and 33 mpg on the highway in front - wheel - drive trim (25/31 with AWD).

Ironically, the diesel and the hybrid trims earn about the same fuel economy figures, neither of which punch much past 30 mpg.

Fuel economy is good, but nowhere near the claimed 69 mpg combined figure.

Official fuel economy figures for the standard M4 stand at 32.1 mpg, with CO2 emissions coming in at 204g / km; the CS produces 33.6 mpg and 197g / km of CO2 and the high - performance M4 GTS emits 199g / km of CO2 and returns 34mpg, but it's unlikely you'll ever achieve if you're driving it in the way it was intended.

Next year's model is lighter, but 2017 also brings revised adjustments to stated fuel economy figures — so expect some increase in real - world mpg, even if the window sticker number is different.

The automaker disclosed that the all - wheel - drive versions of all three crossovers should have displayed fuel economy figures of 15 mpg in the city and 22 mpg on the highway, for a combined rating of 17 mpg.

The most economical non-electrified Countryman is, unsurprisingly, the Cooper D. Its claimed fuel economy figure of 65.7 mpg is very good; especially given the slower Audi Q2 1.6 TDI only manages 64.2 mpg.

Performance & Economy 0 - 60 mph in 5.1 secs (0 - 100 km / h in 5.3 s) 0 - 100 mph in 11.6 secs (0 - 160 km / h in 11.5 s) Max Speed: 184 mph (296 km / h) Economy: 16.7 mpg (16.9 l / 100 km) Combined EU Cycle (figures are provisional and subject to Type Approval) US EPA Cycle (fuel consumption figures will be advised following Certification) CO2 emission: 393 g / km (figure is provisional and subject to Type Approval)

Aside from these being stellar figures for cars its size and weight in relation to the engine displacement, perhaps the most notable fact about the 328d's fuel economy is that it actually bests its ActiveHybrid 3 stablemate, which managed only 33 mpg highway while stickering out at a little more than $ 50,000.

The combined fuel economy figures range from 17 mpg to 13 mpg.

It delivers a claimed combined fuel economy figure of 43.5 mpg with a CO2 output of 171g / km but will still propel the newly lightened Discovery to 60mph from rest in a brisk 8.0 sec.

Go for the 17 - inch alloys and that combined fuel economy figure drops to 80.7 mpg and it's 101g / km for emissions of CO2, but the diesel is still the model to go for if low running costs are a big priority.

A budget - pleasing feature is that once you ease off at cruising speed, the 300C's computer shuts off four of the hemi's eight cylinders to improve fuel economy (the EPA figures are 17 miles per gallon regular unleaded city and 25 mpg highway).

Fuel economy is much more impressive in the cheaper GS 300h, returning a claimed 64.2 mpg, while the GS 450h should return up to 46.3 mpg, although in truth we struggled to get more than 40mpg, let alone match the official figure of the GS 450h F Sport.

Lincoln cites EPA - estimated fuel economy figures of 16 mpg city and 22 mpg highway, for a combined 18 mpg rating in 4x2 form with this new powerplant, which will surely be appreciated by owners no matter how low gasoline prices go.

The key ingredient for fuel misers is that the hybrid setup delivers better economy than the 3.0 litre diesel — official figures 44.1 mpg of compared to 37.7 mpg for the regular diesel, but manages to offer power and torque figures comparable to the 4.4 litre V8 diesel.

Oh, and EPA fuel economy figures are a little better at 20 mpg in the city and 28 mpg on the highway, compared to 18 city and 27 highway for the SH - AWD.

[17] Car and Driver recorded another 18 mpg ‑ US (13 L / 100 km; 22 mpg ‑ imp) figure and noted its»... fuel economy that won't live up to the 22 mpg ‑ US (11 L / 100 km; 26 mpg ‑ imp) / 32 mpg ‑ US (7.4 L / 100 km; 38 mpg ‑ imp) EPA ratings in real - world use...».

However, due to a recalculation of how the company calculates fuel economy, the Genesis Coupe sees its EPA city / highway ratings fall by 2 to 3 mpg, leaving some rather dismal fuel - economy figures especially when compared to rivals like the Ford Mustang and Dodge Challenger.

The official (weighted combined) CO2 emissions figure is just 49 g / km and the test fuel economy is quoted at 134.5 mpg.