Sentences with phrase «much a test for»

Not exact matches

It's so much easier to administer and grade a useless multiple choice test and to inflate every kids» grades for their college applications than it is to create challenging course work that excites, engages, and challenges them.

We've fired it for 100 seconds — it could fire much longer than 100 seconds, that's just the size of the test tanks.

At 1,400 ppm, for instance, the test subjects» performance dropped by 50 percent on average, and in some cases by much more.

For groceries, Walmart is testing a much larger machine with internal freezers and refrigerators.

BMW AG's new U.S. subscription pilot will put drivers into the brand's top performance cars for as much as $ 3,700 a month as the German automaker tests a new ownership model with its most exclusive customers.

When you're down for the count and have nothing to offer anyone, that's a true test of just how much your family and friends love you.

That doesn't tell us how much faster it is than the A9 used by the previous iPad, though, or even the A8X chip used by the iPad Air 2, so we'll have to reserve judgment until we get the new iPad in the lab for testing.

During the test, a sensor on the bit measured how much movement, and pressure might be needed for the unassisted drill bit to obtain rock samples.

From the day it became apparent that Theranos had gone to great lengths to hide serious issues with its blood testing technology, it wasn't hard to predict that things would end badly for the much - hyped $ 9 billion startup and its iconic founder, Elizabeth Holmes.

And in his January 1937 inaugural address Roosevelt said, «The test of our progress is not whether we add more to the abundance of those who have much; it is whether we provide enough for those who have too little.»

That Monday's accident was the first fatal incident involving a fully autonomous vehicle indicates that arguments for their safety have merit, but much of that testing has occurred on highways, which are easier for self - driving cars to navigate than dense, urban environments.

The initiative takes ongoing tests Macy's has been conducting at its «petri dish» of a store in Woodbridge, N.J. — such as mobile checkout in store and new lighting to make shopping more inviting to 50 stores this year — as a launching pad for a series of initiatives it can roll out to a much greater number of stores in 2019.

The entrants follow the growing push for digitization across the industry because it's much easier to test out than some of the major pieces of equipment involved in mining, said White.

The fields and arenas of professional sports are a testing ground for the return on investment that's possible from data analytics, and nothing did as much to popularize the concept of big data in sports as «Moneyball.»

For future studies, they suggested, researchers should test the performance of doped chess players given a much longer time limit, so the study could isolate the positive effects of brain drugs.

Meanwhile, Mitsubishi Motors has admitted using fake testing methods for fuel economy for 25 years, much longer than previously known, in another powerful blow to its reputation.

If you apply the traditional tests (time, money, and productivity), there's not a lot to hang your hat on and absolutely nothing that your phone alone won't pretty much do for you already.

Klemp believed in the science so much that he convinced investors to come on board for further research, including a repeat of all previous testing.

New York, Wall Street Journal — Genomic Health Inc. has struck a deal to commercialize a new blood test that can help advanced prostate cancer patients decide whether to try costly new - generation drugs or rely on much cheaper traditional chemotherapy to improve their chances for survival.

The federal government has voluntary guidelines for companies that want to test autonomous vehicles, leaving much of the regulation up to states.

Although the «flinch test» (keep raising the price and constraining the terms until the customer flinches) may have been an effective pricing art in the era of enterprise software, much more thoughtful strategies are needed for the modern models.

But you should be matter - of - fact about the risks — that your model hasn't been well tested in your particular industry, for example, or that the competition six months from now is likely to be much greater than it is now.

Higher risk because much of the technology is still in testing and hasn't hit mass market yet, but there is potential for big future payoff.

Much more significant is that the iPad Air 2 does Not have the same high performance display technology enhancements that we measured for the new iPhone 6 and iPhone 6 Plus, which we rated the best performing Smartphone LCD Display that we have ever tested.

Meanwhile, I've been my own harshest critic — particularly with regard to the unfortunate timing of my stress - testing decision in 2009 — and have been very open about the challenges that QE and yield - seeking speculation have posed for the methods that resulted: deferring market losses that resulted much more quickly following extremely overextended market conditions in prior historical cycles.

The only other comment I'd have is that whilst he meets a much higher standard of scientific approach than the snake oil dressed as financial advice elsewhere, the core testing methods used are opaque and (as far as I can tell) not peer reviewed or made available for scrutiny.

Their product gets so much negative backlash from those who've tested it out that they can't keep it on the market for too long.

But we think of diversity much more than just gender, though gender often becomes a litmus test for that.»

How much traffic do I need for my A / B test?

Beyond the free digital subscription trial, Facebook hasn't said it's committed to letting publishers test paid subscription signups, much less lay out a timeline for doing so.

you can ask questions all you want, test it as much as you like but only you can decide to believe.I have studied hell, read my books about, went to different websites and searched the bible, for a Christian to fear hell is not possible.For one Christ himself said he is the only way to the father.So I think the fear of hell comes from guilt or their power freaks.

he also healed my husband from a deadly diseases which i cant say we conducted a test and my husband came out positive after spending money in the hospital for years.Thank you So much if you need his help you can contact him via his private mail [email protected] you will not regret it thanks

The extent that one is willing to speak out against their own community is the bright line test for how much they care and how much they understand.

But the IQ test went much better for me.

So you have a small percentage (I would guess 15 %) for whom this is a litmus test in support of gay marriage and you have a much larger percentage who would NEVER vote for a candidate who supports gay marriage.

/ my IQ was 129 when tested at age 16, no idea what it is now, may have gone down for all i know, but i have to beleive that smarter people tend to be atheists, they have more critical thinking and tend not to rely on blind faith as much.

We have become way too much eyeball people as Christians assume that those who don't live according to the way they do they are unsaved, we have created this judgemental relationship which hurts peoples fellowship with God, there are no litmus tests for people that believe in Jesus, which is why we are called to not judge others, and people use James 2:14, and 1 John's verse of those who practices righteousness are righteous even though I think it's talking about earthly righteousness toward people that we as Christians should show because there is a lost world out there that needs are help and these doctrines of guilt, condemnation, anger, and judgement aren't helping in fact they are doing the opposite, just like how in James it's justification towards man.

Now, I am sure he thinks I am misled in my beliefs, but the claims of Christ, and the evidence for the resurrection have stood the test of timeas well the most rigorous of secular investigation... I notice not much was mentioned of Jesus and HIs claims, just the Old testament... interesting...

Well, as it turned out all my fears, which the night before the test resulted in me tossing and turning prior to sleep and having visions and thoughts of never, ever getting a driver's license, were for naught because old Bob though limited to one eye, passed the test with pretty much the same score he received in 1963.

But, then, the dirty little secret is exposed: non-religion (or secular humanism, as Torcaso v. Watkins admitted) is just as much a religion as any other, except that by pretending to not be a religion, it becomes the Constitutionally established faith and religious test, not just for public office but anything public (public policy, the public square), whose content is defined by the clerisy of a five justice «theocratic majoritarianism.»

tradition hard to break.the tradition of marriage is older and more meaningful than any other we know it crosses all religions and non religions, and races and cultures.it won't change easy.calling it something else for some people may make it easier to change.but what about those people who want that time tested tradition for themselves for their own self worth.it is a civil right give it to them today.this issues has divided my community as much as any other, but as we have fought to gain right after right, we have lost sight that all deserve the right of freedom of happiness.No gayness here, just can't fight the battle to keep someone down after being held down

Test me in this,» says the Lord Almighty, «and see if I will not throw open the floodgates of heaven and pour out so much blessing that you will not have room enough for it.

We are here on earth to have our faith tested (much more than that but this for the questions sake) Would there be a point to a test if we were given the answers?

@ c - casa said, «We are here on earth to have our faith tested (much more than that but this for the questions sake) Would there be a point to a test if we were given the answers?»

Notice, then, that in the prayer Jesus taught the order of things is this: first, identification with God, his will, his kingdom of sovereign love; next, asking for daily bread or what is needed to make life possible; then, deliverance from evil and from the test that will be too much for us; and all of it, as Matthew's gospel recognizes when it adds the doxology to the simpler Lukan version, to God's glory — so that the divine will may be done, and be seen done, «in earth as in heaven.»

I agree — I would even go one step further — it contains truth only in as much as it is lived, tested, and elaborated upon for our personal and communal lives.

If support ot rejection of gay marriage is this «christian's» litmus test for supporting a canidate, then he isn't much of a Christian, is he, whether or not his father was a preacher.

The test of our progress is not whether we add more to the abundance of those who have much; it is whether we provide enough for those who have too little.

But it's a test of how much he loves her, for him to decide how much he'll get beaten up for her.

Those in the practical fields accomplish this adjudication by testing against «the psychological disabilities, the power plays and hidden interests, the structural constrictions, and the stinginess and meanness that preoccupies much of life in every context» — in short, by encounter with «sin, and the need for salvation.»