Sentences with phrase «much about religion»

Though it wasn't apparent from the media blitz for Red Dead Redemption, Rockstar's latest opus was just as much about religion and religious people as it was about rustling cattle and bringing outlaws to justice.

We really don't mention too much about religion anymore as it's really focused on Jewish dating for marriage.

I just told you that I think if he made a slip like that it is because he doesn't care much about religion at all.

Guess who else doesn't know much about religion CNN?

But there is so much about religion beyond that that I often can't believe how much this is reiterated.

B. Scovern, you must be one of the masses that doesn't know all that much about religion.

There is a political factor, with twice as many Democrats saying politicians talk too much about religion as Republicans.

We don't know a lot about religion even though we are atheists; we are atheists because we know so much about religion.

I doubt you ever knew much about your religion before you just wimped out.

I actually don't talk to them much about religion, that's their thing, not mine.

Mr. Nye obviously does not understand much about religion.

If you don't care very much about religion, you're not likely to oppose state action for religious reasons.

I was a believer before, but I did not read much about religion and it was batter.

The study «implies that when people don't know much about a religion, they have an instinctive fear of that group.»

Dude, you are WAY out of your element, having read the bible, a couple of times I might add, I can assure you that I know probably about as much about your religion as you do and quite a bit more about the many religions out there apart from christianity.

I think this article does a great job exposing us to the truth of the chaplain's real experience, which is that when people have a last opportunity to talk about what is most important, they don't talk much about their religion, they talk about their families.

Not exact matches

They really don't — the concept of somebody saving their lives from a crucified execution occurring 2,000 years ago is appropriately distant and irrelevant to them, because the vast majority of believers put as much thought and effort into what they believe about their religion as WHY they believe what they believe about their religion.

What they have to say about religion is much more pointed and direct than even what The Path says.

Obamas religion however is straight up christian and it won't really do much good to follow him around with a moving billboard that lists death tolls from christian persecution or other things about the dogma that people already know and either don't care or already accept.

What Hitchens wrote about the evils of religion was not so much a scholarly argument, but more a wave of righteous indignation that levelled everything in its path.

The Obama administration could have groveled and apologized as much as they wanted about the unfortunate fact that Americans are allowed mock religions.

Crom, I wonder why you care so much about this topic / article when you don't believe in God / religion?

Presidential oratory provides much of the supporting evidence for McDougall's ideas about civil religion, from President William McKinley's implication that the United States had not so much conquered Cubans as it had ministered to them («Are we not made better for the effort and sacrifice, and are not those we serve lifted up and blessed?»)

There is much that could be said about this, but I will stick with one thing, based on discussion at about the 2 minute mark: When atheists insist that atheism does not drive behavior, and then then campaign on behalf of atheism, ridicule religion and religious believers in the name of atheism, seek to change laws in favor of their atheistic positions, recommend the extermination of religion, and practice falsehoods like Dawkins's in support of atheism, they prove that their atheism drives their behavior and that their premise is false, disingenuous, and (as far as I can tell) useless for anything but giving atheism rhetorical cover from being implicated in atheists» atrocities.

I think if Jesus were alive today (literally... I know to Christians he is alive) he would have so much to say and clarify about the tragedies that have unfolded out of this organized religion.

You can be an agnostic or an atheist when it comes to religion but it's much more difficult when we're talking about the World Cup.

How about moving past religion to a much safer and saner future?

Much of classical music is instrumental, operas are not always about religion, country music isn't always religious, folk music depends on the origin which can be secular or of other religions besides Christian, much of rock and pop music is not religious, and soMuch of classical music is instrumental, operas are not always about religion, country music isn't always religious, folk music depends on the origin which can be secular or of other religions besides Christian, much of rock and pop music is not religious, and somuch of rock and pop music is not religious, and so on.

I am not sure that a practicing believer of any faith, taking a break from verbosity about their religion, will be any less religious... or gain much insight into the commonality of humanity and human experience.

For you to hatefully comment on religious articles about how much you HATE religion is a lot like someone complaining of a headache while bashing their forehead with a mallet.

you sir are practicing a religion one that means so much to you that you use it as your online name also please show me where I call you a fool or is telling someone not to make a fool of themself the same as calling them a fool which would mean you are very religious as far as Colin he said nothing that related to the debate I was in with you... we are talking about Atheism as a religious view not debating the existence of God now look over the definitions I have shown you and please explain how Atheism does not fit into the said definitions And you claim that evolution is true so the burden of proof falls in your lap as it is the base of your religion.

Most of the wars we no about have little to do with religion per se, much to do with wanting what someone else has, wanting to control what someone else does, or fearing someone else because they are different.

(A similar set of questions could be asked, mutatis mutandis, about Jewish involvement with Islam, a religion that also claims, although to a much lesser extent than Christianity, descent from Judaism.)

Much of what has been posted are inconvenient truths about the Mormon religion that you all simply choose to ignore, overlook or claim we «don't understand.»

As far as the Mormon religion... I will admit that I don't know too too much about it however..

IMO way to much air time for a religion that people would / could and much rather live without knowing about.

Much like John F. Kennedy's run for the presidency prompted a national discussion about religion and Catholicism in the American experiment, Hailemariam's emergence has had an impact on religious discourse in Ethiopia.

I am neither a christian or muslim but what right do christians have in making fun of muslims and their books when so much trash exists in their houses only difference being that other religions are open about their practices and even accept their mistakes..

Every religion has a education system about that religion, if it was innately true, you would think that you wouldn't need to spend so much time to make someone believe it is true.

The number of Americans who expressed uncertainly about the president's religion, meanwhile, is much larger and has also grown, including among Obama's political base.

I'm not saying that I believe this, of course there is about as much proof to this as there are to any other religions.

So many people who advocate or speak publicly for political or personal reasons aren't acknowledged as much when it comes to religion when someone is wanting to speak out about there faith a light bulb goes off and says we don't want to hear, or talk, or, air any thing that has to do with the mentioning of God but because of the high profile story and because this is the President of the United States it's ok hats off to them for not being ashamed to speak about there faith I agree with Richard some people just because they profess there faith doesn't mean there trying to push there beliefs on anyone people of faith have a right to free speech also.

As far as the people who had a lot to do with starting these big religions I don't know much about them, but blind faith is pitiful.

We want everyone to hear as much as possible about our religion.

do I need any approval before I practice my religion, do I have to prove my religion before I practice, my holy book further describe that you must carry a gun in 21st century because there is too much crime in this world, but it doesn't say much about if I migrate to another country these rules will still apply, Or I should modified them according to my comfort, like talking in English which is not my religious language wearing pants or not, having education or not, standing in line or not, I am so confused what should I do can someone help me, should I go back to country where my religion originated or back in time ask my guru questions about western world confusion, or just decide by myself what suites me, or preach other develop country that you guys are wrong be peaceful.

But you should also note that much of the history you study is about major religions that rose to positions of power over the people.

RICO statutes are about organized crime, much more relevant in going after religious people who often support criminal organizations operating behind the name of religion.

If God is not much concerned about religion as a separate sphere of private or public life and if he is present where the needy cry out for help, then as Christians we can not fail to take most seriously the analysis of the concrete social situation in which we find ourselves.

And you have absolutely no idea what RICO is about; if you did, there would be a much larger push to tax the biggest racketeers of all: organized religion.

The religion I was in as a youth didn't teach about a trinity so Mary never came into the picture so much.