Taking advantage of that fact today isn't so
much about an evolution in technology but an evolution in thinking.
Like the flick itself, this commentary was moderately enjoyable, but it didn't bring a lot to the table; don't expect to learn
much about Evolution.
The analysis did not include humans, and the researchers are sceptical that these results tell
us much about the evolution of human breeding systems.
Not exact matches
The genius of first - time screenwriter Liz Hannah's script is that she makes the story
about Graham's
evolution as
much as it is
about the Pentagon Papers.
you certainly don't know
much about the theory of
evolution if that's really what you think it says.
you sir are practicing a religion one that means so
much to you that you use it as your online name also please show me where I call you a fool or is telling someone not to make a fool of themself the same as calling them a fool which would mean you are very religious as far as Colin he said nothing that related to the debate I was in with you... we are talking
about Atheism as a religious view not debating the existence of God now look over the definitions I have shown you and please explain how Atheism does not fit into the said definitions And you claim that
evolution is true so the burden of proof falls in your lap as it is the base of your religion.
Please do your research on the subject matter, as there is
much more to learn
about human
evolution.
He's
much more qualified to speak
about evolution than the vast majority of people who talk
about Creationism.
Having a degree in physics and learned
much about scientific method, it takes far more faith to believe in
evolution.
I did, however, know
about evolution, from my Biology classes, which I had accepted as pretty
much fact.
Those who don't believe that they should ever stop to survey the creation or
evolution that they are a part of are most likely to not even care
about their own humanity
much less the humanity of others.
The «Creation versus
Evolution» Controversy; or: «
Much Ado
About Nothing» II.
to J.W. and fred — i think its rather silly to argue anything as fact if its cleary thought based (i.e. lacking proof / evidence) when asked
about the where did we come from or how the universe (whatever) i always answer with i don't know, but then i pose an idea — i state openly thats its only an idea... if any one of you religions folks would simple agree to the FACT that what you BELIEVE is real is REALLY only an idea until proven (
much like
evolution) then i would find
much more pleasing conversations beyond the realm of atheists... but alas, i am still waiting — i found some but most are imovible in there beliefs that god is real, provable, and most def.
We're talking
about a state that wants to take
evolution out of its science textbooks and Thomas Jefferson out of the history textbooks for being too
much of a «radical.»
I think Carl Jung came up with some good ways of thinking
about our cultural images and how they come
about — that scientists many hundreds or thousands of years later might have the same sorts of cultural images informing their intuitions, and thus using those images as the basis for a theory of
evolution is not so
much extraordinary than it is to be expected.
I can't prove God's existence just as
much as scientist can't prove the big bang... there is evidence of both but to reach a conclusion takes faith... one side leaves hope and the other does not... maybe I'm agnostic too because I don't claim to know everything
about why I'm here, I have to have faith... Honestly, I'm sick of the extremes on both sides... the conservative judgmental Christian, who never thought through things as to why the believe what they do (ie Dinosaurs, cavemen,
evolution, etc.) and the intellectually arrogant atheist and humanists.
, while I agree that what is known
about evolution is evolving, there is way more evidence for it than for any god or the jesus myth, despite religion being around
much longer.
One of the most remarkable features of
much of so - called «neo-orthodox» theological thought is its explicit or implicit attitude that the fact (or the theory) of
evolution is not relevant to religious reflection
about the nature of God or the meaning of Christian faith.
Fairly distinct types of solution to the religio - political problem (Or fairly distinct types of civil religion) seem to correlate with the phases of religious
evolution as I have described them.3 In primitive society neither politics nor religion is very well differentiated, so there is not
much point in talking
about the relationship between them.
Furthermore, since this discussion was
about evolution and creation, it's on the complete opposite end of the book you love so
much.
Federal courts in Louisiana recently reached the conclusion that too
much thinking
about the difficult issues involved in
evolution can be downright dangerous.
I'd
much rather read
about the rationale behind this
evolution, as my take on food evolves as well, than be stuck in an unchanging closed - minded viewpoint.
We don't know
much about phallus
evolution (external genitalia generally don't mineralize, so the fossil record is of little help), but we can compare the expression of phallus genes from organism to organism.
Female choice for good quality males is familiar to everyone, whereas
much less is known
about the
evolution of male mate choice.
Even after half a century of unraveling the structure and
evolution of galaxies, astronomers still had
much to learn
about them.
Building artificial cells will tell us
much about the origins of life — and may explain how Darwinian
evolution began, says Nobel laureate Jack Szostak
Palaeoanthropologists often use chimps as «proxies» for our common ancestor, so Ardi's debut may mean that
much of what we think we know
about human
evolution will have to be rethought.
We don't know
much about the genetic
evolution of the human brain.
«These results call into question
much of what has been thought and taught previously
about floral
evolution!
Collectively, the remains displayed on these pages tell
much about the lives that dinosaurs lived, the origin of bird flight, the ecosystems during the ageof the reptiles, and the nature of
evolution itself.
It is a known phenomenon and one of many that we do not yet fully understand but which may be telling us as
much about learning and
evolution of the brain as
about how we forget.
I didn't know
much about [
evolution] but I had lots of experience with different techniques» in molecular biology, she says.
Space scientist William Bottke of the Southwest Research Institute in Boulder, Colorado, says the findings reveal
much about the physical
evolution of asteroids.
For decades theories
about human
evolution had proliferated despite the absence of
much, if any, hard evidence.
The account of the players and theories in the field of human
evolution does highlight how
much of the debate involves mere name games, with lumpers and splitters arguing ad nauseam
about the same few specimens widely scattered through space and time.
With this research, «we can really find out so
much more
about evolution.»
In a new study, researchers claim that parasitic lice can tell us
much about the course of bird and mammal
evolution, including whether the ancestors of these animals made it through a mass extinction that wiped out most of the dinosaurs.
While the Human Genome Project revealed
much about our common humanity, recently scientists have begun to learn a lot
about human
evolution from the small genetic differences that set us apart.
The latter would enable the most detailed possible analysis, providing a crucial link with remote spectroscopic observations and the compositions of meteorites in order to develop a
much wider understanding of these small bodies, their properties, and what they can tell us
about the
evolution of the solar system.
«Genetic recombination is a fundamental process, at the core of reproduction and
evolution,» said study author Graham Coop, PhD, post-doctoral fellow in the Department of Human Genetics at the University of Chicago, «yet we know very little
about where it occurs or why there is so
much variation among individuals in this important process.»
And while the origins of modern human behavior have been widely debated, there has been
much less discussion
about the
evolution of modern human anatomy.
«There are lots of ideas
about how cosmic
evolution proceeded, but not
much evidence,» he said.
We actually derive
much of our knowledge
about asteroids and the
evolution of planets from the study of meteorites.
By looking to the diets and lifestyles of our ancestors, we believe that
evolution has
much to teach us
about human optimization and healthful living.
Men tend to be interested in bodies and that's what women lied
about, and women tend to be interested in status indicators and for
much of
evolution, height was a good status indicator — and sure enough men lied in exactly that way.»
Spielberg widened the film's focus to encompass the story's other angles — Ellsberg's
evolution, the Washington elite's lies
about the war, and the tick - tock of daily - deadline journalism — but the rise of Mrs. Graham, in an era when the word Ms. hadn't yet been popularized and the concept of gender equality wasn't paid so
much as lip service, remains a central theme.
Pro
Evolution Soccer 2015 gave me some of the most illuminating competitive experiences I've had, raising difficult questions
about how
much presentation and licensing should matter.
Here is what one of our readers had to say
about the new film: «I went in trying to enjoy the film aspect of it and came out thinking that this was just another abomination of a
much beloved series,
much like the film Dragonball
Evolution.»
What does it say to you
about where we are in the
evolution of the superhero genre that this R - rated, irreverent comic - book movie resonated so
much with audiences?
While controversy over the science requirements turned this lawsuit into another story
about evolution and intelligent design for many in the media, the case is, in fact,
about much more.