Sentences with phrase «much i risk seems»

However, in some of them calculating the expected return is fairly simple, but evaluating how much I risk seems more complicated.

Not exact matches

Anything that takes too much time, requires repetition, or seems to serve only your interests is a risk to your business.
What caused so much panic wasn't plummeting share prices; it was the mess underneath the mess: complex packages of high - risk mortgage securities that had been sold and resold, hedged, leveraged, and partitioned into untold numbers of pieces — and which in a momentary flash of Wall Street realism, now seemed to have little (or unknowable) worth.
It seems to me that if the above steps are followed, and a culture of risk management and tone - at - the - top is set by the board, it's much less likely that «we missed it» will occur.
It might seem encouraging to applaud your child's intelligence, but tons of research — much of it spearheaded by Stanford psychologist Carol Dweck — shows that doing so makes kids fearful of taking risks or pursuing tough goals that might make them feel less than brilliant at first.
Cultures and retail propositions at SBRY & Asda are very different and therefore the execution risk seems much higher than the smooth Ahold - Delhaize merger.»
So it seems to me the risk of the economy hitting the recession when monetary policy is not in a position to respond are much greater than they have been previously and therefore, we need to be very cautious about doing anything that would increase those risks.
But as long as the PBoC can continue to withstand pressure to lower interest rates — and it seems that the traditional poor relations between the PBoC and the CBRC have gotten worse in recent months, perhaps in part because the PBoC seems more determined to reduce financial risk and more willing to accept lower growth as the cost — China will move towards a system that uses capital much more efficiently and productively, and much of the tremendous waste that now occurs will gradually disappear.
It seems like much of the retirement planning advice out there focuses on distribution rates, the percentage of income to replace, asset allocation changes or a determination of how much risk is suitable for a retiree's portfolio without ever considering actual living expenses or spending needs.
No other blockchain - based software initiative seems to be at any real risk of hockey - sticking into general recognition, much less general usage.
On balance the risks of raising rates seem a little more likely to play out and much more serious than the risks of standing still on rates.
It seems to me to be far better risk / reward to put much more into Emerging (not just BRICs — all of them) and REITs in particular.
On the other hand, seems like your risk of uncertainty is much greater.
I like Wilshire and his mentality but after years of having bet our hopes on players who were not available as a result of frequent and prolonged injury, it seems too much of a risk IMO to build around Wilshire at this point.
Obviously Arsenal are only looking for a backup to the in - form Coquelin, but no matter what his previous reputation has been, it seems to be a risk to pay that much for a player unproven in the Premier League.
It seems like a pretty starightforward choice for the manager to make and one that is based on how much risk he is willing to take to ensure Arsenal record our first EPL win of the season.
But, when you see guys go down, it seems unnecessary because you put them at a much higher risk with such a quick turnaround.»
Time will tell if he leaves as Tottenham can't risk losing too much depth with no players coming in, but the # 20m demands do seem a bit optimistic for a player who has made just 14 Premier League appearances in the last two years.
We are sorry if we seem ungrateful sometimes Admin, you are really doing a GREAT job making me especially happy and i don't know about any other person cause i might not comment very often but i visit this site every single day of my life to read comments from everyone and it really makes my day... So thank you very much and nevertheless, i personally am tired of reading articles of Alexis Sanchez now... I must admit i personally thought Sanchez was holding Arsenal to ransom before, until Wenger came out to say he has never asked for a transfer request and i think the club has made there intentions known that they don't want to sell him, not even to a title rival and i think that is why city are now going after mbappe, seems they are desperately in need of a striker and if they are that desperate they should fork out 80m for Sanchez if they really need him, I LIKE THE RISK ARSENAL IS TAKING AS REGARDS SANCHEZ..
Does not seem to have recovered from his serious knee injury so I would pass on him — too much of a risk.
For all of Romos faults the guy had the balls to take a lot of calculated risks, he got burned a lot by it but he created much more good than bad when he did it... It seems like the Cowboys got scarred by all the late game INTs Romo would throw when trying to come back then vastly overcorrected to a guy who takes damn near 0 risks.
The issue for Arsenal now seems to be whether we view Sterling as damaged goods, too much of a risk or simply not good enough to spend a big transfer fee on, because the Daily Star has reported that the Gunners are the club he wants to play for.
He seems to think it too much of a risk at the moment to play with his army of wingers, with Mirallas barely getting a sniff since signing his new contract.
However, statistics like these don't so much show the risk between homebirth and hospital so much as they show the risk between horribly incompetent providers vs. ones who know what they are doing, and unfortunately homebirth nearly always seems to come with the former sort.
Formula tends to be higher in protein, and while that may seem like a good thing, too much protein can also increase the risk of childhood obesity.
What I seem to gather is this: 1) The absolute risk of death from home birth is LOW, which is why homebirth advocates say that this study proves homebirth is «safe», however: 2) Compared to HOSPITAL births, the rate of death for homebirth is MUCH higher, and 3) The midwives reporting did so on a voluntary basis, so this isn't a study that is worth very much anyMUCH higher, and 3) The midwives reporting did so on a voluntary basis, so this isn't a study that is worth very much anymuch anyway.
(Special Delivery from Hawaii) I went with them over other hammock companies as they had incline issues, pad inserts and thick fabrics that seemed like too much a risk.
Their idea seemed so wild that I actually asked Shawna C. Willey, my breast surgeon at MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, who said, «The goal of risk - reducing surgery is to remove as much breast tissue as possible,» adding, «There should be no milk production.»
It seems to me that some «traditional egalitarians» risk missing a really important point the public's belief in «fair inequality» ends up around the 10 - 1 and 15 - 1 income differentials - ie much much less unequal - though they are also just interested in how the much larger differentials come about as about their scale.
The latter two are risk assessments which will have a much greater impact on your life than Brexit and people seem to make them just fine while only occasionally having nervous breakdowns.
Cameron's own position doesn't seem to be under much risk as a result of the EU elections or the Scottish referendum.
But the odds are that the risk - averse GOP, which has plenty of other races to worry about an invest in, is not going to waste much time on a candidate who lost the primary and is now in a four - way race that seems — on its face, at least — to be a losing proposition.
Issel may be promising not to use (or failing to «envision») public money for acquiring an NBA team, but Kentucky economic development secretary Terry Gill seems to have a better imagination, telling the Courier Journal: «I think the state and local government, we certainly have a role to play but we should not be burdened with too much of that risk
Larger increases are rare, and there's always a risk that if you seek too much, it can make you seem out of touch or too focused on the rewards and not enough on the work required to get there.
For example, researchers reported in a much touted 2006 Science article that they had discovered a gene variant that seemed to confer a risk for obesity, and they replicated the results in four human populations.
Being part of a «sand mafia» can seem attractive because it is a low - risk, high - profit enterprise that doesn't require much specialist equipment.
When it comes to the risk of developing diabetes and cardiovascular diseases, it seems more important where in the body the fat is stored than how much fat the body has.
Guard against ovarian woes When Australian researchers recently compared women with ovarian cancer to cancer - free women, they found that roughly one glass of wine a day seemed to reduce the risk of the disease by as much as 50 percent.
«Reading or doing homework does nt seem to be associated with risk factors as much as television viewing,» says Katzmarzyk, who was not involved in the study but has studied the health effects of sitting time.
Drinking too much milk (or having a high calcium intake) seems to increase prostate cancer risk.
A pound or two a year may not seem like much at first, but over the years, the weight can add up, and you can run the risk of becoming overweight or obese.
Seems to me that the risks are probably much higher these days for children due to all the sweets, fruit juices, fruit snacks and etc. handed out to very young children at daycares, churches, school parties, and etc..
That is at least a little calming:) although the 60 grams of flax seed seem to be hole seeds that (at least as I understands it) passes pretty much right through the body it may not say so much about the risk of ground seeds?
Seems the study indicates much lower risk if dosage below 20 mg.
This seems to be a «sweet spot» for most people for maximizing results without adding too much additional stress on the body (which increases the risk of overtraining).
With my increased carbs (and even sugar), I definitely wondered if I was risking GD, but I just had my test two weeks ago and my results were phenomenal, which impressed me that even with essentially a much higher carb diet, my blood sugar regulation is still awesome, and I'm sure you'll be the same way from what it seems.
The problem is while lean as I am in general it seems that 80 % of most visible body fat seems to be concentrated around my gut and really throws off my physique in general, is there a way I can burn this fat off with cardio withput modifying my diet too much and risk diminishing this rate of hypertrophy?
I wore mine to practically every in office meeting I attended this summer - they made getting dressed in the morning so much easier at a time when all of my summer dresses seemed only semi-office-appropriate and I risked spending the day feeling uncomfortable.
At $ 30 it didn't seem like much of a risk, and have I mentioned how delightful Beautylish is?
If you don't write enough, you risk sounding like you didn't read through their profile and have no communication skills, whereas writing too much may seem too overwhelming.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z