These ratings are based primarily on performance in 40
mph crash tests conducted by IIHS.
Four of the five midsize SUVs recently tested allowed excessive damage in a series of 5
mph crash tests.
Seven new cars turned in varying performances in 5
mph crash tests to assess how well their bumpers prevent costly damage in parking lot - type impacts.
The Institute conducted repeated 30
mph crash tests with child restraints and found that most don't need to be thrown out after a crash.
WASHINGTON — Consumers shouldn't get the idea that sport - utilities are unsafe or «flimsy» based on the highly publicized results of 5 -
mph crash tests conducted by the insurance industry, an auto industry official said.
In 5 -
mph crash tests by the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety on six 1999 sport - utilities, damage ranged from about $ 2,900 on a Mercedes - Benz ML320 to more than $ 6,200 on a Mitsubishi Montero Sport.
The institute, the insurance industry's research arm, said in a recent study that it tallied damages as high as $ 4,361 after conducting 5 -
mph crash tests on five small pickups.
The Institute's 5
mph crash tests assess bumper performance in the kinds of minor impacts that frequently occur in commuter traffic and parking lots.
The federal government has been testing new passenger vehicles in 35
mph crash tests since 1978.
An aftermarket device that attaches to the sides of a tractor - trailer successfully prevented a midsize car from sliding underneath the trailer in a 40
mph crash test conducted by IIHS.
When the Kia Sedona hit the barrier in a 5
mph crash test, the airbags deployed.
The 2003 Infiniti Q45 is a successor to the 1997 Q45 design that was a marginal performer in the Institute's 40
mph crash test.
Not exact matches
Dynamic Crash
Tests (Frontal Impact) As required by FMVSS 213, car seats must meet certain specifications when subjected to frontal impact sled tests simulating crashes at 30
Tests (Frontal Impact) As required by FMVSS 213, car seats must meet certain specifications when subjected to frontal impact sled
tests simulating crashes at 30
tests simulating
crashes at 30
mph.
Rear facing
crash test at 35
mph (50 km / h) of a Britax Two - Way (ugly colors I know: — RRB --RRB-.
We can stage
crashes equivalent to 85 km / h (53
mph) in the car - much higher than the European Safety Regulations of 30
mph or ADAC
crash tests at 40
mph.
We stage
crashes equivalent to 85 km / h (53
mph) in the car - much higher than the European Safety Regulations of 30
mph or ADAC
crash tests at 40
mph.
The new body structure is 25 percent stiffer than the old E46 3 - series, the main goal being to enhance
crash performance, particularly in the new federal 50 -
mph, rear - end offset
crash and the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety side - impact
test.
IIHS says the Q7's optional pre-collision braking system fully avoided a
crash during a 12 -
mph test; in the 25 -
mph test, the Q7 slowed to just 2
mph before impact.
The group then ran
crash testing on each pair, allowing them to collide against one another at 10
mph.
The new small overlap frontal
crash test, designed to simulate what would happen when the front corner of a car collides with another vehicle or object, constitutes the front end of the driver's side striking a five - foot tall rigid barrier at 40
mph.
The frontal
crash test crashes the vehicle into a fixed barrier at 35 miles per hour, and the side
crash plows a 3,015 lb barrier moving at 38.5
mph into a standing vehicle.
To give you the perfect blend of adventure and safety, it passed its IIHS» front
crash prevention and mitigation
test in the results of which it reduced a 25 -
mph impact by 5
mph and a 12 -
mph impact by 1
mph, receiving an advanced rating.
The new
test will augment the agency's existing frontal
test, which
crashes a car at 40
mph against a deformable barrier that overlaps 40 % of the front.
The Sept. 9, 2009,
crash featured a 1959 Chevrolet Bel Air versus a 2009 Chevrolet Malibu in a moderate overlap front
test at 40
mph.
The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety has evaluated the crashworthiness of a Maxima with the structural and airbag modifications in a 40
mph frontal offset
crash test into a deformable barrier.
The MKX managed to avoid an imminent collision by itself at both 12
mph and 25
mph, the two
tests that are run to determine the effectiveness of the
crash prevention.
A Volt that underwent a 20
mph side - impact
crash test caught on fire several weeks later, causing the Volt as...
In IIHS track
tests at 12
mph and 25
mph, a Sedona equipped with the new front
crash prevention system avoided collisions.
Comparison of Mitsubishi Galant models: 1995, 1999, 2004 Measured intrusion (cm) in 40
mph frontal offset
crash tests
For eight years the Institute has been providing comparative rankings of passenger vehicles based on performance in frontal offset
crash tests at 40
mph.
Each vehicle's overall side evaluation is based on performance in a
crash test in which the side of the vehicle is struck by a barrier moving at 31
mph.
The Institute ran
crash tests at 10
mph with the new F - 150 crew cab and its 2014 steel - bodied predecessor.
The
test simulates a rear - end
crash with a velocity change of 10
mph, approximately equivalent to a stationary vehicle being struck at 20
mph by a vehicle of the same weight.
The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety has evaluated the crashworthiness of a 1999 ML 320 with the structural changes in a 40
mph frontal offset
crash test into a deformable barrier.
Each
test simulates an intersection
crash in which a striking vehicle moving at 30
mph, represented by the barrier, hits the driver side of a vehicle going 15
mph.
The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety has evaluated the crashworthiness of a GS 400 with the structural changes in a 40
mph frontal offset
crash test into a deformable barrier.
In addition, the Hyundai Tucson's front
crash prevention system was given six points by the IIHS and its automatic braking system allowed the Tucson to circumvent accidents in the 12
mph and 25
mph tests.
The vehicle avoided a
crash in the 12
mph IIHS track
test.
The side evaluation is based on performance in a
crash test in which the side of a vehicle is struck by a barrier moving at 31
mph.
The Institute's frontal crashworthiness evaluation is based on results of a 40
mph frontal offset
crash test.
The Institute rates vehicles as basic, advanced or superior for front
crash prevention depending on whether they offer autobrake and, if so, how effective it is in
tests at 12 and 25
mph.
The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety has evaluated the crashworthiness of the CTS in two 40
mph frontal offset
crash tests into deformable barriers.
When put to the
test, the Continental frontal
crash system was able to avoid collision at both 12 And 25
mph.
The Lincoln Continental's optional front
crash prevention system earns a superior rating, and when equipped with the system, the sedan avoided collisions in IIHS track
tests at 12
mph and 25
mph.
The
test differs from the U.S. government's frontal
crash test, in which a car strikes a rigid barrier head - on at 35
mph.
In this evaluation, vehicles were
tested in a frontal
crash at 40
mph (64 km / h) and in a side
crash at 31
mph (50 km / h) with a movable barrier shaped like the front end of an SUV.
It's similar to the
crash tests where the driver's side hits a barrier at 40
mph.
The Institute rates models with optional or standard front
crash prevention systems as superior, advanced or basic depending on whether they offer autonomous braking, or autobrake, and, if so, how effective it is in
tests at 12 and 25
mph.
The Institute's crashworthiness evaluations are based primarily on results of the frontal offset
crash test at 40
mph.
In NHTSA's frontal
test, passenger vehicles
crash at 35
mph into a rigid barrier covering the full width of the vehicle.