Sentences with phrase «much a content consumer»

Not exact matches

Many brands either err too much on the «advertorial» side, where consumers tune out veritable propaganda, or the content is too soft and fails to set up the story to sell - in the product.

In other words, you decided that consumers have the right to not pay for much of my content here at Fortune.

Viacom is trying to get consumers to lobby Dish to continue carrying its content, but Dish CEO Charlie Ergen seems adamant that he wants a much better deal than the one Viacom is currently offering.

The deal is also opposed by an array of consumer groups and smaller television networks on the grounds that it would give AT&T too much power over the content it would distribute to its wireless customers.

Consumers will look for more truth and purpose to companies and the content that's representing them, and will be much wiser to what they are being fed across social platforms, on TV, and from the media outlets they access the most.

Just think about how much easier Jack Erwin's job is after combining multiple content types along a coherent and organized consumer decision journey.

If an entity is «doing content» it seems much less likely that anything they publish will have the genuine connection to consumers that is required to grip and spread.

The deal is opposed by an array of consumer groups and smaller television networks on the grounds that it would give AT&T too much power over the content it would distribute to its wireless customers.

And much more consumer generated content is on the way.

Roger Lynch, CEO of Sling, noted that when the IP - based service launched two years ago, it had a much narrower selection of content and was primarily targeted toward younger consumers who never had pay TV.

But while the percentage of certified content has to be specified on the label, many consumers, roasters, and coffee professionals I've talked to think that the «30 % rule» tarnishes a great certification, confuses or misleads consumers, and indicates too much concession to corporate interests.

American consumers, for their part, have been content to direct much of their Internet use to e-mail and social networks, which operate perfectly well at normal broadband speeds, and they have not been willing to pay a premium for speedier service.

«China is the largest coal consumer in the world, but it burns much lower quality coal, such as brown coal, which has a lower heat value and carbon content compared to the coal burned in the US and Europe,» said Prof Guan.

For many consumers, buying a gallon of milk is much more complex than finding the preferred fat content and expiration date.

When the percentage of the sales owed to content creators on a 1600 msp game is disbursed, Microsoft calculates based on $ 19.99 per copy (the US cost of the points), regardless of how much a consumer paid for the 1600MSP that enabled the purchase.

After thinking about it, I think we have to tell those who control much of the content we watch — the fantasy content creators — that we are increasingly uneasy consumers.

DS: We get some of the traditional audience, but firmly believe we're reaching a much wider range of consumers with our content.

The group's goal was to ensure that as much of their vibrant content as possible was available for the growing numbers of consumers who were using their tablets for personal reading.

While much of the consumer population might still think of Kindles or Nooks when they think of digital reading, the advent of so many practical, day - to - day niches for e-reading has meant a greater demand for electronic and a greater need for companies who serve to convert data and content.

Given that a lot of content creators are very pro-DRM, and a lot of content consumers are anti-DRM, Amazon might not have an option other than to keep the Kindle Store DRM Agnostic (Recently, have been referring to Wikipedia nearly as much as Chris Anderson).

This process has actually been ongoing for quite some time and began with the emergence of tools that digitized the back - end of the business; word processors, computers, design software, email and much more (which changed writing, editing, typesetting, design etc) and has over time moved from there towards more front facing aspects of the industry (production, distribution, selling) before starting to make a large impact on the consumer side of the industry, consumption in the form of ebooks and web - reading (not to mention making many other forms of content from music to games available to those consumers).

Yes, my view of the Fire isn't so much that it's a tablet subsided by content sales as much as it's an Amazon home - sales kiosk subsidized by the consumer.

Instead of supporting» big» vs.» big» I'd much rather support up and coming publishers / content providers that are thinking about initiatives or fresh ideas that are on the forefront of discovering new talent and news to deliver talent to consumers.

It was in their interest to adopt measures that would (theoretically at least) prevent copying of content just as much as it was in the publishers» interest, since that would help keep consumers locked into their respective platforms.

Because those five houses control so much content, Hudson says, the company simply had to get some of those publishers» titles in order to make their offering truly viable for reader - consumers looking to bundle e-editions with their print copies of favorite books.

Unshackle good books from the devices which we use to read / watch / listen to them and we'll consumer much, much more of your liberated content.

«We are struggling to see why a consumer would pay twice as much for a slightly larger tablet but with little content,» writes Windsor.

Are consumers demanding too much content?

While it's correct that consumers are much more likely to find your website on a search engine with commonly used terms, the actual content of your URL is a very important part of search engine optimization.

So much great content released for the platform, and it's clear consumers agree!

Just like the majority right now is going on large sales and bundling to their heart's content, if a majority did business like this the initial revenue would probably stagnate and be much lower than expected, but after the consumers got into their heads that the games they wanted would NOT follow the expected process, revenue would increase and maybe allow for less waste of resources on support (as you say) or channel them to good marketing campaigns that don't hurt either the consumers or the developers.

Shame for players, really — Just Dance is pretty much the only rhythm - action series still doing well, and it would be better for consumers to just release one game and a heck of a lot of DLC content, since all the games pretty much play the same.

It allows consumers to save time, while also being extremely clear as to how much money they are actually spending on content.

We probably put too much content in there, there were comments from consumers that said it felt bloated.

That's made up from a mix of quality, longevity, and personal love for the game — if you enjoy something enough, you'll be sure to want more of it — but sometimes there's just too much there for the regular consumer, and it's becoming increasingly hard to separate the high - quality content from the bloated and tacked - on extras that are sure to follow every game's launch.

At the risk of oversimplifying this, net neutrality is generally favoured by consumers and content providers, but not so much by ISPs.

I am a big - time consumer of content via RSS — so much so that sometimes when I click through to read a post on its website, I realize I had no idea what the website looked like until just then, despite... more»

I am a big - time consumer of content via RSS — so much so that sometimes when I click through to read a post on its website, I realize I had no idea what the website looked like until just then, despite having read its content for years.

The amount of content available to consumers — much of it free of charge, but scattered across thousands of websites — is growing exponentially every day.

Even if you have awesome solutions and expertise to offer, firms of all sizes struggle to pull in modern consumers who want to see relevant content where they spend so much of their time: Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, Yelp, etc..

Having more content sources like YouTube and Amazon Prime, even in HDR - 10, is much more useful to a broader swath of consumers.

Vessel plans to then ask consumers to pay for these videos through a monthly subscription, but also run ads against the content — which is pretty much the same model that Kilar established at Hulu for longer - form TV content.

I understand that developing games isn't cheap and that the «freemium» model has proven itself to be a much more reliable stream of cash in a climate where consumers may be wary of shelling out money for a mobile game in advance — a reason why in - app purchases for unlocking the additional game content or to remove ads has always felt like a fair compromise.

Now, consumers have a choice from among three devices that deliver the same high - quality content in much smaller packages.