During my testing, I averaged 18.3
mpg over a cycle that mostly consisted of casually - paced freeway cruising while enjoying the quiet cabin and the clear Bose audio system.
Not exact matches
The new 991 Turbo averages 29
mpg on the European driving
cycle, which seems very impressive, since this represents a 16 percent improvement
over the previous 997 Turbo.
Looking at the numbers; Saving 10 - percent on fuel for a vehicle that gets only 8
mpg over a yearly driving
cycle of 40,000 miles is almost eight times more valuable than increasing the fuel economy of a vehicle getting 30
mpg that is driven only 20,000 miles per year.
Mercedes - Benz claims the E 220 d averages as low as 3.9 l / 100 km (60.3
mpg US) and 102 g / km CO2
over a combined
cycle, but I found that impossible to achieve in the real world.
This is a surprisingly pleasant hybrid system that delivers more than acceptable acceleration — with a 0 to 62mph time rated at 8.7 seconds — and strong fuel economy: the equivalent of just
over 28 imperial
mpg on the US EPA's city test
cycle, and better than 42
mpg on its highway
cycle.
The Civic hybrid, with a larger 1.5 - liter i - VTEC engine that produces 90 horsepower and 97 pound - feet of torque [14] and a lithium - ion battery, is rated at 44
mpg ‑ US (5.3 L / 100 km; 53
mpg ‑ imp) in combined city and highway EPA test
cycle, an improvement of 3
mpg ‑ US (3.6
mpg ‑ imp)
over the previous generation hybrid.
Combining the N20 with BMW's familiar EfficientDynamics package - brake - energy regeneration, stop / start and an on - demand water pump — results in a 16 percent improvement
over the inline - six in the combined European consumption
cycle at 29.8
mpg (U.S.).
So equipped, Porsche claims combined -
cycle fuel consumption of 30.5
mpg for the Boxster and 29.4
mpg for the Boxster S — improvements of about 15 percent
over the old model.
Fuel economy exceeds 27 km / L (3.7 L / 100 km, 63.5
mpg US) WMTC (World Motorcycle Test
Cycle) mode by Honda's calculation and achieves an approximate 40 % improvement
over other sports models in its class.
Over my mixed driving
cycle, which included a bit of sporty driving, I averaged just 25
mpg.
In Mercedes - Benz's official papers, the C200 4Matic averages as low as 6.1 l / 100 km (38.5
mpg US)
over the European combined
cycle, but we all know lab fuel economy tests have nothing to do with real life.
This engine also achieves 68.9
mpg on a combined
cycle, which isn't that impressive compared to the A-Class or BMW 1 Series, both producing
over 80
mpg from engines of similar performance.
However during our leadfooted testing, we only managed 13.7
mpg over a mixed city and highway
cycle.
Fuel economy
over the combined
cycle is 10.5 l / 100kms (26.9
mpg) while the Coupé has a CO2 figure of 249 g / km.
Its 2.0 - litre engine achieves a claimed 34.0
mpg on a combined
cycle, which isn't too bad considering the performance on offer - but the rival SEAT Leon Cupra manages
over 42
mpg.
We averaged 21.7
mpg over a combined
cycle of about 130 miles of city / highway driving and about 100 miles of pretty severe mountain - road flogging.
We managed 19.8
mpg over our combined testing
cycle that heavily favored city driving, but as you'll soon learn that's because having fun in the Beetle requires a heavy right foot.
It's claimed to use 13.3 l / 100 km or around 17.7
mpg US on the combined
cycle, and you should see it dip below 10 l / 100 km (
over 24
mpg US).
It's a significant improvement
over the 2017 model, which achieved a max of 18
mpg on the combined
cycle.
The best Navara for fuel economy is the 2WD King - Cab with a 46.3
mpg combined
cycle showing, but you could throw a blanket
over the whole range as even the 4x4 Double - Cab with the dCi 190 (187bhp) engine manages 44.8
mpg and 167g / km of CO2.