So glad you know so
much about Scripture, though.
Not exact matches
Edwards is passionate
about IHOP and
about an intimate understanding of
Scripture — so
much so that her priority remains to lead people into worship there, even when opportunities to tour continually come beckoning.
What I'm actually saying is that I think God is so
much bigger and more incomprehensible than what we read
about Him in
Scripture.
I gradually began to see that Christianity is not
about solitary seekers after truth who just get together once in a while for a chat: other people are very
much part of the divine scheme of things — even
scripture has come down to us through the agency of other people.
But this seems to go against
much of what
Scripture says
about «testing the spirits» (1 John 4:1), and ignores warnings
about how false prophets come in sheep's clothing (Matt 7:15).
Teachings
about the Trinity, the Incarnation, and so forth that have not only been grounded in large portions of
Scripture but have also been accepted by the vast majority of Christians in history — those we can pretty
much give our lives to.
Somehow the parts of
Scripture that really do have something to say
about how we use our resources pretty
much get bypassed because most of our available resources are consumed by the property - staff - programs triad.
Have you ever had someone discredit what you say
about Scripture because you don't have as
much education as they do?
He demonstrates that
Scripture, (including Ecclesiastes, the Song of Songs, Proverbs, Hosea, and the gospel accounts of Jesus» friendships, for example) has
much to say
about play.
I am not writing any of this to argue with anyone
about philosophy,
Scripture or anything else, nor will I conjecture as to why this topic agitates you so
much.
The truth is, how we «pick and choose» from
Scripture often says as
much about us as it says
about the Bible.
Since
Scripture never speaks explicitly of the Trinity, the thinking went, Christians should not presume to be able to say too
much about it.
These manuscripts were representative of a
much larger body of material which has since grown so extensively that today it includes
about 70 papyri (portions written on papyrus),
about 230 uncials (manuscripts with rounded letters),
about 2,500 minuscules (manuscripts with small letters), and
about 1,700 lectionaries (portions of
Scripture arranged for worship).
I will argue that my experience with
Scripture will certainly come to include theoretical knowledge
about Scripture but that this only becomes relevant in the fight of my concrete experience with the truth of
Scripture,
much of which can never be fully articulated.
Regarding the eternal state of people who do not believe in Jesus for eternal life, I do think there is some sort of eternal separation from God, though I am not sure
Scripture says
much about it.
Nature has just as
much beauty, order, love, and wonder as it does death, blood, suffering, and murder, and
Scripture has hundreds of dark and disturbing passages which seems to paint a different picture of God than we read
about in the Gospels or in 1 John 4:8.
Evangelicals are beginning to understand that the real questions
about appropriating the
Scriptures are not so
much matters of doctrine as they are of hermeneutics.
Finally, we can learn
much about Barth (and, of course, other great Christian thinkers) by watching how he interprets
scripture; work at this task is still underdeveloped.
After
much study, prayer and thought I am convinced that the idea that only men are allowed to teach
scripture, be a pastor, be an elder etc. etc. was a teaching that came
about due to the status of women during a particular time and culture and continued because of the patriarchal system that most churches have continued to operate under.
I bet if you took all those people who want to beat the US over the head with
scripture don't know
much about it.
Likewise, the Presbyterian Church (USA)'s changes to its policy took place over a
much longer time than Azumah names, involved persons holding many positions left undescribed, and came
about not because the denomination chose to ignore the
Scriptures but because over time, many of us became convinced that there are theologically and historically faithful ways of reading the
Scriptures that find space for contemporary understandings of homosexuality.
Only eternity, the Good, and so also the Holy
Scriptures, are of another opinion
about this matter of evasions and
about the
much - honored clever ones.
I want so
much to lead him to a correct understanding of
scripture — not that God loves us all and overlooks our sin so we're all OK and don't need to worry
about it, but rather that He loves us enough to lead us away from our sin.
With how
much it is talked
about in our pulpits and written
about in out books, one would think that warning against false teachers is a popular topic in
Scripture.
I am not certain that this idea is exactly found in
Scripture, but regardless of what the original founders thought
about the pursuit of happiness, and whether or not it is actually taught in
Scripture, the pursuit today is not so
much happiness, but pleasure or personal fulfillment, even when such things come at the expense of others.
But when we recognize (as we saw in the post yesterday
about the definition of baptism) that «baptism» means «immersion into» or «identification with» some of the tricky passages in
Scripture become
much more clear.
So this: «Finally, for this God,
much of the Jewish
scriptures (which are all God's word) are actually
about foreshadowing Jesus.
Finally, for this God,
much of the Jewish
scriptures (which are all God's word) are actually
about foreshadowing Jesus.
All I was saying was that IF you think it is a sin, we should still love and accept LGBT people, just as we love and accept people who lie, eat too
much, drink too
much, are lazy, are proud, etc, all of which are clearly sins (and are talked
about in
Scripture way more than homosexuality).
M.D That is why it is important to have his guidance in understanding for yourself the more we walk in the truth of Gods word the more he reveals to us.That is a key to understanding the
scriptures its not
about how
much we know
about it but how
much we walk in it.Then the word becomes living and real and people should see Jesus in us.brentnz
The Gospel of Jesus is
much more than a few
Scripture verses or a few ideas
about God; it is a way of being in the world and living our everyday lives.
In the course of this exhortation,
much is said
about «the word of God» and
about the «understanding of the
Scriptures.»
All you are doing Spoc aka Bob is showing how
much you don't know
about reading comprehension 101 because when the
scriptures are put into historical context, nowhere does it condemn the saved loving long term relationship of a gay couple as we know and understand it today.
But actually requiring a dialogue, question and answer, interactive discussion
about a text of
Scripture, which then leads to brainstorming
about how everybody can go out and put it into practice in tangible ways, and then actually going out and doing it, requires too
much for most people.
The end result is that we can agree with
much of what science says
about the formation of the Grand Canyon while at the same time, seeing that such views are supported and defended by
Scripture.
What I find puzzling is the obsession with consensual and faithful gay relationships when
Scripture says
much more
about divorce and remarriage (every single sex act with a second spouse is ALWAYS adultery unless someone is unfaithful and that the only moral choice is reconciliation with your first spouse or lifetime celibacy — 1 Cor 7:10 - 11), charging interest on a loan, our moral obligation toward the poor and other things most conservative Christians ignore.
I believe that by looking at what the authors of
Scripture say
about Scripture, we can arrive a
much better position — one where we maintain the accuracy and authority of
Scripture, but in such a way that
Scripture is not set up as a sacred idol.
But now I see, those
scriptures so often used to exclude... they were usually spoken to the religious elite, not the «sinners» everyone seems to panic
about so
much.
The fact that there are pessimistic and apocalyptic «minded Catholics does not prove anything
about dispensationalism, but says
much of the dangers of straying from the norms of
Scripture, Tradition, and authoritative teaching.
Scripture even teaches irony, as when God sarcastically addresses Jonah, who is complaining
about the collapse of his bean vine: «Should I not spare Nineveh, this great city, wherein are more than six score thousand persons that can not discern between their right hand and their left hand, and also
much cattle?»
@Tea Partier... hmmm, when I walk into the average nursing home in this «Great Christian Nation» of ours, I have to ask how
much you and your Tea Party friends care
about the elderly... I am amazed at how little conservatives, Evangelicals and the latest version Tea Party members care so little for the living except their own tribe in the so - called «light» of their
scriptures...
Finally, just because the gospels do not give
much detail
about the crucifixion does not discount the rest of
Scripture.
What Genesis 4:8 teaches us
about God, ourselves,
Scripture, history, politics, economics, and pretty
much everything else in life.
I don't think it's so
much about the levites being paid for their service it's
about us doing what's right toward Pastors that must feed and tend to the flock of GOD if GOD has called them.JESUS even said in luke 10:7 that the laborers are worthy of their wages.In luke 8 1 - 4 it's says even JESUS HIMSELF recieved financial support from the women who ministered to him with their possessions.Now most people today would say he should have been ashamed of taking money from those poor women but JESUS accepted their support and they was blessed for sowing onto the LORD»S work.1 Corinthains 9:1 - 15 says dint muzzle the ox while it tread out the grain was GOD talking
about oxes no he was talking
about those who labor in the ministry.Who goes to war at their own expense.Or who goes to war but pay for their clothes, guns, etc.No one because the goverment if that country provide these things because of the soilders service.Who plants a vineyard and don't eat from it.Who tends a flock and don't drink the milk of it.I think it's just spiritual sense to support a pastor that's teaching you the word, casting out devils, laying hands and healing is manifesting in people lived, going to hospitails, prisons, and house calls to pray for the sick and shut in, going to graduations and funnerals, praying and fasting for himself and the flock.I think a person who think a pastor shouldn't be paid for their service either don't know they need to be paid and need to be taught or they are demonic in their thinking and either hate GOD, PASTORS, AND GOD»S PEOPLE.Why do nt you hear people saying anything against the dope dealers, strip clubs, dope houses, liquor stores, etc.It's only when people give into the LORD»S work that evil minded or misinformed people have a problem with it.No sir we don't have to use the old testament to show that we should support out pastors.You don't use the law, love tells me to support the pastor.Under the new testament LOVE is the greatest of all.Love for GOD and man.If GOD asked for 10 percent under the law to support the levites who didn't have all the responsibilities of Pastor today.Church rent, gas for vans of thd church, insurance fir the church and church vehicles, feeding and clothing the poor, light, gas, and water bill, mantience on the church or vehicles, not to mention the Pastor own house, cars, children, insurance, etc.If would be foolish for one to think that a pastor should take care if his house and GODS HOUSE without people supporting the work of the KINGDOM OF GOD.If we love GOD we are going to support HIS KINGDOM and HIS PASTOR.If under the law GOD asked for 10 percent how
much should we give under the LOVE COVENANT?Example I love my wife and if I had 300 dollars I would surley give her more that 10 percent which would be 30 dollars because I love her.The law says you must give LOVE says I chose to give because I love GOD and man.Again we don't have to use the law just love and spiritual sense because hate and a carnal senses will not understand.Now I have given you
scriptures please do the same when you respond not your opinion.Please respond right away I await your answer.GOD BLESS.
Karlstadt had in fact said just this
about scripture more than two years previously but no one had bothered because it was said by a rather myopic officious academic whom nobody cared
much about, and who never managed to project his message widely.
Church is the people — this
much we know from
scripture — God cares
about us — not some system or some institution — He sent his son for us... not to redeem a building or a «way of doing things».
Many appear to be
much concerned
about it, but nothing is more evident, both in reason, and in the holy
Scripture, than that religion is ever a matter between God and individuals; and therefore no man or men can impose any religious test without invading the essential prerogatives of our Lord Jesus Christ....
Much of her recent work has focused on sharing the stories and experiences of intersex people and examining what
Scripture has to say
about people who do not fit into rigid, binary gender categories.
All Year: The Bible (There are many translations available at biblegateway.com)- Anchor Bible Commentary Series - The Women's Bible Commentary, Edited by Carol A. Newsom and Sharon H. Ringe - Living Judaism: The Guide to Jewish Belief, Tradition, and Practice by Wayne D. Dosick - Women in
Scripture: A Dictionary of Named and Unnamed Women in the Hebrew Bible, the Apocryphal / Deuterocanonical books, and the New Testament, Edited by Carol Meyers, Toni Cravien, and Ross Shepard Kraemer - Recovering Biblical Manhood and Womanhood, Edited by John Piper and Wayne Grudem - Discovering Biblical Equality: Complementarity Without Hierarchy, Edited by Ronald W. Pierce, Rebecca Merrill Groothuis and Gordon D. Fee - Women in the World of the Earliest Christians: Illuminating Ancient Ways of Life by Lynn Cohick - God's Word to Women by Katharine C. Bushnell - Don't Know
Much About the Bible: Everything You Need to Know
About the Good Book but Never Learned by Kenneth C. Davis - «On The Dignity and Vocation of Women» by Pope John Paul II - The Year of Living Biblically by A.J. Jacobs
About Blog Welcome to Theological Miscellany, a blog by Westminster Theological Centre faculty and friends where we post a variety of theological reflections on
scripture, life, culture, politics, society, gender, and pretty
much anything.